Importance: There is growing evidence that opioids are overprescribed following surgery. Improving prescribing requires understanding factors associated with opioid consumption. Objective: To describe opioid prescribing and consumption for a variety of surgical procedures and determine factors associated with opioid consumption after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, population-based analysis of the quantity of opioids prescribed and patient-reported opioid consumption across 33 health systems in Michigan, using a sample of adults 18 years and older undergoing surgery. Patients were included if they were prescribed an opioid after surgery. Surgical procedures took place between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2017, and were included if they were performed in at least 25 patients. Exposures: Opioid prescription size in the initial postoperative prescription. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate risk-adjusted opioid consumption with robust standard errors. Results: In this study, 2392 patients (mean age, 55 years; 1353 women [57%]) underwent 1 of 12 surgical procedures. Overall, the quantity of opioid prescribed was significantly higher than patient-reported opioid consumption (median, 30 pills; IQR, 27-45 pills of hydrocodone/acetaminophen, 5/325 mg, vs 9 pills; IQR, 1-25 pills; P < .001). The quantity of opioid prescribed had the strongest association with patient-reported opioid consumption, with patients using 0.53 more pills (95% CI, 0.40-0.65; P < .001) for every additional pill prescribed. Patient-reported pain in the week after surgery was also significantly associated with consumption but not as strongly as prescription size. Compared with patients reporting no pain, patients used a mean (SD) 9 (1) more pills if they reported moderate pain and 16 (2) more pills if they reported severe pain (P < .001). Other significant risk factors included history of tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, age, procedure type, and inpatient surgery status. After adjusting for these risk factors, patients in the lowest quintile of opioid prescribing had significantly lower mean (SD) opioid consumption compared with those in the highest quintile (5 [2] pills vs 37 [3] pills; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The quantity of opioid prescribed is associated with higher patient-reported opioid consumption. Using patient-reported opioid consumption to develop better prescribing practices is an important step in combating the opioid epidemic.
Importance: There is growing evidence that opioids are overprescribed following surgery. Improving prescribing requires understanding factors associated with opioid consumption. Objective: To describe opioid prescribing and consumption for a variety of surgical procedures and determine factors associated with opioid consumption after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, population-based analysis of the quantity of opioids prescribed and patient-reported opioid consumption across 33 health systems in Michigan, using a sample of adults 18 years and older undergoing surgery. Patients were included if they were prescribed an opioid after surgery. Surgical procedures took place between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2017, and were included if they were performed in at least 25 patients. Exposures: Opioid prescription size in the initial postoperative prescription. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate risk-adjusted opioid consumption with robust standard errors. Results: In this study, 2392 patients (mean age, 55 years; 1353 women [57%]) underwent 1 of 12 surgical procedures. Overall, the quantity of opioid prescribed was significantly higher than patient-reported opioid consumption (median, 30 pills; IQR, 27-45 pills of hydrocodone/acetaminophen, 5/325 mg, vs 9 pills; IQR, 1-25 pills; P < .001). The quantity of opioid prescribed had the strongest association with patient-reported opioid consumption, with patients using 0.53 more pills (95% CI, 0.40-0.65; P < .001) for every additional pill prescribed. Patient-reported pain in the week after surgery was also significantly associated with consumption but not as strongly as prescription size. Compared with patients reporting no pain, patients used a mean (SD) 9 (1) more pills if they reported moderate pain and 16 (2) more pills if they reported severe pain (P < .001). Other significant risk factors included history of tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, age, procedure type, and inpatient surgery status. After adjusting for these risk factors, patients in the lowest quintile of opioid prescribing had significantly lower mean (SD) opioid consumption compared with those in the highest quintile (5 [2] pills vs 37 [3] pills; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The quantity of opioid prescribed is associated with higher patient-reported opioid consumption. Using patient-reported opioid consumption to develop better prescribing practices is an important step in combating the opioid epidemic.
Authors: Brian T Bateman; Naida M Cole; Ayumi Maeda; Sara M Burns; Timothy T Houle; Krista F Huybrechts; Caitlin R Clancy; Stephanie B Hopp; Jeffrey L Ecker; Holly Ende; Kasey Grewe; Beatriz Raposo Corradini; Robert E Schoenfeld; Keerthana Sankar; Lori J Day; Lynnette Harris; Jessica L Booth; Pamela Flood; Melissa E Bauer; Lawrence C Tsen; Ruth Landau; Lisa R Leffert Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Sheyan J Armaghani; Dennis S Lee; Jesse E Bible; Kristin R Archer; David N Shau; Harrison Kay; Chi Zhang; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Paul E Hilliard; Jennifer Waljee; Stephanie Moser; Lynn Metz; Michael Mathis; Jenna Goesling; David Cron; Daniel J Clauw; Michael Englesbe; Goncalo Abecasis; Chad M Brummett Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Karsten Bartels; Lena M Mayes; Colleen Dingmann; Kenneth J Bullard; Christian J Hopfer; Ingrid A Binswanger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander A Brescia; Jennifer F Waljee; Hsou Mei Hu; Michael J Englesbe; Chad M Brummett; Pooja A Lagisetty; Kiran H Lagisetty Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Adam C Adler; Ammar N Yamani; Caitlin D Sutton; Danielle M Guffey; Arvind Chandrakantan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Joceline V Vu; Ryan A Howard; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee; Michael J Englesbe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Katherine B Santosa; Yen-Ling Lai; Chad M Brummett; Jeremie D Oliver; Hsou-Mei Hu; Michael J Englesbe; Emilie M Blair; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 5.128