| Literature DB >> 10635500 |
Abstract
Jehovah's Witnesses are students of the Bible. They refuse transfusions out of obedience to the scriptural directive to abstain and keep from blood. Dr Muramoto disagrees with the Witnesses' religious beliefs in this regard. Despite this basic disagreement over the meaning of Biblical texts, Muramoto flouts the religious basis for the Witnesses' position. His proposed policy change about accepting transfusions in private not only conflicts with the Witnesses' fundamental beliefs but it promotes hypocrisy. In addition, Muramoto's arguments about pressure to conform and coerced disclosure of private information misrepresent the beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses and ignore the element of individual conscience. In short, Muramoto resorts to distortion and uncorroborated assertions in his effort to portray a matter of religious faith as a matter of medical ethical debate.Keywords: Professional Patient Relationship; Religious Approach; Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10635500 PMCID: PMC479295 DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.6.469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903