Literature DB >> 26608829

Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study.

Gabriel Dippel1, Witold Chmielewski1, Moritz Mückschel1, Christian Beste2.   

Abstract

Response inhibition processes are one of the most important executive control functions and have been subject to intense research in cognitive neuroscience. However, knowledge on the neurophysiology and functional neuroanatomy on response inhibition is biased because studies usually employ experimental paradigms (e.g., sustained attention to response task, SART) in which behavior is susceptible to impulsive errors. Here, we investigate whether there are differences in neurophysiological mechanisms and networks depending on the response mode that predominates behavior in a response inhibition task. We do so comparing a SART with a traditionally formatted task paradigm. We use EEG-beamforming in two tasks inducing opposite response modes during action selection. We focus on theta frequency modulations, since these are implicated in cognitive control processes. The results show that a response mode that is susceptible to impulsive errors (response mode used in the SART) is associated with stronger theta band activity in the left temporo-parietal junction. The results suggest that the response modes applied during response inhibition differ in the encoding of surprise signals, or related processes of attentional sampling. Response modes during response inhibition seem to differ in processes necessary to update task representations relevant to behavioral control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beamforming; EEG; Response inhibition; Temporo-parietal junction; Theta frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26608829     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  25 in total

1.  On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.

Authors:  Benjamin Bodmer; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.

Authors:  Nico Adelhöfer; Krutika Gohil; Susanne Passow; Benjamin Teufert; Veit Roessner; Shu-Chen Li; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The norepinephrine system affects specific neurophysiological subprocesses in the modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Tjalf Ziemssen; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses.

Authors:  Moritz Mückschel; Gabriel Dippel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control.

Authors:  Charlotte Pscherer; Moritz Mückschel; Lena Summerer; Annet Bluschke; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The interplay of resting and inhibitory control-related theta-band activity depends on age.

Authors:  Charlotte Pscherer; Annet Bluschke; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  On the effects of multimodal information integration in multitasking.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Krutika Gohil; René J Huster; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Response inhibition in Attention deficit disorder and neurofibromatosis type 1 - clinically similar, neurophysiologically different.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Maja von der Hagen; Katharina Papenhagen; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.