Literature DB >> 29341323

Test-retest reliability and longitudinal analysis of automated hippocampal subregion volumes in healthy ageing and Alzheimer's disease populations.

Amanda Worker1, Danai Dima1, Anna Combes1, William R Crum1, Johannes Streffer2, Steven Einstein3, Mitul A Mehta1, Gareth J Barker1, Steve C R Williams1, Owen O'daly1.   

Abstract

The hippocampal formation is a complex brain structure that is important in cognitive processes such as memory, mood, reward processing and other executive functions. Histological and neuroimaging studies have implicated the hippocampal region in neuropsychiatric disorders as well as in neurodegenerative diseases. This highly plastic limbic region is made up of several subregions that are believed to have different functional roles. Therefore, there is a growing interest in imaging the subregions of the hippocampal formation rather than modelling the hippocampus as a homogenous structure, driving the development of new automated analysis tools. Consequently, there is a pressing need to understand the stability of the measures derived from these new techniques. In this study, an automated hippocampal subregion segmentation pipeline, released as a developmental version of Freesurfer (v6.0), was applied to T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 22 healthy older participants, scanned on 3 separate occasions and a separate longitudinal dataset of 40 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Test-retest reliability of hippocampal subregion volumes was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), percentage volume difference and percentage volume overlap (Dice). Sensitivity of the regional estimates to longitudinal change was estimated using linear mixed effects (LME) modelling. The results show that out of the 24 hippocampal subregions, 20 had ICC scores of 0.9 or higher in both samples; these regions include the molecular layer, granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus, CA1, CA3 and the subiculum (ICC > 0.9), whilst the hippocampal fissure and fimbria had lower ICC scores (0.73-0.88). Furthermore, LME analysis of the independent AD dataset demonstrated sensitivity to group and individual differences in the rate of volume change over time in several hippocampal subregions (CA1, molecular layer, CA3, hippocampal tail, fissure and presubiculum). These results indicate that this automated segmentation method provides a robust method with which to measure hippocampal subregions, and may be useful in tracking disease progression and measuring the effects of pharmacological intervention.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FreeSurfer; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; brain structure; hippocampal subfields; hippocampus; intraclass correlation coefficient; linear mixed effects; test-retest reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29341323      PMCID: PMC6866454          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  37 in total

1.  Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient.

Authors:  Alejandro Caceres; Deanna L Hall; Fernando O Zelaya; Steven C R Williams; Mitul A Mehta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Structural neuroimaging studies in major depressive disorder. Meta-analysis and comparison with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Matthew J Kempton; Zainab Salvador; Marcus R Munafò; John R Geddes; Andrew Simmons; Sophia Frangou; Steven C R Williams
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07

3.  Gray matter correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder: a quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simone Kühn; Jürgen Gallinat
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis.

Authors:  Martin Reuter; Nicholas J Schmansky; H Diana Rosas; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Chronic antidepressant treatment increases neurogenesis in adult rat hippocampus.

Authors:  J E Malberg; A J Eisch; E J Nestler; R S Duman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A pathophysiological framework of hippocampal dysfunction in ageing and disease.

Authors:  Scott A Small; Scott A Schobel; Richard B Buxton; Menno P Witter; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Long-term treatment with paroxetine increases verbal declarative memory and hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Eric Vermetten; Meena Vythilingam; Steven M Southwick; Dennis S Charney; J Douglas Bremner
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Implications of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in antidepressant action.

Authors:  Jessica E Malberg
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.186

9.  Scan-rescan reliability of subcortical brain volumes derived from automated segmentation.

Authors:  Rajendra A Morey; Elizabeth S Selgrade; Henry Ryan Wagner; Scott A Huettel; Lihong Wang; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  MIRIAD--Public release of a multiple time point Alzheimer's MR imaging dataset.

Authors:  Ian B Malone; David Cash; Gerard R Ridgway; David G MacManus; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox; Jonathan M Schott
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  22 in total

1.  Hippocampal tail volume as a predictive biomarker of antidepressant treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder: a CAN-BIND report.

Authors:  Nikita Nogovitsyn; Meghan Muller; Roberto Souza; Stefanie Hassel; Stephen R Arnott; Andrew D Davis; Geoffrey B Hall; Jacqueline K Harris; Mojdeh Zamyadi; Paul D Metzak; Zahinoor Ismail; Jonathan Downar; Sagar V Parikh; Claudio N Soares; Jean M Addington; Roumen Milev; Kate L Harkness; Benicio N Frey; Raymond W Lam; Stephen C Strother; Susan Rotzinger; Sidney H Kennedy; Glenda M MacQueen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Automated brain volumetric measures with AccuBrain: version comparison in accuracy, reproducibility and application for diagnosis.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Yishan Luo; Vincent Mok; Lin Shi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.795

3.  Lacking social support is associated with structural divergences in hippocampus-default network co-variation patterns.

Authors:  Chris Zajner; R Nathan Spreng; Danilo Bzdok
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.235

4.  Integrating Convolutional Neural Networks and Multi-Task Dictionary Learning for Cognitive Decline Prediction with Longitudinal Images.

Authors:  Qunxi Dong; Jie Zhang; Qingyang Li; Junwen Wang; Natasha Leporé; Paul M Thompson; Richard J Caselli; Jieping Ye; Yalin Wang
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  The presubiculum links incipient amyloid and tau pathology to memory function in older persons.

Authors:  Heidi I L Jacobs; Jean C Augustinack; Aaron P Schultz; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Joseph Locascio; Rebecca E Amariglio; Kathryn V Papp; Dorene M Rentz; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Test-retest reliability of hippocampal subfield volumes in a developmental sample: Implications for longitudinal developmental studies.

Authors:  Roya Homayouni; Qijing Yu; Sruthi Ramesh; Lingfei Tang; Ana M Daugherty; Noa Ofen
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.433

7.  Test-retest reliability and longitudinal analysis of automated hippocampal subregion volumes in healthy ageing and Alzheimer's disease populations.

Authors:  Amanda Worker; Danai Dima; Anna Combes; William R Crum; Johannes Streffer; Steven Einstein; Mitul A Mehta; Gareth J Barker; Steve C R Williams; Owen O'daly
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Utility of MRI in the identification of hippocampal sclerosis of aging.

Authors:  Davis C Woodworth; Hannah L Nguyen; Zainab Khan; Claudia H Kawas; María M Corrada; S Ahmad Sajjadi
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 21.566

9.  Generalizing deep whole-brain segmentation for post-contrast MRI with transfer learning.

Authors:  Camilo Bermudez; Samuel W Remedios; Karthik Ramadass; Maureen McHugo; Stephan Heckers; Yuankai Huo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-23

10.  Differential Role for Hippocampal Subfields in Alzheimer's Disease Progression Revealed with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Kichang Kwak; Marc Niethammer; Kelly S Giovanello; Martin Styner; Eran Dayan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.