Literature DB >> 29334158

Growth of liver allografts over time in pediatric transplant recipients.

S G Chaudhry1, S Bentley-Hibbert2, J Stern3, S Lobritto4, M Martinez4, J Vittorio4, K J Halazun5, H T Lee6, J Emond1, T Kato1, B Samstein5, A Griesemer1.   

Abstract

The liver's capacity to grow in response to metabolic need is well known. However, long-term growth of liver allografts in pediatric recipients has not been characterized. A retrospective review of pediatric recipients at a single institution identified patients who had cross-sectional imaging at 1, 5, and 10 years post-transplant. Using volumetric calculations, liver allograft size was calculated and percent SLV were compared across the different time points; 18 patients ranging from 0.3 to 17.7 years old were identified that had imaging at 2 or more time points. Measured liver volumes increased by 59% after 5 years and 170% after 10 years. The measured liver volumes compared to calculated %SLV for these patients were 123 ± 37%, 97 ± 19%, and 118 ± 27% at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplant, respectively. Our data suggest that liver allografts in pediatric recipients increase along with overall growth, and reach SLVs for height and weight by 5 years post-transplantation. Additionally, as pediatric recipients grow, the livers appear to maintain appropriate SLV.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  growth patterns; liver transplantation; outcome; pediatric liver; transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29334158      PMCID: PMC5820167          DOI: 10.1111/petr.13104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  24 in total

1.  Standard liver volume in the Caucasian population.

Authors:  A Heinemann; F Wischhusen; K Püschel; X Rogiers
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Split-liver transplantation: a review.

Authors:  John F Renz; Hasan Yersiz; Paulo R Reichert; Garrett M Hisatake; Douglas G Farmer; Jean C Emond; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  A hundred years of the hepatotrophic controversy.

Authors:  T E Starzl; K A Porter; J A Francavilla; J Benichou; C W Putnam
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1977

4.  Human liver regeneration after major hepatic resection. A study of normal liver and livers with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  N Nagasue; H Yukaya; Y Ogawa; H Kohno; T Nakamura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Insulin, glucagon, and the control of hepatic structure, function, and capacity for regeneration.

Authors:  T E Starzl; K A Porter; C W Putnam
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 8.694

6.  Effect of portal hemodynamics on liver regeneration studied in a novel portohepatic shunt rat model.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Masato Sakon; Hiroaki Nagano; Kunihito Gotoh; Kazuhiko Hashimoto; Masaru Kubota; Shogo Kobayashi; Shinji Yamamoto; Atsushi Miyamoto; Keizo Dono; Shoji Nakamori; Koji Umeshita; Morito Monden
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Delayed primary closure and the incidence of surgical complications in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  William A Ziaziaris; Alexandre Darani; Andrew J A Holland; Angus Alexander; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Albert Shun; Gordon Thomas
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Liver transplantation in children from living related donors. Surgical techniques and results.

Authors:  C E Broelsch; P F Whitington; J C Emond; T G Heffron; J R Thistlethwaite; L Stevens; J Piper; S H Whitington; J L Lichtor
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Liver regeneration after adult living donor and deceased donor split-liver transplants.

Authors:  Abhinav Humar; Kambiz Kosari; Timothy D Sielaff; Brooke Glessing; Maria Gomes; Charles Dietz; Galia Rosen; John Lake; William D Payne
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Analysis of liver regeneration in mice lacking type 1 or type 2 tumor necrosis factor receptor: requirement for type 1 but not type 2 receptor.

Authors:  Y Yamada; E M Webber; I Kirillova; J J Peschon; N Fausto
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.