Margaret Murphy1, Kate Curtis2, Mary K Lam3, Cameron S Palmer4, Jeremy Hsu5, Andrea McCloughen6. 1. Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Australia; Emergency Department, Westmead Hospital, Australia. Electronic address: Margaret.Murphy@health.nsw.gov.au. 2. Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Australia; Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven, Australia. 3. Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. 4. Trauma Service, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Trauma Service, Westmead Hospital, Australia. 6. Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Simulation has been promoted as a platform for training trauma teams. However, it is not clear if this training has an impact on health service delivery and patient outcomes. This study evaluates the association between implementation of a simulation based multidisciplinary trauma team training program at a metropolitan trauma centre and subsequent patient outcomes. METHOD: This was a retrospective review of trauma registry data collected at an 850-bed Level 1 Adult Trauma Centre in Sydney, Australia. Two concurrent four-year periods, before and after implementation of a simulation based multidisciplinary trauma team training program were compared for differences in time to critical operations, Emergency Department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and patient mortality. RESULTS: There were 2389 major trauma patients admitted to the hospital during the study, 1116 in the four years preceding trauma team training (the PREgroup) and 1273 in the subsequent 4 years (the POST group). There were no differences between the groups with respect to gender, body region injured, incidence of polytrauma, and pattern of arrival to ED. The POST group was older (median age 54 versus 43 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of falls and assaults (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in time to critical operation, from 2.63 h (IQR 1.23-5.12) in the PRE-group to 0.55 h (IQR 0.22-1.27) in the POST-group, p < 0.001. The overall ED LOS increased, and there was no reduction in mortality. Post-hoc analysis found LOS in ED was reduced in the cohort requiring critical operations, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The implementation of trauma team training was associated with a reduction in time to critical operation while overall ED length of stay increased. Simulation is promoted as a platform for training teams; but the complexity of trauma care challenges efforts to demonstrate direct links between multidisciplinary team training and improved outcomes. There remain considerable gaps in knowledge as to how team training impacts health service delivery and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative therapeutic/care management study, Level III evidence. Crown
BACKGROUND: Simulation has been promoted as a platform for training trauma teams. However, it is not clear if this training has an impact on health service delivery and patient outcomes. This study evaluates the association between implementation of a simulation based multidisciplinary trauma team training program at a metropolitan trauma centre and subsequent patient outcomes. METHOD: This was a retrospective review of trauma registry data collected at an 850-bed Level 1 Adult Trauma Centre in Sydney, Australia. Two concurrent four-year periods, before and after implementation of a simulation based multidisciplinary trauma team training program were compared for differences in time to critical operations, Emergency Department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and patient mortality. RESULTS: There were 2389 major traumapatients admitted to the hospital during the study, 1116 in the four years preceding trauma team training (the PREgroup) and 1273 in the subsequent 4 years (the POST group). There were no differences between the groups with respect to gender, body region injured, incidence of polytrauma, and pattern of arrival to ED. The POST group was older (median age 54 versus 43 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of falls and assaults (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in time to critical operation, from 2.63 h (IQR 1.23-5.12) in the PRE-group to 0.55 h (IQR 0.22-1.27) in the POST-group, p < 0.001. The overall ED LOS increased, and there was no reduction in mortality. Post-hoc analysis found LOS in ED was reduced in the cohort requiring critical operations, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The implementation of trauma team training was associated with a reduction in time to critical operation while overall ED length of stay increased. Simulation is promoted as a platform for training teams; but the complexity of trauma care challenges efforts to demonstrate direct links between multidisciplinary team training and improved outcomes. There remain considerable gaps in knowledge as to how team training impacts health service delivery and patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative therapeutic/care management study, Level III evidence. Crown
Authors: Jeannie L Callum; Calvin H Yeh; Andrew Petrosoniak; Mark J McVey; Stephanie Cope; Troy Thompson; Victoria Chin; Keyvan Karkouti; Avery B Nathens; Kimmo Murto; Suzanne Beno; Jacob Pendergrast; Andrew McDonald; Russell MacDonald; Neill K J Adhikari; Asim Alam; Donald Arnold; Lee Barratt; Andrew Beckett; Sue Brenneman; Hina Razzaq Chaudhry; Allison Collins; Margaret Harvey; Jacinthe Lampron; Clarita Margarido; Amanda McFarlan; Barto Nascimento; Wendy Owens; Menaka Pai; Sandro Rizoli; Theodora Ruijs; Robert Skeate; Teresa Skelton; Michelle Sholzberg; Kelly Syer; Jami-Lynn Viveiros; Josee Theriault; Alan Tinmouth; Rardi Van Heest; Susan White; Michelle Zeller; Katerina Pavenski Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-09-03
Authors: Emily C Alberto; Michael J Amberson; Megan Cheng; Ivan Marsic; Arunachalam A Thenappan; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Karen J O'Connell; Randall S Burd Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Aaron R Jensen; Cory McLaughlin; Haris Subacius; Katie McAuliff; Avery B Nathens; Carolyn Wong; Daniella Meeker; Randall S Burd; Henri R Ford; Jeffrey S Upperman Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Michael Noonan; Alexander Olaussen; Joseph Mathew; Biswadev Mitra; De Villiers Smit; Mark Fitzgerald Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Femke S Dijkstra; Peter G Renden; Martijn Meeter; Linda J Schoonmade; Ralf Krage; Hans van Schuppen; Anne de la Croix Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Blanca Larraga-García; Luis Castañeda López; Francisco Javier Rubio Bolívar; Manuel Quintana-Díaz; Álvaro Gutiérrez Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2021-09-25 Impact factor: 4.460