Literature DB >> 29333137

Highlight report: Intratumoral metabolomic heterogeneity of breast cancer.

Regina Stoeber1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29333137      PMCID: PMC5763078          DOI: 10.17179/excli2017-1045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXCLI J        ISSN: 1611-2156            Impact factor:   4.068


× No keyword cloud information.



Recently, Mikheil Gogiashvili and colleagues from TU-Dortmund have published a study about the metabolomics heterogeneity of breast cancer (Gogiashvili et al., 2017[8]). The background of this study is the practically relevant question, whether measurement of a single biopsy is sufficient when analyzing tumors from a cohort of patients. In recent years metabolic profiling by high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been increasingly used to characterize the metabolome of breast cancer (Sitter et al., 2010[19]; Giskeodegard et al., 2012[7]; Cao et al., 2012[3]; Choi et al., 2012[4]; 2013[5]). However, so far only a single study has addressed the possible influence of metabolic heterogeneity within a single breast tumor (Park et al., 2016[17]). Therefore, the authors performed multi-core sampling of six small specimens from individual tumors and quantified 32 metabolites. Not unexpectedly, the intertumoral differences were larger compared to intratumoral differences (Gogiashvili et al., 2017[8]). More importantly, a random forest- classifier trained on a sample set of individual tumors correctly predicted tumor identity of an additional set of independent cores from the same tumors (Gogiashvili et al., 2017[8]). Therefore, the study shows that despite the intratumoral heterogeneity the analysis of only one or few replicates per tumor can be justified. This is of high relevance, when large cohorts of patients have to be analyzed. Currently, the majority of prognostic studies with cancer patients has been performed based on mRNA (Grinberg et al., 2017[10]; 2015[9]; Marchan et al., 2017[15]; Cadenas et al., 2014[2]; Ghallab et al., 2015[6]; Lohr et al., 2015[14]; Hellwig et al., 2016[13]; Stock et al., 2015[20]; Hammad et al., 2016[11]) or immunostaining (Heimes et al., 2017[12]; Mattsson et al., 2015[16]; Schmidt et al., 2012[18]; Barone et al., 2016[1]). Studies with metabolic profiling by HR MAS 1H NMR are still relatively rare in breast cancer. Therefore, the present study of Gogiashvili and colleagues represents an important milestone in this field of research.
  20 in total

1.  Lactate and glycine-potential MR biomarkers of prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Guro F Giskeødegård; Steinar Lundgren; Beathe Sitter; Hans E Fjøsne; Geert Postma; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Tone F Bathen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Quantification of metabolites in breast cancer patients with different clinical prognosis using HR MAS MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Beathe Sitter; Tone F Bathen; Trond E Singstad; Hans E Fjøsne; Steinar Lundgren; Jostein Halgunset; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Prognostic significance of interferon regulating factor 4 (IRF4) in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Heimes; K Madjar; K Edlund; M J Battista; K Almstedt; S Gebhard; S Foersch; J Rahnenführer; W Brenner; A Hasenburg; J G Hengstler; M Schmidt
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Predicting long-term survival and treatment response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy by MR metabolic profiling.

Authors:  Maria D Cao; Beathe Sitter; Tone F Bathen; Anna Bofin; Per E Lønning; Steinar Lundgren; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Gelsolin Is Associated with Longer Metastasis-free Survival and Reduced Cell Migration in Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Stock; Franziska Klee; Karolina Edlund; Marianna Grinberg; Seddik Hammad; Rosemarie Marchan; Cristina Cadenas; Bernd Niggemann; Kurt S Zänker; Jörg Rahnenführer; Marcus Schmidt; Jan G Hengstler; Frank Entschladen
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Glycerol-3-phosphate Acyltransferase 1 Promotes Tumor Cell Migration and Poor Survival in Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Rosemarie Marchan; Bettina Büttner; Jörg Lambert; Karolina Edlund; Iris Glaeser; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Gregor Leonhardt; Lisa Marienhoff; Darius Kaszta; Moritz Anft; Carsten Watzl; Katrin Madjar; Marianna Grinberg; Eugen Rempel; Roland Hergenröder; Silvia Selinski; Jörg Rahnenführer; Michaela S Lesjak; Joanna D Stewart; Cristina Cadenas; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Epsin Family Member 3 and Ribosome-Related Genes Are Associated with Late Metastasis in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Long-Term Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Genome-Wide Identification and Validation Strategy.

Authors:  Birte Hellwig; Katrin Madjar; Karolina Edlund; Rosemarie Marchan; Cristina Cadenas; Anne-Sophie Heimes; Katrin Almstedt; Antje Lebrecht; Isabel Sicking; Marco J Battista; Patrick Micke; Marcus Schmidt; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Cadenas; Leonie van de Sandt; Karolina Edlund; Miriam Lohr; Birte Hellwig; Rosemarie Marchan; Marcus Schmidt; Jörg Rahnenführer; Henrik Oster; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Highlight report: Role of the circadian clock system in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Ghallab
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Magnetic resonance metabolic profiling of breast cancer tissue obtained with core needle biopsy for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Hyeon-Man Baek; Suhkmann Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim; Youn Ki Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of WDR5 in breast cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Regina Stoeber
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.068

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.