Nicolas H Hart1, Sophia Nimphius, Jason Weber, Tania Spiteri, Timo Rantalainen, Michael Dobbin, Robert U Newton. 1. 1Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA; 2Fremantle Dockers Football Club, Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA; 3Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA; 4School of Health Science, University of Notre Dame, Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA; and 5School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Asymmetrical loading patterns are commonplace in football sports. Our aim was to examine the influence of training age and limb function on lower-body musculoskeletal morphology. METHODS: Fifty-five elite football athletes were stratified into less experienced (≤3 yr; n = 27) and more experienced (>3 yr; n = 28) groups by training age. All athletes underwent whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans and lower-body peripheral quantitative computed tomography tibial scans on the kicking and support limbs. RESULTS: Significant interactions between training age and limb function were evident across all skeletal parameters (F16, 91 = 0.182, P = 0.031, Wilks Λ = 0.969). Asymmetries between limbs were significantly larger in the more experienced players than the less experienced players for tibial mass (P ≤ 0.044, d ≥ 0.50), total cross-sectional area (P ≤ 0.039, d ≥ 0.53), and stress-strain indices (P ≤ 0.050, d ≥ 0.42). No significant asymmetry was evident for total volumetric density. More experienced players also exhibited greater lower-body tibial mass (P ≤ 0.001, d ≥ 1.22), volumetric density (P ≤ 0.009, d ≥ 0.79), cross-sectional area (P ≤ 0.387, d ≥ 0.21), stress-strain indices (P ≤ 0.012, d ≥ 0.69), fracture loads (P ≤ 0.018, d ≥ 0.57), and muscle mass and cross-sectional area (P ≤ 0.016, d ≥ 0.68) than less experienced players. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetries were evident in athletes as a product of limb function over time. Chronic exposure to routine high-impact gravitational loads afforded to the support limb preferentially improved bone mass and structure (cross-sectional area and cortex thickness) as potent contributors to bone strength relative to the high-magnitude muscular loads predominantly afforded to the kicking limb.
PURPOSE: Asymmetrical loading patterns are commonplace in football sports. Our aim was to examine the influence of training age and limb function on lower-body musculoskeletal morphology. METHODS: Fifty-five elite football athletes were stratified into less experienced (≤3 yr; n = 27) and more experienced (>3 yr; n = 28) groups by training age. All athletes underwent whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans and lower-body peripheral quantitative computed tomography tibial scans on the kicking and support limbs. RESULTS: Significant interactions between training age and limb function were evident across all skeletal parameters (F16, 91 = 0.182, P = 0.031, Wilks Λ = 0.969). Asymmetries between limbs were significantly larger in the more experienced players than the less experienced players for tibial mass (P ≤ 0.044, d ≥ 0.50), total cross-sectional area (P ≤ 0.039, d ≥ 0.53), and stress-strain indices (P ≤ 0.050, d ≥ 0.42). No significant asymmetry was evident for total volumetric density. More experienced players also exhibited greater lower-body tibial mass (P ≤ 0.001, d ≥ 1.22), volumetric density (P ≤ 0.009, d ≥ 0.79), cross-sectional area (P ≤ 0.387, d ≥ 0.21), stress-strain indices (P ≤ 0.012, d ≥ 0.69), fracture loads (P ≤ 0.018, d ≥ 0.57), and muscle mass and cross-sectional area (P ≤ 0.016, d ≥ 0.68) than less experienced players. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetries were evident in athletes as a product of limb function over time. Chronic exposure to routine high-impact gravitational loads afforded to the support limb preferentially improved bone mass and structure (cross-sectional area and cortex thickness) as potent contributors to bone strength relative to the high-magnitude muscular loads predominantly afforded to the kicking limb.
Authors: Nicolas H Hart; Robert U Newton; Nigel A Spry; Dennis R Taaffe; Suzanne K Chambers; Kynan T Feeney; David J Joseph; Andrew D Redfern; Tom Ferguson; Daniel A Galvão Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Giampiero Ascenzi; Cristoforo Filetti; Valter Di Salvo; F Javier Nuñez; Luis Suarez-Arrones; Bruno Ruscello; Fabio Massimo Francioni; Alberto Mendez Villanueva Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Breanne S Baker; Zhaojing Chen; Rebecca D Larson; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: N H Hart; S Nimphius; T Rantalainen; A Ireland; A Siafarikas; R U Newton Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Irineu Loturco; Lucas A Pereira; Ronaldo Kobal; Cesar C C Abad; Marcelo Rosseti; Felipe P Carpes; Chris Bishop Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 2.806