Literature DB >> 15004764

Liver regeneration after adult living donor and deceased donor split-liver transplants.

Abhinav Humar1, Kambiz Kosari, Timothy D Sielaff, Brooke Glessing, Maria Gomes, Charles Dietz, Galia Rosen, John Lake, William D Payne.   

Abstract

As the number of living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD) split-liver transplants (SLTs) have increased over the last 5 years, so too has the interest in liver regeneration after such partial-liver transplants. We looked at liver regeneration, as measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetrics, to see if there were significant differences among LDs, right-lobe LD recipients, and SLT recipients. We measured liver volume at 3 months postoperatively by using CT, and we compared the result to the patient's ideal liver volume (ILV), which was calculated using a standard equation. The study group consisted of 70 adult patients who either had donated their right lobe for LD transplants (n = 24) or had undergone a partial-liver transplant (right-lobe LD transplants, n = 24; right-lobe SLTs, n = 11; left-lobe SLTs, n = 11). DD (vs. LDs) were younger (P < 0.01), were heavier (P = 0.06), and had longer ischemic times (P < 0.01). At 3 months postoperatively, LDs had attained 78.6% of their ILV, less than the percentage for right-lobe LD recipients (103.9%; P = 0.0002), right-lobe SLT recipients (113.6%; P = 0.01), and left-lobe SLT recipients (119.7%; P = 0.0006). When liver size at the third postoperative month was compared with the liver size immediately postoperatively, LDs had a 1.85-fold increase. This was smaller than the increase seen in right-lobe LD recipients (2.08-fold), right-lobe SLT recipients (2.17-fold), and left-lobe SLT recipients (2.52-fold). In conclusion, liver regeneration, as measured by CT volume, seems to be greatest in SLT recipients. LD recipients seem to have greater liver growth than their donors. The reason for this remains unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15004764     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  18 in total

1.  Liver regeneration in donors evaluated by Tc-99m-GSA scintigraphy after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Masaki Kaibori; Sang Kil Ha-Kawa; Yoichiro Uchida; Morihiko Ishizaki; Takamichi Saito; Kosuke Matsui; Junko Hirohara; Koichi Tanaka; Yasuo Kamiyama
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Jean C Emond; Tempie H Shearon; Greg Everson; Talia B Baker; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Kinetics of liver regeneration in donors after living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective analysis of "2/3rd partial hepatectomy" model at 3 months.

Authors:  Shailesh Anand Sable; Sharad Maheshwari; Swapnil Sharma; Kapildev Yadav; Ashutosh Chauhan; Sorabh Kapoor; Vibha Varma; Vinay Kumaran
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-29

4.  Functional elements associated with hepatic regeneration in living donors after right hepatic lobectomy.

Authors:  Gregory T Everson; John C Hoefs; Claus U Niemann; Kim M Olthoff; Robert Dupuis; Shannon Lauriski; Andrea Herman; Norah Milne; Brenda W Gillespie; Nathan P Goodrich; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Convergence process of volumetric liver regeneration after living-donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Taku Aoki; Hiroshi Imamura; Yutaka Matsuyama; Yoji Kishi; Takashi Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Effect of non-alcoholic liver disease on recurrence rate and liver regeneration after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  N W Molla; M M Hassanain; Z Fadel; L M Boucher; A Madkhali; R M Altahan; E A Alrijraji; E B Simoneau; H Alamri; A Salman; Z Gao; P P Metrakos
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Significance and mechanism of CYP7a1 gene regulation during the acute phase of liver regeneration.

Authors:  Lisheng Zhang; Xiongfei Huang; Zhipeng Meng; Bingning Dong; Steven Shiah; David D Moore; Wendong Huang
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-12-04

8.  A complement-dependent balance between hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury and liver regeneration in mice.

Authors:  Songqing He; Carl Atkinson; Fei Qiao; Katherine Cianflone; Xiaoping Chen; Stephen Tomlinson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Ya Li; Xiang Lan; Yong-Gang Wei; Bo Li; Lv-Nan Yan; Tian-Fu Wen; Ji-Chun Zhao; Ming-Qing Xu; Wen-Tao Wang; Jia-Yin Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Growth of liver allografts over time in pediatric transplant recipients.

Authors:  S G Chaudhry; S Bentley-Hibbert; J Stern; S Lobritto; M Martinez; J Vittorio; K J Halazun; H T Lee; J Emond; T Kato; B Samstein; A Griesemer
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2018-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.