Literature DB >> 16095604

Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders' silent reading: a critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis.

Judith A Bowey1, David Muller.   

Abstract

This study examined rapid orthographic learning following silent reading in third-grade children as a function of number of target nonword repetitions and test delay. In each of two test sessions at least 6 days apart, children read a series of short stories, with each story containing a different nonword repeated either four or eight times. In the second session, after the stories had been read, children were asked to read short lists of target nonwords or homophonic alternatives. Children read target nonwords faster than homophones, indicating that they had formed functional orthographic representations of the target nonwords through phonologically recoding them during silent story reading. They also preferred target nonwords to homophones in an orthographic choice task in which the alternatives included the target, the homophone, and a visually similar foil, although here orthographic learning was stronger for items encountered eight times within stories and stronger for items tested immediately. These findings provide critical evidence in support of Share's self-teaching through phonological recoding hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16095604     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  13 in total

1.  Semantic-syntactic partial word knowledge growth through reading.

Authors:  Stacy A Wagovich; Margaret S Hill; Gregory F Petroski
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  An examination of multiple predictors of orthographic functioning.

Authors:  Glenn R Mesman; Michelle Y Kibby
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2010-06-23

Review 3.  Probabilistic modeling of orthographic learning based on visuo-attentional dynamics.

Authors:  Emilie Ginestet; Sylviane Valdois; Julien Diard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  Explanatory multidimensional multilevel random item response model: an application to simultaneous investigation of word and person contributions to multidimensional lexical representations.

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Jennifer K Gilbert; Amanda P Goodwin
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Common variation within the SETBP1 gene is associated with reading-related skills and patterns of functional neural activation.

Authors:  Meaghan V Perdue; Sara Mascheretti; Sergey A Kornilov; Kaja K Jasińska; Kayleigh Ryherd; W Einar Mencl; Stephen J Frost; Elena L Grigorenko; Kenneth R Pugh; Nicole Landi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning.

Authors:  Lindsay N Harris; Charles Perfetti
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-12-23

7.  Orthographic Learning in Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Malin Wass; Teresa Y C Ching; Linda Cupples; Hua-Chen Wang; Björn Lyxell; Louise Martin; Laura Button; Miriam Gunnourie; Isabelle Boisvert; Catherine McMahon; Anne Castles
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Text-fading based training leads to transfer effects on children's sentence reading fluency.

Authors:  Telse Nagler; Sebastian P Korinth; Janosch Linkersdörfer; Jan Lonnemann; Björn Rump; Marcus Hasselhorn; Sven Lindberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Lexical orthography acquisition: Is handwriting better than spelling aloud?

Authors:  Marie-Line Bosse; Nathalie Chaves; Sylviane Valdois
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-10

10.  New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles.

Authors:  Rachel Zoubrinetzky; Frédérique Bielle; Sylviane Valdois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.