Literature DB >> 33346735

Future Mobile Device Usage, Requirements, and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey.

Oliver Maassen1,2, Sebastian Fritsch1,2, Julia Gantner2,3, Saskia Deffge1,2, Julian Kunze1,2, Gernot Marx1,2, Johannes Bickenbach1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of mobile devices in hospital care constantly increases. However, smartphones and tablets have not yet widely become official working equipment in medical care. Meanwhile, the parallel use of private and official devices in hospitals is common. Medical staff use smartphones and tablets in a growing number of ways. This mixture of devices and how they can be used is a challenge to persons in charge of defining strategies and rules for the usage of mobile devices in hospital care.
OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we aimed to examine the status quo of physicians' mobile device usage and concrete requirements and their future expectations of how mobile devices can be used.
METHODS: We performed a web-based survey among physicians in 8 German university hospitals from June to October 2019. The online survey was forwarded by hospital management personnel to physicians from all departments involved in patient care at the local sites.
RESULTS: A total of 303 physicians from almost all medical fields and work experience levels completed the web-based survey. The majority regarded a tablet (211/303, 69.6%) and a smartphone (177/303, 58.4%) as the ideal devices for their operational area. In practice, physicians are still predominantly using desktop computers during their worktime (mean percentage of worktime spent on a desktop computer: 56.8%; smartphone: 12.8%; tablet: 3.6%). Today, physicians use mobile devices for basic tasks such as oral (171/303, 56.4%) and written (118/303, 38.9%) communication and to look up dosages, diagnoses, and guidelines (194/303, 64.0%). Respondents are also willing to use mobile devices for more advanced applications such as an early warning system (224/303, 73.9%) and mobile electronic health records (211/303, 69.6%). We found a significant association between the technical affinity and the preference of device in medical care (χs2=53.84, P<.001) showing that with increasing self-reported technical affinity, the preference for smartphones and tablets increases compared to desktop computers.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians in German university hospitals have a high technical affinity and positive attitude toward the widespread implementation of mobile devices in clinical care. They are willing to use official mobile devices in clinical practice for basic and advanced mobile health uses. Thus, the reason for the low usage is not a lack of willingness of the potential users. Challenges that hinder the wider adoption of mobile devices might be regulatory, financial and organizational issues, and missing interoperability standards of clinical information systems, but also a shortage of areas of application in which workflows are adapted for (small) mobile devices. ©Oliver Maassen, Sebastian Fritsch, Julia Gantner, Saskia Deffge, Julian Kunze, Gernot Marx, Johannes Bickenbach. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apps; device usage; expectations; hospital; mHealth; mobile applications; mobile devices; requirements; smartphones; tablets; working equipment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33346735      PMCID: PMC7781804          DOI: 10.2196/23955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  44 in total

Review 1.  The emerging field of mobile health.

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Evan D Muse; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Evaluation of Secure Messaging Applications for a Health Care System: A Case Study.

Authors:  Xinran Liu; Paul R Sutton; Rory McKenna; Mika N Sinanan; B Jane Fellner; Michael G Leu; Cris Ewell
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  WhatsApp in Clinical Practice: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Maurice Mars; Richard E Scott
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016

4.  Impact of Mobile Device-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool on Guideline Adherence and Mental Workload.

Authors:  Katherine M Richardson; Sarah D Fouquet; Ellen Kerns; Russell J McCulloh
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 5.  Features, outcomes, and challenges in mobile health interventions for patients living with chronic diseases: A review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andreas Triantafyllidis; Haridimos Kondylakis; Konstantinos Votis; Dimitrios Tzovaras; Nicos Maglaveras; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care.

Authors:  Benjamin Schooley; Steven Walczak; Neset Hikmet; Nitin Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 7.  Use of mobile devices in the emergency department: A scoping review.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Elizabeth M Borycki
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Use of a clinical decision support tool for the management of traumatic dental injuries in the primary dentition by novice and expert clinicians.

Authors:  Jessica P Machado; Xuan T Lam; Jung-Wei Chen
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Using mobile devices for inpatient rounding and handoffs: an innovative application developed and rapidly adopted by clinicians in a pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Aude Motulsky; Jenna Wong; Jean-Pierre Cordeau; Jorge Pomalaza; Jeffrey Barkun; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Short-term trajectories of use of a caloric-monitoring mobile phone app among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Glenn Goh; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Rahul Malhotra; Uma Padmanabhan; Sylvaine Barbier; John Carson Allen; Truls Østbye
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Development History and Research Tendency of Medical Informatics: Topic Evolution Analysis.

Authors:  Wenting Han; Xi Han; Sijia Zhou; Qinghua Zhu
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Requirements for a Bespoke Intensive Care Unit Dashboard in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Semistructured Interview Study.

Authors:  Brittany Davidson; Katiuska Mara Ferrer Portillo; Marceli Wac; Chris McWilliams; Christopher Bourdeaux; Ian Craddock
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-04-13

3.  Don't forget the oldies: using IoT to connect the legacy medical equipments.

Authors:  Linghua Yu; Ming Yao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 19.334

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.