Jessica M Hasak1, Carrie L Roth Bettlach1, Katherine B Santosa1, Ellen L Larson2, Jean Stroud3, Susan E Mackinnon4. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Louis, MO. 2. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 3. Center for Advanced Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO. 4. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: Mackinnons@wustl.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our country is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. Although the problem is multifactorial, one issue is the presence of excess prescription opioid medications circulating in our communities. Our objective was to determine whether dissemination of an educational brochure would improve the disposal of unused opioids after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible surgery patients from an upper extremity/peripheral nerve clinic were enrolled into this prospective before and after study between February 2017 and September 2017. Patients who reported opioid use preoperatively were excluded from this study. The same survey was administered to the group of patients who did not receive the intervention and to those who did receive the intervention. Our primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who disposed of unused opioid medications. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were studied: 164 who did not receive the brochure and 170 who received the brochure. Seventy-six patients were excluded for preoperative opioid use. After dissemination of the brochure, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients who disposed of their unused opioids (11% vs 22%, p = 0.02). Of those who disposed of their opioids, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients from each group who disposed in a manner that was recommended by the brochure (43% vs 64%, p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of the educational brochure improved disposal of unused opioids after surgery. This low-cost, easily implemented intervention can improve disposal of unused opioids and ultimately, decrease the amount of excess opioids circulating in our communities.
BACKGROUND: Our country is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. Although the problem is multifactorial, one issue is the presence of excess prescription opioid medications circulating in our communities. Our objective was to determine whether dissemination of an educational brochure would improve the disposal of unused opioids after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible surgery patients from an upper extremity/peripheral nerve clinic were enrolled into this prospective before and after study between February 2017 and September 2017. Patients who reported opioid use preoperatively were excluded from this study. The same survey was administered to the group of patients who did not receive the intervention and to those who did receive the intervention. Our primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who disposed of unused opioid medications. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were studied: 164 who did not receive the brochure and 170 who received the brochure. Seventy-six patients were excluded for preoperative opioid use. After dissemination of the brochure, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients who disposed of their unused opioids (11% vs 22%, p = 0.02). Of those who disposed of their opioids, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients from each group who disposed in a manner that was recommended by the brochure (43% vs 64%, p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of the educational brochure improved disposal of unused opioids after surgery. This low-cost, easily implemented intervention can improve disposal of unused opioids and ultimately, decrease the amount of excess opioids circulating in our communities.
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee; Jenna Goesling; Stephanie Moser; Paul Lin; Michael J Englesbe; Amy S B Bohnert; Sachin Kheterpal; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Kanupriya Kumar; Lawrence V Gulotta; Joshua S Dines; Answorth A Allen; Jennifer Cheng; Kara G Fields; Jacques T YaDeau; Christopher L Wu Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Thomas Ciesielski; Reethi Iyengar; Amit Bothra; Dave Tomala; Geoffrey Cislo; Brian F Gage Journal: Am J Med Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Nayoung Kim; Jonas L Matzon; Jack Abboudi; Christopher Jones; William Kirkpatrick; Charles F Leinberry; Frederic E Liss; Kevin F Lutsky; Mark L Wang; Mitchell Maltenfort; Asif M Ilyas Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Shepard P Johnson; Kevin C Chung; Lin Zhong; Melissa J Shauver; Michael J Engelsbe; Chad Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Ryan Howard; Brian Fry; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Jay Lee; Jennifer Waljee; Chad Brummett; Darrell Campbell; Elizabeth Seese; Michael Englesbe; Joceline Vu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Teresa K L Boitano; Sara Beth Norton; Kevin S Shrestha; Haller J Smith; Charles A Leath; J Michael Straughn Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Carrie L Roth Bettlach; Jessica M Hasak; Katherine B Santosa; Ellen L Larson; Thomas H Tung; Ida K Fox; Amy M Moore; Susan E Mackinnon Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2020-10-07
Authors: Rafa Rahman; Sara Wallam; Bo Zhang; Rahul Sachdev; Emmanuel L McNeely; Khaled M Kebaish; Lee H Riley; David B Cohen; Amit Jain; Sang H Lee; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard L Skolasky; Brian J Neuman Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 2.210