Peter D Sottile1, David Albers2, Carrie Higgins1, Jeffery Mckeehan1, Marc M Moss1. 1. Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 2. Department of Biomedical Information, University of Columbia, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ventilator dyssynchrony is potentially harmful to patients with or at risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Automated detection of ventilator dyssynchrony from ventilator waveforms has been difficult. It is unclear if certain types of ventilator dyssynchrony deliver large tidal volumes and whether levels of sedation alter the frequency of ventilator dyssynchrony. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A university medical ICU. PATIENTS: Patients with or at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Continuous pressure-time, flow-time, and volume-time data were directly obtained from the ventilator. The level of sedation and the use of neuromuscular blockade was extracted from the medical record. Machine learning algorithms that incorporate clinical insight were developed and trained to detect four previously described and clinically relevant forms of ventilator dyssynchrony. The association between normalized tidal volume and ventilator dyssynchrony and the association between sedation and the frequency of ventilator dyssynchrony were determined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 4.26 million breaths were recorded from 62 ventilated patients. Our algorithm detected three types of ventilator dyssynchrony with an area under the receiver operator curve of greater than 0.89. Ventilator dyssynchrony occurred in 34.4% (95% CI, 34.41-34.49%) of breaths. When compared with synchronous breaths, double-triggered and flow-limited breaths were more likely to deliver tidal volumes greater than 10 mL/kg (40% and 11% compared with 0.2%; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Deep sedation reduced but did not eliminate the frequency of all ventilator dyssynchrony breaths (p < 0.05). Ventilator dyssynchrony was eliminated with neuromuscular blockade (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We developed a computerized algorithm that accurately detects three types of ventilator dyssynchrony. Double-triggered and flow-limited breaths are associated with the frequent delivery of tidal volumes of greater than 10 mL/kg. Although ventilator dyssynchrony is reduced by deep sedation, potentially deleterious tidal volumes may still be delivered. However, neuromuscular blockade effectively eliminates ventilator dyssynchrony.
OBJECTIVE:Ventilator dyssynchrony is potentially harmful to patients with or at risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Automated detection of ventilator dyssynchrony from ventilator waveforms has been difficult. It is unclear if certain types of ventilator dyssynchrony deliver large tidal volumes and whether levels of sedation alter the frequency of ventilator dyssynchrony. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A university medical ICU. PATIENTS: Patients with or at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Continuous pressure-time, flow-time, and volume-time data were directly obtained from the ventilator. The level of sedation and the use of neuromuscular blockade was extracted from the medical record. Machine learning algorithms that incorporate clinical insight were developed and trained to detect four previously described and clinically relevant forms of ventilator dyssynchrony. The association between normalized tidal volume and ventilator dyssynchrony and the association between sedation and the frequency of ventilator dyssynchrony were determined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 4.26 million breaths were recorded from 62 ventilated patients. Our algorithm detected three types of ventilator dyssynchrony with an area under the receiver operator curve of greater than 0.89. Ventilator dyssynchrony occurred in 34.4% (95% CI, 34.41-34.49%) of breaths. When compared with synchronous breaths, double-triggered and flow-limited breaths were more likely to deliver tidal volumes greater than 10 mL/kg (40% and 11% compared with 0.2%; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Deep sedation reduced but did not eliminate the frequency of all ventilator dyssynchrony breaths (p < 0.05). Ventilator dyssynchrony was eliminated with neuromuscular blockade (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We developed a computerized algorithm that accurately detects three types of ventilator dyssynchrony. Double-triggered and flow-limited breaths are associated with the frequent delivery of tidal volumes of greater than 10 mL/kg. Although ventilator dyssynchrony is reduced by deep sedation, potentially deleterious tidal volumes may still be delivered. However, neuromuscular blockade effectively eliminates ventilator dyssynchrony.
Authors: Peter M Spieth; Alysson R Carvalho; Paolo Pelosi; Catharina Hoehn; Christoph Meissner; Michael Kasper; Matthias Hübler; Matthias von Neindorff; Constanze Dassow; Martina Barrenschee; Stefan Uhlig; Thea Koch; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lluís Blanch; Ana Villagra; Bernat Sales; Jaume Montanya; Umberto Lucangelo; Manel Luján; Oscar García-Esquirol; Encarna Chacón; Anna Estruga; Joan C Oliva; Alberto Hernández-Abadia; Guillermo M Albaiceta; Enrique Fernández-Mondejar; Rafael Fernández; Josefina Lopez-Aguilar; Jesús Villar; Gastón Murias; Robert M Kacmarek Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Mark C Pohlman; Kathryn E McCallister; William D Schweickert; Anne S Pohlman; Celerina P Nigos; Jerry A Krishnan; Jeff T Charbeneau; Brian K Gehlbach; John P Kress; Jesse B Hall Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gerald Chanques; John P Kress; Anne Pohlman; Shruti Patel; Jason Poston; Samir Jaber; Jesse B Hall Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marc Moss; David T Huang; Roy G Brower; Niall D Ferguson; Adit A Ginde; M N Gong; Colin K Grissom; Stephanie Gundel; Douglas Hayden; R Duncan Hite; Peter C Hou; Catherine L Hough; Theodore J Iwashyna; Akram Khan; Kathleen D Liu; Daniel Talmor; B Taylor Thompson; Christine A Ulysse; Donald M Yealy; Derek C Angus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-05-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brian Murray; Andrea Sikora; Jason R Mock; Thomas Devlin; Kelli Keats; Rebecca Powell; Thomas Bice Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 5.988
Authors: Gregory B Rehm; Sang Hoon Woo; Xin Luigi Chen; Brooks T Kuhn; Irene Cortes-Puch; Nicholas R Anderson; Jason Y Adams; Chen-Nee Chuah Journal: IEEE Pervasive Comput Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 1.603
Authors: Gregory B Rehm; Irene Cortés-Puch; Brooks T Kuhn; Jimmy Nguyen; Sarina A Fazio; Michael A Johnson; Nicholas R Anderson; Chen-Nee Chuah; Jason Y Adams Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-01-08