Harsha L Rao1,2, Mohammed Riyazuddin1, Srilakshmi Dasari1, Narendra K Puttaiah1,2, Zia S Pradhan2, Robert N Weinreb3, Kaweh Mansouri4,5, Carroll A B Webers6. 1. Narayana Nethralaya, Hulimavu. 2. Narayana Nethralaya, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA. 4. Glaucoma Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Swiss Vision Network, Lausanne, Switzerland. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO. 6. University Eye Clinic Maastricht, University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the relationship between macular optical microangiography (OMAG), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and visual sensitivity measurements of different macular sectors in primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 39 eyes of 26 primary open-angle glaucoma patients underwent optical coherence tomography imaging and 10-2 visual field examination of the macula in the same session. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between OMAG, GCIPL thickness, and visual sensitivity measurements in different macular sectors. Strength of relationship was reported as coefficient of determination (R). RESULTS: R values for the associations between OMAG and GCIPL thickness measurements ranged from 0.37 in the temporal sector to 0.56 in the inferior macular sector. R values for the association between OMAG and visual sensitivity measurements ranged from 0.23 in the superior to 0.53 in the inferior macular sector. R values for the association between GCIPL thickness and visual sensitivity measurements ranged from 0.15 in the superior to 0.62 in the temporal sector. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest associations between OMAG, GCIPL thickness, and visual sensitivity measurements were found in the inferior macular sector. The association of OMAG with GCIPL thickness measurements was as strong as the association between OMAG and visual sensitivity measurements in the inferior macular sector.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the relationship between macular optical microangiography (OMAG), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and visual sensitivity measurements of different macular sectors in primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 39 eyes of 26 primary open-angle glaucomapatients underwent optical coherence tomography imaging and 10-2 visual field examination of the macula in the same session. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between OMAG, GCIPL thickness, and visual sensitivity measurements in different macular sectors. Strength of relationship was reported as coefficient of determination (R). RESULTS: R values for the associations between OMAG and GCIPL thickness measurements ranged from 0.37 in the temporal sector to 0.56 in the inferior macular sector. R values for the association between OMAG and visual sensitivity measurements ranged from 0.23 in the superior to 0.53 in the inferior macular sector. R values for the association between GCIPL thickness and visual sensitivity measurements ranged from 0.15 in the superior to 0.62 in the temporal sector. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest associations between OMAG, GCIPL thickness, and visual sensitivity measurements were found in the inferior macular sector. The association of OMAG with GCIPL thickness measurements was as strong as the association between OMAG and visual sensitivity measurements in the inferior macular sector.
Authors: Jennifer Cano; Mansour Rahimi; Benjamin Y Xu; Grace M Richter; Ou Tan; David Huang; Mahnaz Shahidi Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Zia S Pradhan; Min Hee Suh; Sasan Moghimi; Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Srilakshmi Dasari; Narendra K Puttaiah; Zia S Pradhan; Sasan Moghimi; Kaweh Mansouri; Carroll A B Webers; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-07-25 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Cody Hansen; Karine D Bojikian; Zhongdi Chu; Xiao Zhou; Qinqin Zhang; Raghu C Mudumbai; Murray A Johnstone; Ruikang K Wang; Philip P Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.240