Literature DB >> 23616206

Machine learning for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Subramani Mani1, Yukun Chen, Xia Li, Lori Arlinghaus, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Vandana Abramson, Sandeep R Bhave, Mia A Levy, Hua Xu, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To employ machine learning methods to predict the eventual therapeutic response of breast cancer patients after a single cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI data were acquired on 28 patients before and after one cycle of NAC. A total of 118 semiquantitative and quantitative parameters were derived from these data and combined with 11 clinical variables. We used Bayesian logistic regression in combination with feature selection using a machine learning framework for predictive model building.
RESULTS: The best predictive models using feature selection obtained an area under the curve of 0.86 and an accuracy of 0.86, with a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.82. DISCUSSION: With the numerous options for NAC available, development of a method to predict response early in the course of therapy is needed. Unfortunately, by the time most patients are found not to be responding, their disease may no longer be surgically resectable, and this situation could be avoided by the development of techniques to assess response earlier in the treatment regimen. The method outlined here is one possible solution to this important clinical problem.
CONCLUSIONS: Predictive modeling approaches based on machine learning using readily available clinical and quantitative MRI data show promise in distinguishing breast cancer responders from non-responders after the first cycle of NAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; breast cancer; diffusion MRI; machine learning; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; predictive modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616206      PMCID: PMC3721158          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  17 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Development and validation of nomograms for predicting residual tumor size and the probability of successful conservative surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Roman Rouzier; Lajos Pusztai; Jean-Remi Garbay; Suzette Delaloge; Kelly K Hunt; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Donald Berry; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications.

Authors:  Liyang Wei; Yongyi Yang; Robert M Nishikawa; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods.

Authors:  Dursun Delen; Glenn Walker; Amit Kadam
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A combined neural network and decision trees model for prognosis of breast cancer relapse.

Authors:  José M Jerez-Aragonés; José A Gómez-Ruiz; Gonzalo Ramos-Jiménez; José Muñoz-Pérez; Emilio Alba-Conejo
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Integration of early physiological responses predicts later illness severity in preterm infants.

Authors:  Suchi Saria; Anand K Rajani; Jeffrey Gould; Daphne Koller; Anna A Penn
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Simultaneous measurement of arterial input function and tumor pharmacokinetics in mice by dynamic contrast enhanced imaging: effects of transcytolemmal water exchange.

Authors:  Rong Zhou; Stephen Pickup; Thomas E Yankeelov; Charles S Springer; Jerry D Glickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Xin Li; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  MRI-based radiomics nomogram may predict the response to induction chemotherapy and survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Lina Zhao; Jie Gong; Yibin Xi; Man Xu; Chen Li; Xiaowei Kang; Yutian Yin; Wei Qin; Hong Yin; Mei Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Combining multiparametric MRI with receptor information to optimize prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hakmook Kang; Allison Hainline; Lori R Arlinghaus; Stephanie Elderidge; Xia Li; Vandana G Abramson; Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Brian Bingham; Kareem Fakhoury; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Deformable registration for quantifying longitudinal tumor changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Sarah Englander; Xiao Da; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Mark Rosen; Angela DeMichele; Christos Davatzikos; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Impact of Machine Learning With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amirhessam Tahmassebi; Georg J Wengert; Thomas H Helbich; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Sousan Alaei; Rupert Bartsch; Peter Dubsky; Pascal Baltzer; Paola Clauser; Panagiotis Kapetas; Elizabeth A Morris; Anke Meyer-Baese; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in monitoring the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen Gao; Ning Guo; Ting Dong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Predicting Outcome of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Potential Value of Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Hendrikus J A van Os; Lucas A Ramos; Adam Hilbert; Matthijs van Leeuwen; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Nyika D Kruyt; Diederik W J Dippel; Ewout W Steyerberg; Irene C van der Schaaf; Hester F Lingsma; Wouter J Schonewille; Charles B L M Majoie; Silvia D Olabarriaga; Koos H Zwinderman; Esmee Venema; Henk A Marquering; Marieke J H Wermer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Novel Insights on Establishing Machine Learning-Based Stroke Prediction Models Among Hypertensive Adults.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Tianyu Cao; Liangziqian Chen; Junpei Li; Ziheng Tan; Benjamin Xu; Richard Xu; Yun Song; Ziyi Zhou; Zhuo Wang; Yaping Wei; Yan Zhang; Jianping Li; Yong Huo; Xianhui Qin; Yanqing Wu; Xiaobin Wang; Hong Wang; Xiaoshu Cheng; Xiping Xu; Lishun Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-06

8.  Machine Learning Models and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Carmen Herrero Vicent; Xavier Tudela; Paula Moreno Ruiz; Víctor Pedralva; Ana Jiménez Pastor; Daniel Ahicart; Silvia Rubio Novella; Isabel Meneu; Ángela Montes Albuixech; Miguel Ángel Santamaria; María Fonfria; Almudena Fuster-Matanzo; Santiago Olmos Antón; Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Machine learning classification of texture features of MRI breast tumor and peri-tumor of combined pre- and early treatment predicts pathologic complete response.

Authors:  Lal Hussain; Pauline Huang; Tony Nguyen; Kashif J Lone; Amjad Ali; Muhammad Salman Khan; Haifang Li; Doug Young Suh; Tim Q Duong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  Machine learning with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Roberto Lo Gullo; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Elizabeth A Morris; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.380

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.