Literature DB >> 29318016

Transoral incisionless fundoplication for Jehovah's Witnesses: A case report discussing safety and durability.

Medhat Y Fanous1, David Lorenson1, Sarah Williams1, Anja K Jaehne1.   

Abstract

Jehovah's Witness patients pose a unique surgical challenge due to their refusal of transfusion of whole blood or major blood products. One of the surgical strategies is to offer the least invasive approach with the least likelihood of losing blood. In the context of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, endoluminal approaches such as transoral incisionless fundoplication represent an appropriate approach for Jehovah's Witness patients. This patient is a devout Jehovah's Witness who was troubled with gastroesophageal reflux disease for many years which was refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy. Her standard preoperative workup showed that she was a candidate for transoral incisionless fundoplication. Surgery was performed by a transoral incisionless fundoplication certified surgeon and this patient was his second case. Patient had no immediate or long-term complications. She was successfully weaned off proton pump inhibitors. Transoral incisionless fundoplication is an appropriate option for Jehovah's Witness patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. This case report shows that the procedure is safe and durable, even in the early stage of the physician's learning curve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Jehovah’s Witness; Transoral incisionless fundoplication; gastroesophageal reflux disease; minimal invasive surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29318016      PMCID: PMC5753896          DOI: 10.1177/2050313X17748863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-313X


Introduction

The surgical management of Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) can pose significant challenges. The main challenge stems from the refusal to receive blood and blood products for religious reasons regardless of medical consequences.[1] This refusal consequently impacts emergent or elective decision making in concern to medical interventions. In elective surgery, there is time for planning, risk stratification, and implementing appropriate perioperative strategies.[2,3] With these considerations, minimally invasive procedures, which have been shown to be safe and effective, should be preferred over traditional surgical procedures. In this publication, we will discuss a JW patient with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), who had exhausted possible medical intervention consisting of medical therapy and lifestyle modifications.

Case description

The patient is a 69-year-old female with the past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, and with interstitial cystitis. A written informed consent for publication of this case has been obtained. She reported GERD symptoms for the past 16 years. Her GERD symptoms included heartburn, oral acid taste, regurgitation and epigastric discomfort. Medical treatment using proton pump inhibitors (PPI) only provided partial relief of these symptoms. The patient became PPI dependent and was unwilling to stop PPI even for a wireless pH study. She also had undergone four esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) for diagnostic purposes only and was not offered any intervention apart from recommending a different PPI. She increased frequency of PPI use to twice daily. The patient was referred for evaluation for transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF). Her examination was remarkable for the scars from her previous surgeries (laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hysterectomy). Her body mass index was 33.9. She completed the GERD-related quality of life questionnaires. The score of the GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL)[4] questionnaire was 20. Reflux symptoms index (RSI) questionnaire score was 11. GERD symptom score (GERSS) questionnaire score was 5. Her preoperative evaluation consisted of barium esophagram which showed good esophageal motility and a small hiatal hernia. EGD showed 2 cm sliding hiatal hernia with Hill deformity of II. Patient had abnormal gastroesophageal junction with Los Angeles class A esophagitis. Patient declined to stop PPI for esophageal pH testing due to severe GERD symptoms. We performed 48 h wireless pH probe study yielding a DeMeester score of 1.7. Preoperative esophageal manometry showed normal peristalsis and normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation. We discussed the option of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication; however, the patient was interested only in natural orifice anti-reflux procedures. She was found to be a good candidate for TIF. She was the second patient to undergo this procedure by a TIF certified experienced endoscopic surgeon. Informed consent was obtained after we discussed the nature of the procedure and the surgeon’s experience. The patient clearly indicated that she did not want to receive blood or blood products regardless of medical consequences. She underwent the standardized TIF procedure using EsophyX HD device (EndoGastric Solutions, Redmond, WA, United States). The endoscopic retroflexed views of the native gastroesophageal valve (GEV) and the reconstructed GEV after TIF are illustrated in Figure 1. We performed an approximately 270° fundoplication with a GEV length of 3 cm. Her postoperative course was unremarkable and she was discharged the following day. There were no complications, presentations to the emergency department, or return to the operating room.
Figure 1.

Operative endoscopic views of the gastroesophageal valve: (a) native gastroesophageal valve and (b) reconstructed 3 cm gastroesophageal valve after TIF.

Operative endoscopic views of the gastroesophageal valve: (a) native gastroesophageal valve and (b) reconstructed 3 cm gastroesophageal valve after TIF. The patient was successfully weaned off PPI within 2 weeks following TIF. She completed the same GERD-related questionnaires at 5 and 24 months following the TIF. The improvements are illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1.

GERD questionnaire results.

QuestionnairePreoperative5 months after TIF24 months after TIF
GERD-HRQL2000
RSI1100
GERSS500

GERD: gastroesophageal reflux disease; GERD-HRQL: GERD health-related quality of life; RSI: reflux symptoms index; GERSS: GERD symptom score.

GERD questionnaire results. GERD: gastroesophageal reflux disease; GERD-HRQL: GERD health-related quality of life; RSI: reflux symptoms index; GERSS: GERD symptom score.

Discussion

GERD is one of the most common digestive diseases in the world and also in the United States.[5] For JW patients who experience GERD, their refusal to whole blood and major blood products creates a conflict in the surgical community and results in reluctance to offer anti-reflux procedures. On one hand, the principle of non-maleficence when doing an elective surgery and on the other hand weaning from long-term treatment with PPI which significantly improves quality of life and avoid the significant side effects of PPI.[6] TIF can fill this gap and offer a safe choice of a minimally invasive natural orifice option for JW patients. It has been shown to be safe with minimal bleeding risk.[7-9] Moreover, it is the belief of the author, who has done hundreds of EGDs and currently over 100 TIF procedures, that the TIF procedure does not have a steep learning curve, as it conforms to the essential upper gastrointestinal endoscopic skills and anatomic considerations acquired during endoscopic training. These concepts are reinforced by the training and proctoring provided by EndoGastric Solutions. This patient was the second patient in what is now a high volume anti-reflux center and she had an excellent outcome with successful discontinuation of PPI as shown in Table 1. She continues to be free of GERD symptoms for now more than 24 months.

Conclusion

TIF as a minimally invasive procedure is safe and effective for patients with GERD who refuse blood and/or blood product transfusions. Its effect is durable, even in the early stage of the physician’s learning curve.
  9 in total

1.  Jehovah's Witnesses' refusal of blood: obedience to scripture and religious conscience.

Authors:  D T Ridley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Major abdominal surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses.

Authors:  K E Rollins; U Contractor; R Inumerable; D N Lobo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Transoral incisionless fundoplication: 2-year results from the prospective multicenter U.S. study.

Authors:  Reginald C W Bell; William E Barnes; Bart J Carter; Robert W Sewell; Peter G Mavrelis; Glenn M Ihde; Kevin M Hoddinott; Mark A Fox; Katherine D Freeman; Tanja Gunsberger; Mark G Hausmann; David Dargis; Brian DaCosta Gill; Erik Wilson; Karim S Trad
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-06

Review 5.  Transoral incisionless fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Pier Alberto Testoni; Giorgia Mazzoleni; Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 6.  Systematic review: laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in partial responders to proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Lars Lundell; Martin Bell; Magnus Ruth
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Transoral rotational esophagogastric fundoplication: technical, anatomical, and safety considerations.

Authors:  Reginald C W Bell; Guy-Bernard Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Transoral fundoplication offers durable symptom control for chronic GERD: 3-year report from the TEMPO randomized trial with a crossover arm.

Authors:  Karim S Trad; Mark A Fox; Gilbert Simoni; Ahmad B Shughoury; Peter G Mavrelis; Mamoon Raza; Jeffrey A Heise; William E Barnes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Benefit of Laparoendoscopic Repair of Hiatal Hernia in the Presence of Aberrant Left Hepatic Artery.

Authors:  Medhat Y Fanous
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.