Literature DB >> 29334155

Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition.

Witold X Chmielewski1, Moritz Mückschel1,2, Christian Beste1.   

Abstract

The inhibition of prepotent responses is a requirement for goal-directed behavior and several factors determine corresponding successful response inhibition processes. One factor relates to the degree of automaticity of pre-potent response tendencies and another factor relates to the degree of cognitive control that is exerted during response inhibition. However, both factors can conjointly modulate inhibitory control. Cognitive theoretical concepts suggest that codings of stimulus-response translations may underlie such conjoint effects. Yet, it is unclear in how far such specific codes, as assumed in cognitive psychological concepts, are evident in neurophysiological processes and whether there are specific functional neuroanatomical structures associated with the processing of such codes. Applying a temporal decomposition method of EEG data in combination with source localization methods we show that there are different, intermingled codes (i.e., "stimulus codes" and "response selection codes") at the neurophysiological level during conjoint effects of "automatic" and "controlled" processes in response inhibition. Importantly, only "response selection codes" predict behavioral performance, and are subject to conjoint modulations by "automatic" and "controlled" processes. These modulations are associated with inferior and superior parietal areas (BA40/BA7), possibly reflecting an updating of internal representations when information is complex and probably difficult to categorize, but essential for behavioral control. Codes proposed by cognitive, psychological concepts seem to have a neurophysiological analogue that fits into current views on functions of inferior and superior parietal regions.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; response inhibition; source localization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29334155      PMCID: PMC6866562          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  58 in total

1.  Concurrent information affects response inhibition processes via the modulation of theta oscillations in cognitive control networks.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Gabriel Dippel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study.

Authors:  Gabriel Dippel; Witold Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Neural correlates of inhibitory control and visual processing in youths with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a counting Stroop functional MRI study.

Authors:  L-Y Fan; S S-F Gau; T-L Chou
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 4.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments.

Authors:  Guang Ouyang; Annekathrin Schacht; Changsong Zhou; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading.

Authors:  Moritz Mückschel; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Developmental changes in within- and between-network connectivity between late childhood and adulthood.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.

Authors:  Andrea Bari; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation.

Authors:  Rene J Huster; Sergey M Plis; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  20 in total

1.  The neurophysiological basis of developmental changes during sequential cognitive flexibility between adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Franziska Giller; Rui Zhang; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.

Authors:  Nico Adelhöfer; Krutika Gohil; Susanne Passow; Benjamin Teufert; Veit Roessner; Shu-Chen Li; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  How non-veridical perception drives actions in healthy humans: evidence from synaesthesia.

Authors:  Marie Luise Schreiter; Witold X Chmielewski; Jamie Ward; Christian Beste
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Decoding Stimulus-Response Representations and Their Stability Using EEG-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-05-07

6.  A comparative study on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying effects of methylphenidate and neurofeedback on inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Julia Friedrich; Marie Luise Schreiter; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Paradoxical response inhibition advantages in adolescent obsessive compulsive disorder result from the interplay of automatic and controlled processes.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Witold Chmielewski; Judith Buse; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Alcohol Hangover Slightly Impairs Response Selection but not Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Antje Opitz; Jan Hubert; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Pushing to the Limits: What Processes during Cognitive Control are Enhanced by Reaction-Time Feedback?

Authors:  Astrid Prochnow; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-04-07

10.  Catecholaminergic Modulation of Conflict Control Depends on the Source of Conflicts.

Authors:  Wiebke Bensmann; Veit Roessner; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.