Peter Rose1, Jenni Sakai1, Ruth Argue1, Kevin Froehlich1, Raymond Tang2,3. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. raymond.tang@vch.ca. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Rm 3300, 910 W 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. raymond.tang@vch.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Half of postoperative patients are prescribed an opioid, but a majority do not store or dispose of them properly thus risking diversion. We examined the efficacy of an opioid educational pamphlet addressing opioid weaning, storage, and disposal. We hypothesized that the pamphlet would increase the rate of proper opioid disposal, storage, and weaning. METHODS: This prospective before and after study was conducted at UBC Hospital in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty patients. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, with no addiction history and consuming ≤ 30 mg of morphine equivalents daily were enrolled in the study. Two groups received similar standard management, except the intervention group additionally received the opioid education pamphlet. Patients were contacted four weeks postoperatively to complete a survey. The primary endpoint was to evaluate proper opioid disposal rates. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate opioid storage and weaning rates. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled and 172 (76%) completed the survey. Among patients who had discontinued opioids, rates of proper disposal increased from 2/42 (5%) to 12/45 (27%) in those receiving the pamphlet (difference in proportions, 22%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5 to 38; P = 0.005). Secure opioid storage did not improve in those receiving the opioid pamphlet [before, 18/86 (21%) vs after, 20/86 (23%); difference in proportions, 3%; 95% CI, -11 to 15; P = 0.713]. The proportion of patients weaned from opioids was unchanged by the pamphlet [before, 42/86 (49%) vs after, 45/86 (52%); P = 0.735]. CONCLUSION: The introduction of an education pamphlet significantly improved self-reported proper opioid disposal rates in postoperative patients.
PURPOSE: Half of postoperative patients are prescribed an opioid, but a majority do not store or dispose of them properly thus risking diversion. We examined the efficacy of an opioid educational pamphlet addressing opioid weaning, storage, and disposal. We hypothesized that the pamphlet would increase the rate of proper opioid disposal, storage, and weaning. METHODS: This prospective before and after study was conducted at UBC Hospital in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty patients. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, with no addiction history and consuming ≤ 30 mg of morphine equivalents daily were enrolled in the study. Two groups received similar standard management, except the intervention group additionally received the opioid education pamphlet. Patients were contacted four weeks postoperatively to complete a survey. The primary endpoint was to evaluate proper opioid disposal rates. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate opioid storage and weaning rates. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled and 172 (76%) completed the survey. Among patients who had discontinued opioids, rates of proper disposal increased from 2/42 (5%) to 12/45 (27%) in those receiving the pamphlet (difference in proportions, 22%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5 to 38; P = 0.005). Secure opioid storage did not improve in those receiving the opioid pamphlet [before, 18/86 (21%) vs after, 20/86 (23%); difference in proportions, 3%; 95% CI, -11 to 15; P = 0.713]. The proportion of patients weaned from opioids was unchanged by the pamphlet [before, 42/86 (49%) vs after, 45/86 (52%); P = 0.735]. CONCLUSION: The introduction of an education pamphlet significantly improved self-reported proper opioid disposal rates in postoperative patients.
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Frances A Farley; John Grant; Alan R Tait; Carol J Boyd; Sean Esteban McCabe; Monica Weber; Calista M Harbagh; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jessica M Hasak; Carrie L Roth Bettlach; Katherine B Santosa; Ellen L Larson; Jean Stroud; Susan E Mackinnon Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Anne P Ehlers; Kevin M Sullivan; Kathryn M Stadeli; John I Monu; Judy Y Chen-Meekin; Saurabh Khandelwal Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Rafa Rahman; Sara Wallam; Bo Zhang; Rahul Sachdev; Emmanuel L McNeely; Khaled M Kebaish; Lee H Riley; David B Cohen; Amit Jain; Sang H Lee; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard L Skolasky; Brian J Neuman Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 2.210