Emily C Alberto1, Michael J Amberson2, Megan Cheng1, Ivan Marsic3, Arunachalam A Thenappan1, Aleksandra Sarcevic4, Karen J O'Connell5, Randall S Burd6. 1. Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey. 4. College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. 6. Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: rburd@childrensnational.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intubation in the early postinjury phase can be a high-risk procedure associated with an increased risk of mortality when delayed. Nonroutine events (NREs) are workflow disruptions that can be latent safety threats in high-risk settings and may contribute to adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed videos of intubations of injured children (age<17 y old) in the emergency department occurring between 2014 and 2018 to identify NREs occurring between the decision to intubate and successful intubation ("critical window"). RESULTS: Among 34 children requiring intubation, the indications included GCS≤8 (n = 20, 58.8%), cardiac arrest (n = 6, 17.6%), airway protection (n = 5, 14.7%), and respiratory failure (n = 3, 8.8%). The median duration of the "critical window" was 7.5 min (range 1.4-27.5 min), with a median of six NREs per case in this period (range 2-30). Most NREs (n = 159, 61.9%) delayed workflow, with 31 (12.1%) of these delays each lasting more than one minute. Eighty-seven NREs (33.9%) had a potential for harm but did not lead to direct patient harm. The most common NREs directly related to the intubation process were poor positioning for intubation (n = 23, 8.9%) and difficulty passing the endotracheal tube (n = 5, 1.9%), with most being attributed to the anesthesiologist performing the intubation (n = 51, range 0-7). CONCLUSIONS: Workflow disruptions related to nonroutine events were frequent during pediatric trauma intubation and were often associated with delays and potential for patient harm. Interventions for improving the efficiency and timeliness of the critical window should focus on adherence to intubation protocol and improving communication and teamwork related to tasks in this phase.
BACKGROUND: Intubation in the early postinjury phase can be a high-risk procedure associated with an increased risk of mortality when delayed. Nonroutine events (NREs) are workflow disruptions that can be latent safety threats in high-risk settings and may contribute to adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed videos of intubations of injured children (age<17 y old) in the emergency department occurring between 2014 and 2018 to identify NREs occurring between the decision to intubate and successful intubation ("critical window"). RESULTS: Among 34 children requiring intubation, the indications included GCS≤8 (n = 20, 58.8%), cardiac arrest (n = 6, 17.6%), airway protection (n = 5, 14.7%), and respiratory failure (n = 3, 8.8%). The median duration of the "critical window" was 7.5 min (range 1.4-27.5 min), with a median of six NREs per case in this period (range 2-30). Most NREs (n = 159, 61.9%) delayed workflow, with 31 (12.1%) of these delays each lasting more than one minute. Eighty-seven NREs (33.9%) had a potential for harm but did not lead to direct patient harm. The most common NREs directly related to the intubation process were poor positioning for intubation (n = 23, 8.9%) and difficulty passing the endotracheal tube (n = 5, 1.9%), with most being attributed to the anesthesiologist performing the intubation (n = 51, range 0-7). CONCLUSIONS: Workflow disruptions related to nonroutine events were frequent during pediatric trauma intubation and were often associated with delays and potential for patient harm. Interventions for improving the efficiency and timeliness of the critical window should focus on adherence to intubation protocol and improving communication and teamwork related to tasks in this phase.
Authors: Benjamin T Kerrey; Andrea S Rinderknecht; Gary L Geis; Lise E Nigrovic; Matthew R Mittiga Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Julia C Seelandt; Franziska Tschan; Sandra Keller; Guido Beldi; Nadja Jenni; Anita Kurmann; Daniel Candinas; Norbert K Semmer Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: J R Clarke; B Spejewski; A S Gertner; B L Webber; C Z Hayward; T A Santora; D K Wagner; C C Baker; H R Champion; T C Fabian; F R Lewis; E E Moore; J A Weigelt; A B Eastman; C Blank-Reid Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Margaret Murphy; Kate Curtis; Mary K Lam; Cameron S Palmer; Jeremy Hsu; Andrea McCloughen Journal: Injury Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Julie Mayglothling; Therese M Duane; Michael Gibbs; Maureen McCunn; Eric Legome; Alexander L Eastman; James Whelan; Kaushal H Shah Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Kathryn M Kellogg; Joseph S Puthumana; Allan Fong; Katharine T Adams; Raj M Ratwani Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: Angela Mastrianni; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Lauren S Chung; Issa Zakeri; Emily C Alberto; Zachary P Milestone; Randall S Burd; Ivan Marsic Journal: DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf) Date: 2021-06-28