Literature DB >> 29322068

Measuring temporal stability of positron emission tomography standardized uptake value bias using long-lived sources in a multicenter network.

Darrin Byrd1, Rebecca Christopfel1, Grae Arabasz2, Ciprian Catana2, Joel Karp3, Martin A Lodge4, Charles Laymon5, Eduardo G Moros6, Mikalai Budzevich6, Sadek Nehmeh7, Joshua Scheuermann3, John Sunderland8, Jun Zhang9, Paul Kinahan1.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a quantitative imaging modality, but the computation of standardized uptake values (SUVs) requires several instruments to be correctly calibrated. Variability in the calibration process may lead to unreliable quantitation. Sealed source kits containing traceable amounts of [Formula: see text] were used to measure signal stability for 19 PET scanners at nine hospitals in the National Cancer Institute's Quantitative Imaging Network. Repeated measurements of the sources were performed on PET scanners and in dose calibrators. The measured scanner and dose calibrator signal biases were used to compute the bias in SUVs at multiple time points for each site over a 14-month period. Estimation of absolute SUV accuracy was confounded by bias from the solid phantoms' physical properties. On average, the intrascanner coefficient of variation for SUV measurements was 3.5%. Over the entire length of the study, single-scanner SUV values varied over a range of 11%. Dose calibrator bias was not correlated with scanner bias. Calibration factors from the image metadata were nearly as variable as scanner signal, and were correlated with signal for many scanners. SUVs often showed low intrascanner variability between successive measurements but were also prone to shifts in apparent bias, possibly in part due to scanner recalibrations that are part of regular scanner quality control. Biases of key factors in the computation of SUVs were not correlated and their temporal variations did not cancel out of the computation. Long-lived sources and image metadata may provide a check on the recalibration process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calibration; clinical trials; quantitative positron emission tomography imaging; standardized uptake value

Year:  2018        PMID: 29322068      PMCID: PMC5753626          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  28 in total

1.  Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Mehmet Kocak; Harold Thurston; Tina Young Poussaint
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.

Authors:  R K Doot; J S Scheuermann; P E Christian; J S Karp; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Development of a calibration methodology for large-volume, solid ⁶⁸Ge phantoms for traceable measurements in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  B E Zimmerman; L Pibida; L E King; D E Bergeron; J T Cessna; M M Mille
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a multicenter phase I study of patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Linda M Velasquez; Ronald Boellaard; Georgia Kollia; Wendy Hayes; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Susan M Galbraith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Impact of Recent Change in the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard for 18F on the Relative Response of 68Ge-Based Mock Syringe Dose Calibrator Standards.

Authors:  Brian E Zimmerman; Denis E Bergeron; Jeffrey T Cessna
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael M Graham; Richard L Wahl; John M Hoffman; Jeffrey T Yap; John J Sunderland; Ronald Boellaard; Eric S Perlman; Paul E Kinahan; Paul E Christian; Otto S Hoekstra; Gary S Dorfman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Biases in Multicenter Longitudinal PET Standardized Uptake Value Measurements.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Larry A Pierce; Darrin Byrd; Brian Elston; Keith C Allberg; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 9.  Routine quality control of clinical nuclear medicine instrumentation: a brief review.

Authors:  Pat Zanzonico
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prospective Study of Serial 18F-FDG PET and 18F-Fluoride PET to Predict Time to Skeletal-Related Events, Time to Progression, and Survival in Patients with Bone-Dominant Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; Janet O'Sullivan; Qian Vicky Wu; Alena Novakova-Jiresova; Isaac Jenkins; Jean H Lee; Andrew Shields; Susan Montgomery; Hannah M Linden; Julie Gralow; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Mark Muzi; Paul Kinahan; David Mankoff; Jennifer M Specht
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Measurement of PET Quantitative Bias In Vivo.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Wojciech Lesniak; Michael A Gorin; Kenneth J Pienta; Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Simultaneous Estimation of Bias and Resolution in PET Images With a Long-Lived "Pocket" Phantom System.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Darrin W Byrd; Brian Helba; Kristen A Wangerin; Xiaoxiao Liu; Joshua R Levy; Keith C Allberg; Karthik Krishnan; Ricardo S Avila
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2018-03

4.  Bias in PET Images of Solid Phantoms Due to CT-Based Attenuation Correction.

Authors:  Darrin W Byrd; John J Sunderland; Tzu-Cheng Lee; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.