Hyungdong Kim1, Byungyong Kim2, Jonggeun Baek3, Youngkee Oh4, Sangmo Yun1, Hyunsoo Jang3. 1. 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Daegu Fatima Hospital , Daegu , South Korea. 2. 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Semyung Christianity Hospital , Pohang , South Korea. 3. 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital , Gyeongju , South Korea. 4. 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University College of Medicine , Daegu , South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To install a low-Z target on the wedge tray mount of a medical linear accelerator to create a new image beam and to confirm image contrast enhancement. METHODS: Experimental low-energy photon beams were produced with the linac running in the 6 MeV electron mode and with a low-Z target installed on the wedge tray mount [denoted 6 MeV (low-Z target)]. Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation was performed to analyse the energy spectrum and image contrast of a 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam. This study modelled the 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam and the 6 MV (megavoltage) radiotherapy photon beam and verified model validity by measurement. In addition, a contrast phantom was modelled to quantitatively compare the image contrasts of the 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam and the 6 MV radiotherapy photon beam. A low-Z target was fabricated to generate low-energy photons (25-150 keV) from incident electrons, and a portal image of the Alderson RANDO phantom was acquired using a clinical linear accelerator for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The measured and calculated percentage depth dose of the 6 MV photon and 6 MeV (Al) beams were consistent within 1.5 and 1.6%, respectively, and calculated lateral profiles of the 6 MV photon beam and the 6 MeV (Al) beam were consistent with the measured results within 1.5 and 1.9%, respectively. Although low-energy photons (25-150 keV) of the 6 MV photon beam were only 0.3%, the Be, C, and Al low-Z targets, but not the Ti target, generated 34.4 to 38.5% low-energy photons. In 5 to 20 cm water phantoms, contrast of the 6 MeV (Al) beam was approximately 1.16 times greater than that of the 6 MV beam. The contrasts of 6 MeV (Al) and 6 MV photon beams in the 20 cm water phantom were ~34% lower than those in the 5 cm water phantom. 6 MeV (Al)/CR (computed radiography) images of the human body phantom were more vivid and detailed than 6 MV/EPID (electronic portal imaging device) and 6 MeV (Al)/EPID images. CONCLUSION: The experimental beam with a low-Z target, which was simply installed on the wedge tray mount of the radiotherapy linear accelerator, generated significantly more low-energy photons than the 6 MV radiotherapy photon beam, and provided better quality portal images. Advances in knowledge: This study shows that, unlike the existing low-Z beam studies, a low-Z target can be installed outside the head of a linear accelerator to improve portal image quality.
OBJECTIVE: To install a low-Z target on the wedge tray mount of a medical linear accelerator to create a new image beam and to confirm image contrast enhancement. METHODS: Experimental low-energy photon beams were produced with the linac running in the 6 MeV electron mode and with a low-Z target installed on the wedge tray mount [denoted 6 MeV (low-Z target)]. Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation was performed to analyse the energy spectrum and image contrast of a 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam. This study modelled the 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam and the 6 MV (megavoltage) radiotherapy photon beam and verified model validity by measurement. In addition, a contrast phantom was modelled to quantitatively compare the image contrasts of the 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam and the 6 MV radiotherapy photon beam. A low-Z target was fabricated to generate low-energy photons (25-150 keV) from incident electrons, and a portal image of the Alderson RANDO phantom was acquired using a clinical linear accelerator for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The measured and calculated percentage depth dose of the 6 MV photon and 6 MeV (Al) beams were consistent within 1.5 and 1.6%, respectively, and calculated lateral profiles of the 6 MV photon beam and the 6 MeV (Al) beam were consistent with the measured results within 1.5 and 1.9%, respectively. Although low-energy photons (25-150 keV) of the 6 MV photon beam were only 0.3%, the Be, C, and Al low-Z targets, but not the Ti target, generated 34.4 to 38.5% low-energy photons. In 5 to 20 cm water phantoms, contrast of the 6 MeV (Al) beam was approximately 1.16 times greater than that of the 6 MV beam. The contrasts of 6 MeV (Al) and 6 MV photon beams in the 20 cm water phantom were ~34% lower than those in the 5 cm water phantom. 6 MeV (Al)/CR (computed radiography) images of the human body phantom were more vivid and detailed than 6 MV/EPID (electronic portal imaging device) and 6 MeV (Al)/EPID images. CONCLUSION: The experimental beam with a low-Z target, which was simply installed on the wedge tray mount of the radiotherapy linear accelerator, generated significantly more low-energy photons than the 6 MV radiotherapy photon beam, and provided better quality portal images. Advances in knowledge: This study shows that, unlike the existing low-Z beam studies, a low-Z target can be installed outside the head of a linear accelerator to improve portal image quality.