| Literature DB >> 29324636 |
Joy Nyangasi Kirungu1, Yanfeng Deng2, Xiaoyan Cai3, Richard Odongo Magwanga4,5, Zhongli Zhou6, Xingxing Wang7, Yuhong Wang8, Zhenmei Zhang9, Kunbo Wang10, Fang Liu11.
Abstract
The challenge in tetraploid cotton cultivars is the narrow genetic base and therefore, the bottleneck is how to obtain interspecific hybrids and introduce the germplasm directly from wild cotton to elite cultivars. Construction of genetic maps has provided insight into understanding the genome structure, interrelationships between organisms in relation to evolution, and discovery of genes that carry important agronomic traits in plants. In this study, we generated an interspecific hybrid between two wild diploid cottons, Gossypium davidsonii and Gossypium klotzschianum, and genotyped 188 F2:3 populations in order to develop a genetic map. We screened 12,560 SWU Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) primers and obtained 1000 polymorphic markers which accounted for only 8%. A total of 928 polymorphic primers were successfully scored and only 728 were effectively linked across the 13 chromosomes, but with an asymmetrical distribution. The map length was 1480.23 cM, with an average length of 2.182 cM between adjacent markers. A high percentage of the markers on the map developed, and for the physical map of G. raimondii, exhibited highly significant collinearity, with two types of duplication. High level of segregation distortion was observed. A total of 27 key genes were identified with diverse roles in plant hormone signaling, development, and defense reactions. The achievement of developing the F2:3 population and its genetic map constructions may be a landmark in establishing a new tool for the genetic improvement of cultivars from wild plants in cotton. Our map had an increased recombination length compared to other maps developed from other D genome cotton species.Entities:
Keywords: genetic map; null alleles; polymorphic primers; wild cotton spp
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324636 PMCID: PMC5796153 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19010204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Polymorphic rate of screened SWU primers.
| Primer | No. of Markers | No. of Polymorphic Primers | Dominant Markers | Non-Dominant Markers | No. of Linked Markers | Polymorphic Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWU | 12,650 | 1000 | 200 (27.17%) | 528 (72.83%) | 728 | 8.00% |
Figure 1Genetic map constructed using the F2:3 Population derived from the parental lines. The visual presentation was analysed by R software.
Characteristics of the genetic map.
| Chr. | Markers per Chromosome | SD | Average Distance (cM) | Average % SD | Map Size (cM) | Marker Distance Gaps (cM) per Chromosome | Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smallest Gap (cM) | Largest Gap in (cM) | <5 cM | 5–10 cM | 10–20 cM | >20 cM | |||||||
| 89 | 3 | 1.304 | 3.371 | 116.045 | 0.005 | 8.756 | 83 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.9326 | |
| 44 | 35 | 1.884 | 76.087 | 82.908 | 0.044 | 18.328 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.8864 | |
| 45 | 8 | 2.59 | 17.778 | 116.528 | 0.14 | 10.009 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.8667 | |
| 56 | 2 | 1.997 | 3.571 | 111.846 | 0.008 | 17.538 | 53 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.9464 | |
| 49 | 17 | 2.361 | 34.694 | 115.671 | 0.056 | 8.493 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.9184 | |
| 58 | 5 | 2.001 | 8.621 | 116.045 | 0.002 | 14.926 | 52 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.8966 | |
| 86 | 35 | 1.446 | 40.698 | 124.358 | 0.016 | 7.988 | 81 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.9419 | |
| 49 | 25 | 2.492 | 51.02 | 122.13 | 0.054 | 14.099 | 45 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.9184 | |
| 69 | 12 | 1.697 | 16.216 | 117.06 | 0.046 | 11.167 | 63 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.9130 | |
| 34 | 2 | 2.998 | 5.882 | 101.93 | 0.117 | 12.472 | 25 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0.7353 | |
| 63 | 5 | 1.806 | 7.937 | 113.801 | 0.042 | 36.597 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.9524 | |
| 49 | 6 | 2.301 | 12.245 | 112.739 | 0.065 | 9.588 | 43 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.8776 | |
| 37 | 4 | 3.491 | 10.526 | 129.164 | 0.137 | 25.3 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0.7568 | |
| 728 | 159 | 2.182 | 22.20 | 1480.23 | 0.0563 | 15.020 | 656 | 45 | 11 | 2 | 0.9011 | |
Chr chromosome; SD segregation distortion; cM centiMorgan; % percentage;
Segregation distortion in the F2:3 interspecific populations derived from two wild cottons of D genome.
| Chromosome | Chi Square (χ2) Values | Loci Number | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heterozygote’s | Totals | ||||||||||
| Chr01 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Chr02 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 34 | 1 | 35 |
| Chr03 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Chr04 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Chr05 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| Chr06 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Chr07 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 35 |
| Chr08 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 25 |
| Chr09 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Chr10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Chr11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Chr12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Chr13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Total | 32 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 92 | 12 | 74 | 73 | 159 |
p < 0.05; p < 0.01; p < 0.005; p < 0.001; p < 0.0005; p < 0.0001; p < 0.00005 significant levels at 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, 0.001, 0.0005, 0.00001, and 0.00005 respectively.
Figure 2Linkage groups with the highest segregation distortion. Segregation distortion region (SDR); chromosome 2 has three regions, chromosome 5 has one region, chromosome 7 has four regions, and chromosome 8 has two regions. The marker positions are in centiMorgans (cM).
Figure 3Collinearity between the genetic map and the physical map of diploid cotton.
Figure 4A section of physical map (P.MAP) with intra-chromosomal duplication. The red boxes indicate the duplicated markers. The marker positions are in base pairs (Bp).
Figure 5Collinearity between the genetic map and the physical map of the Dt sub-genome of G. hirsutum. The different line colors represent the various syntenic block regions between the chromosomes.
Figure 6Gene ontology (GO) annotation results of the mined genes from the SSR derived genetic map of the D genome. GO analysis of 2063 protein sequences predicted their involvement in biological processes (BP), molecular functions (MF), and cellular components (CC).
Figure 7Physical map showing the exact locations of the identified key genes. The gene positions are in base pairs (bp). “SWU” are the SSR markers while the “Gorai” are the gene identities. The blue boxes indicate the key genes.
Figure 8RNA sequence data analysis of 100 highly up regulated genes as per the RNA sequence. The heatmap was generated by log10 of the expression values. Colour coding indicates expression as illustrated in the key. Y-axis is the relative expression (2−ΔΔ).