Literature DB >> 10029222

Phases of alcohol problem prevention research.

H Holder1, B Flay, J Howard, G Boyd, R Voas, M Grossman.   

Abstract

We build on precedents from other health research to present a phases model of research for alcohol problem prevention that accommodates the special characteristics of this research. We propose a five-level model, in which research moves along a series of relevant continua: from basic to more and more applied research; from descriptive hypothesis-generating pilot studies to full-fledged, methodologically sophisticated, hypothesis-testing studies; from smaller to larger samples for testing; from greater to lesser control of experimental conditions; from more artificial "laboratory" environments to real-world geographically defined communities; from testing the effects of single prevention strategies to more complex studies of multiple strategies integrated into intervention systems; and from research-driven outcome studies to "demonstration" projects that evaluate the capacity of various types of communities to implement prevention programs based on prior evaluations. The five phases of research are: (1) foundational research to define and determine the prevalence of specific alcohol-involved problems, establish causal factors and processes that yield the specific problems or increase the risk of a problem, and provide the foundations for the development of effective prevention interventions; (2) developmental (preliminary effectiveness) studies to develop and test the likely effectiveness, safety, and costs of new interventions or to assess the effectiveness, safety, and costs of an existing intervention; (3) efficacy studies to determine the effects, safety, and costs of an intervention under optimal conditions of implementation (or availability or enforcement) and acceptance (or adoption at the community, organizational, or group level; or participation, compliance, or adherence at the individual level); (4) effectiveness studies of the real-world effectiveness of preventive interventions with purposeful or natural variation in implementation and acceptance; and (5) demonstration studies of the effects of interventions when widely disseminated. The proposed phases model for alcohol problem prevention research presented herein differs in significant ways from the models established by other National Institutes of Health agencies. Greater emphasis is placed on natural experiments, on methods development along the whole research continuum, on collapsing or combining research phases when appropriate, on recognizing the critical importance of behavioral parameters early as well as late in the research sequence, and on extending the research continuum to embrace diffusion and dissemination (i.e., technology transfer) studies. We also include examples of phased research in existing alcohol studies and a discussion of relevant issues, including cost, special populations, methods, and dissemination. If systematically followed, this model has the potential to contribute to wider testing and dissemination of prevention interventions of known effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10029222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  18 in total

1.  Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination.

Authors:  Brian R Flay; Anthony Biglan; Robert F Boruch; Felipe González Castro; Denise Gottfredson; Sheppard Kellam; Eve K Mościcki; Steven Schinke; Jeffrey C Valentine; Peter Ji
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-09

2.  Estimating intervention effectiveness: synthetic projection of field evaluation results.

Authors:  James H Derzon; Elizabeth Sale; J Fred Springer; Paul Brounstein
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2005-07

3.  Moving from efficacy to effectiveness trials in prevention research.

Authors:  Erica Marchand; Eric Stice; Paul Rohde; Carolyn Black Becker
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2010-11-02

4.  A community prevention intervention to reduce youth from inhaling and ingesting harmful legal products.

Authors:  Knowlton Johnson; Harold Holder; Kristen Ogilvie; David Collins; Diane Ogilvie; Brian Saylor; Matthew Courser; Brenda Miller; Roland Moore; Bob Saltz
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2007

5.  A framework for understanding "evidence" in prevention research and programs.

Authors:  Sheppard G Kellam; Doris J Langevin
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2003-09

6.  Replication of a Controlled Community Prevention Trial: Results From a Local Implementation of Science-Based Intervention to Reduce Impaired Driving.

Authors:  Michael D George; Harold D Holder; Paul N McKenzie; Heather R Mueller; Donna C Herchek; Barry S Faile
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2018-02

7.  Cohabitation, gender, and alcohol consumption in 19 countries: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Qing Li; Richard Wilsnack; Sharon Wilsnack; Arlinda Kristjanson
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.164

8.  Past 15-year trends in lifetime cocaine use among US high school students.

Authors:  Kristin E Schneider; Noa Krawczyk; Ziming Xuan; Renee M Johnson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Communication between researchers and practitioners: findings from a qualitative evaluation of a large-scale college intervention.

Authors:  Peter Nygaard; Robert F Saltz
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.164

10.  Race/Ethnicity Differences in Trends of Marijuana, Cigarette, and Alcohol Use Among 8th, 10th, and 12th Graders in Washington State, 2004-2016.

Authors:  Renee M Johnson; Charles B Fleming; Christopher Cambron; Lorraine T Dean; Sherri-Chanelle Brighthaupt; Katarina Guttmannova
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.