| Literature DB >> 29339988 |
André Seabra1,2, Ricardo J Fernandes3, Elisa Marques4, Miguel Moura1, Esther Ubago-Guisado5, Enrique Hernando5, Leonor Gallardo5.
Abstract
Physical activity plays a crucial role in bone mass acquisition during childhood and adolescence, with weightbearing and high-impact sport activities being more beneficial. This study sought to evaluate the impact of different sports activities on bone mineral density and content in male Portuguese athletes. Seventy adolescent boys (aged 12-15 years) including 28 futsal players (FG), 20 swimmers (SG) and 22 non-athletic adolescents used as control subjects (CG), participated in the current study. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and areal bone mineral content (aBMC) were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Futsal players had significantly higher aBMD (lumbar spine - FG: 0.95 ± 0.18, SG: 0.80 ± 0.13, CG: 0.79 ± 0.13 g/cm2, p = 0.001; pelvis - FG: 1.17 ± 0.21, SG: 0.91 ± 0.12, CG: 0.98 ± 0.10 g/cm2, p < 0.001; lower limbs - FG: 1.21 ± 0.19, SG: 0.97 ± 0.10, CG: 0.99 ± 0.09 g/cm2, p < 0.001) and aBMC (lumbar spine - FG: 51.07 ± 16.53, SG: 40.19 ± 12.47, CG: 40.50 ± 10.53 g, p = 0.013; pelvis - FG: 299.5 ± 110.61, SG: 170.02 ± 55.82, CG: 183.11 ± 46.78 g, p < 0.001; lower limbs - FG: 427.21 ± 117.11, SG: 300.13 ± 76.42, CG: 312.26 ± 61.86 g/cm2, p < 0.001) than swimmers and control subjects. Data suggest that futsal, as a weightbearing and high or odd-impact sport, may improve bone mass during childhood and adolescence.Entities:
Keywords: bone mineral density; futsal; swimming; youth
Year: 2017 PMID: 29339988 PMCID: PMC5765788 DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Anthropometric, nutritional, physical activity and maturity status and sport experience variables and regional areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and areal bone mineral content (aBMC) of study participants.
| Variables | FG | SG | CG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 13.5 (1.2) | 13.2 (1.2) | 13.4 (0.9) | 0.541 |
| Body height (cm) | 165.2 (9.6) | 162.1 (10.6) | 161.4 (8.2) | 0.152 |
| Body mass (kg) | 53.7 (12.8) | 57.1 (10.3) | 52.9 (8.2) | 0.131 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.6 (3.1) | 20.3 (2.3) | 20.2 (2.8) | 0.563 |
| Years of experience | 6 (1) | 6 (2) | -- | 0.131 |
| Sessions training per week | 3 (1) | 6 (1) | -- | <0.001 |
| Hours of training per week | 4 (1) | 9 (2) | -- | <0.001 |
| Maturity status n (%) | 0.182 | |||
| PH 2-3 15 | (53.6) | 13 (65.0) | 17 (77.2) | |
| PH 4-5 13 | (46.4) | 7 (35.0) | 5 (22.8) | |
| Calcium intake (mg) | 1106 (103) | 1054 (118) | 1050 (130) | 0.163 |
| MVPA (min⋅d-1) | 54.3 (13.8) | 55.7 (16.4) | 51.2 (10.8) | 0.552 |
| Lumbar spine | 0.80 (0.13) | 0.79 (0.13) | 0.001 | |
| Pelvis | 0.91 (0.12) | 0.98 (0.10) | <0.001 | |
| Lower limbs | 0.97 (0.10) | 0.99 (0.09) | <0.001 | |
| aBMC (g) | ||||
| Lumbar spine | 40.19 (12.47) | 40.50 (10.53) | 0.013 | |
| Pelvis | 170.02 (55.82) | 183.11 (46.78) | <0.001 | |
| Lower limbs | 300.13 (76.42) | 312.26 (61.86) | <0.001 | |
Data are presented as means (standard deviation). PH: stage of pubic hair; aBMD: areal bone mineral density; aBMC: areal bone mineral content; MVPA: moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity.
Significantly different from SG and CG (p < 0.05)