Literature DB >> 15095058

Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants.

P K Gupta1, S Rustgi.   

Abstract

In recent years, molecular marker technology in higher plants has witnessed a shift from the so-called random DNA markers (RDMs), developed in the past arbitrarily from genomic DNA and cDNA, to the molecular markers representing the transcriptome and the other coding sequences. These markers have been described as gene targeted markers (GTMs). Another specific class of markers includes the so-called functional markers (FMs), which are supposed to have a cause and effect relationship with the traits of interest. In this review, we first describe the development of these markers representing the transcriptome or genes per se; we then discuss the uses of these markers in some detail and finally add a note on the future directions of research and the implications of the wider application of these markers in crop improvement programmes. Using suitable examples, we describe markers of different classes derived from cDNA clones, expressed sequence tags (ESTs), gene sequences and the unique (coding) sequences obtained through methyl filtration or genome normalization (high C(0) t fraction) from gDNA libraries. While we briefly describe RFLPs, SSRs, AFLPs and SNPs developed from the transcriptome (cDNA clones and EST databases), we have discussed in more detail some of the novel markers developed from the transcriptome and specific genes. These novel markers include expressed sequence tag polymorphisms (ESTPs), conserved orthologue set (COS) markers, amplified consensus genetic markers (ACGMs), gene specific tags (GSTs), resistance gene analogues (RGAs) and exon-retrotransposon amplification polymorphism (ERAP). Uses of these markers have been discussed in some detail under the following headings: development of transcript and functional maps, estimations of genetic diversity, marker-assisted selection (MAS), candidate-gene (CG) approach and map-based cloning, genetical genomics and identification of eQTLs, study of genome organization and taxonomic and phylogenetic studies. At the end, we also append a list of websites relevant to further studies on the transcriptome. For want of space, considerable information including voluminous data in the form of 12 tables, and a long list of references cited in these tables, has been placed on the Internet as electronic supplementary material (ESM), which the readers may find useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15095058     DOI: 10.1007/s10142-004-0107-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics        ISSN: 1438-793X            Impact factor:   3.410


  184 in total

Review 1.  Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes:m microcolinearity and its many exceptions.

Authors:  J L Bennetzen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Polymorphism of PCR-based markers targeting exons, introns, promoter regions, and SSRs in maize and introns and repeat sequences in oat.

Authors:  J B Holland; S J Helland; N Sharopova; D C Rhyne
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  Expressed sequence tags: alternative or complement to whole genome sequences?

Authors:  Stephen Rudd
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Combining gene expression and molecular marker information for mapping complex trait genes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Miguel Pérez-Enciso; Miguel A Toro; Michel Tenenhaus; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Assessment of cytochrome P450 sequences offers a useful tool for determining genetic diversity in higher plant species.

Authors:  S Yamanaka; E Suzuki; M Tanaka; Y Takeda; J A Watanabe; K N Watanabe
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Discrimination of homoeologous gene expression in hexaploid wheat by SNP analysis of contigs grouped from a large number of expressed sequence tags.

Authors:  K Mochida; Y Yamazaki; Y Ogihara
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 7.  Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants.

Authors:  Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Jeffry M Thornsberry; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 26.379

8.  A high-density cytogenetic map of the Aegilops tauschii genome incorporating retrotransposons and defense-related genes: insights into cereal chromosome structure and function.

Authors:  Elena Boyko; Ruslan Kalendar; Victor Korzun; John Fellers; Abraham Korol; Alan H Schulman; Bikram S Gill
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  The Ph2 pairing homoeologous locus of wheat (Triticum aestivum): identification of candidate meiotic genes using a comparative genetics approach.

Authors:  Tim Sutton; Ryan Whitford; Ute Baumann; Chongmei Dong; Jason A Able; Peter Langridge
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  QTL and candidate genes phytoene synthase and zeta-carotene desaturase associated with the accumulation of carotenoids in maize.

Authors:  J C Wong; R J Lambert; E T Wurtzel; T R Rocheford
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  56 in total

1.  A novel blast resistance gene, Pi54rh cloned from wild species of rice, Oryza rhizomatis confers broad spectrum resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae.

Authors:  Alok Das; D Soubam; P K Singh; S Thakur; N K Singh; T R Sharma
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.410

Review 2.  Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: present status and future prospects.

Authors:  Pushpendra K Gupta; Sachin Rustgi; Pawan L Kulwal
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Characterization of EST-SSR markers in durum wheat EST library and functional analysis of SSR-containing EST fragments.

Authors:  Ali Akbar Asadi; Sajad Rashidi Monfared
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Development and functional assessment of EST-derived 2RL-specific markers for 2BS.2RL translocations.

Authors:  Tong Geon Lee; Min Jeong Hong; Jerry W Johnson; Daniel E Bland; Dae Yeon Kim; Yong Weon Seo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Identification and mapping of SNPs from ESTs in sunflower.

Authors:  Z Lai; K Livingstone; Y Zou; S A Church; S J Knapp; J Andrews; L H Rieseberg
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Functional markers in wheat: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Yanan Liu; Zhonghu He; Rudi Appels; Xianchun Xia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Conserved DNA-derived polymorphism, new markers for genetic diversity analysis of Tunisian Pistacia vera L.

Authors:  Meriem Aouadi; Karim Guenni; Donia Abdallah; Marwa Louati; Khaled Chatti; Ghada Baraket; Amel Salhi Hannachi
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2019-08-10

8.  Exploitation of pepper EST-SSRs and an SSR-based linkage map.

Authors:  Gibum Yi; Je Min Lee; Sanghyeob Lee; Doil Choi; Byung-Dong Kim
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Comparative assessment of ISSR, DAMD and SCoT markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of landrace chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes collected from north-west of Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Pakseresht; Reza Talebi; Ezzat Karami
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2013-10

10.  Genomics in cereals: from genome-wide conserved orthologous set (COS) sequences to candidate genes for trait dissection.

Authors:  Umar Masood Quraishi; Michael Abrouk; Stéphanie Bolot; Caroline Pont; Mickael Throude; Nicolas Guilhot; Carole Confolent; Fernanda Bortolini; Sébastien Praud; Alain Murigneux; Gilles Charmet; Jerome Salse
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.