Recently, Punzi and colleagues published a study about the role of WDR5 in breast cancer metastasis (Punzi et al., 2019[17]). WDR5 is involved in epigenetic regulation complexes and has been reported to influence the expression of numerous genes, including N-cadherin, Snail1 and vimentin (Aho et al., 2019[1]; Ford and Dingwall, 2015[6]; Wu et al., 2011[25]; Chen et al., 2017[5]; Tan et al., 2017[23]). Several studies suggested WDR5 as a therapeutic target (Ye et al., 2019[26][27]; Macdonald et al., 2019[14]; Aho et al., 2019[1]; Zhang et al., 2018[28]; Lu et al., 2018[13]). In their present work, Punzi and colleagues report that downregulation of WDR5 by shRNA in breast cancer cells antagonizes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through re-differentiation and reduces metastasis in a mouse model (Punzi et al., 2019[17]). Moreover, an association of high WDR5 expression with shorter metastasis-free survival was observed in a cohort of breast cancerpatients (Punzi et al., 2019[17]). A further important finding of this study is that WDR5 activates TGFβ in breast cancer and that targeting the WDR5-TGFβ axis by a small molecular inhibitor reduces the migratory potential of breast cancer cells. Metastasis of breast cancer is a complex process (Loi et al., 2019[12]; von Minckwitz et al., 2019[24]; Gogiashvili, 2018[8]; Stoeber, 2017[22]). Besides epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, genes involved in proliferation (Schmidt et al., 2018[19]), immune cell infiltration (Schmidt et al., 2012[18], 2018[19]; Heimes et al., 2017[9][10]; Godoy et al., 2014[7]), oxidative stress response (Cadenas et al., 2010[2], 2014[3], 2019[4]; Hellwig et al., 2016[11]) and inflammatory factors (Mattsson et al., 2015[16]; Sicking et al., 2014[20]) are of relevance; also key enzymes of phosphocholine metabolism have been shown to control breast and ovarian cancer metastasis (Marchan et al., 2017[15]; Stewart et al., 2012[21]). It will be interesting to learn in the next years, whether WDR5 targeting compounds can be identified that have a perspective to be tested in clinical studies.
Authors: Anne-Sophie Heimes; K Madjar; K Edlund; M J Battista; K Almstedt; S Gebhard; S Foersch; J Rahnenführer; W Brenner; A Hasenburg; J G Hengstler; M Schmidt Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Jonathan D Macdonald; Selena Chacón Simon; Changho Han; Feng Wang; J Grace Shaw; Jennifer E Howes; Jiqing Sai; Joannes P Yuh; Demarco Camper; Bethany M Alicie; Joseph Alvarado; Sameer Nikhar; William Payne; Erin R Aho; Joshua A Bauer; Bin Zhao; Jason Phan; Lance R Thomas; Olivia W Rossanese; William P Tansey; Alex G Waterson; Shaun R Stauffer; Stephen W Fesik Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Johanna S M Mattsson; Bengt Bergman; Marianna Grinberg; Karolina Edlund; Millaray Marincevic; Karin Jirström; Fredrik Pontén; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer; Mats G Karlsson; Christina Karlsson; Gisela Helenius; Johan Botling; Patrick Micke; Miklos Gulyas Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Joanna D Stewart; Rosemarie Marchan; Michaela S Lesjak; Joerg Lambert; Roland Hergenroeder; James K Ellis; Chung-Ho Lau; Hector C Keun; Gerd Schmitz; Juergen Schiller; Mandy Eibisch; Christian Hedberg; Herbert Waldmann; Ekkehart Lausch; Berno Tanner; Jalid Sehouli; Jens Sagemueller; Hagen Staude; Eric Steiner; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marcus Schmidt; Veronika Weyer-Elberich; Jan G Hengstler; Anne-Sophie Heimes; Katrin Almstedt; Aslihan Gerhold-Ay; Antje Lebrecht; Marco J Battista; Annette Hasenburg; Ugur Sahin; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; George Fountzilas; Ralph M Wirtz; Heikki Joensuu Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 6.466