Carla Bastida1,2, Virginia Ruiz-Esquide3, Mariona Pascal4,5, Aurelia H M de Vries Schultink2, Jordi Yagüe4,5, Raimon Sanmartí3, Alwin D R Huitema2,6, Dolors Soy1,5. 1. Pharmacy Department, Division of Medicines, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 2. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 4. Immunology Department, CDB, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 5. IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: Intravenous tocilizumab is currently dosed on body weight, although a weak correlation between body weight and clearance has been described. The aim of the study was to assess the current dosing strategy and provide a scientific rational for dosing using a modelling and simulation approach. METHODS: Serum concentrations and covariates were obtained from intravenous tocilizumab treated subjects at a dose of 4, 6 or 8 mg every 28 days. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. The final model was used to simulate tocilizumab exposure to assess a dosing strategy based on body weight or fixed dosing, using as target a cumulative area under the curve at 24 weeks of treatment above 100 × 103 μg h ml-1 . RESULTS: A one-compartment disposition model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination best described the concentration-time data. The typical population mean values for clearance, apparent volume of distribution, maximum elimination rate and Michaelis-Menten constant were 0.0104 l h-1 , 4.83 l, 0.239 mg h-1 and 4.22 μg ml-1 , respectively. Interindividual variability was included for clearance (17.0%) and volume of distribution (30.8%). Significant covariates for clearance were patient body weight and C-reactive protein serum levels. An estimated exponent for body weight of 0.360 confirms the weak relationship with tocilizumab clearance. Simulations demonstrate that patients with lower weights are at risk of underdosing if the weight-based dosing approach is used. However, fixed-dosing provides a more consistent drug exposure regardless of weight category. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence to support fixed dosing of intravenous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients since it reduces variability in tocilizumab exposure among weight categories compared to the current weight-based dosing approach.
AIMS: Intravenous tocilizumab is currently dosed on body weight, although a weak correlation between body weight and clearance has been described. The aim of the study was to assess the current dosing strategy and provide a scientific rational for dosing using a modelling and simulation approach. METHODS: Serum concentrations and covariates were obtained from intravenous tocilizumab treated subjects at a dose of 4, 6 or 8 mg every 28 days. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. The final model was used to simulate tocilizumab exposure to assess a dosing strategy based on body weight or fixed dosing, using as target a cumulative area under the curve at 24 weeks of treatment above 100 × 103 μg h ml-1 . RESULTS: A one-compartment disposition model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination best described the concentration-time data. The typical population mean values for clearance, apparent volume of distribution, maximum elimination rate and Michaelis-Menten constant were 0.0104 l h-1 , 4.83 l, 0.239 mg h-1 and 4.22 μg ml-1 , respectively. Interindividual variability was included for clearance (17.0%) and volume of distribution (30.8%). Significant covariates for clearance were patient body weight and C-reactive protein serum levels. An estimated exponent for body weight of 0.360 confirms the weak relationship with tocilizumab clearance. Simulations demonstrate that patients with lower weights are at risk of underdosing if the weight-based dosing approach is used. However, fixed-dosing provides a more consistent drug exposure regardless of weight category. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence to support fixed dosing of intravenous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritispatients since it reduces variability in tocilizumab exposure among weight categories compared to the current weight-based dosing approach.
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Andre Beaulieu; Andrea Rubbert-Roth; Cesar Ramos-Remus; Josef Rovensky; Emma Alecock; Thasia Woodworth; Rieke Alten Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-03-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: José Inciarte-Mundo; M Victoria Hernández; Violeta Rosario; Virginia Ruiz-Esquide; Sonia Cabrera-Villalba; Julio Ramírez; Juan D Cañete; Raimon Sanmartí Journal: Reumatol Clin Date: 2013-07-19
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil V Marrion; John A Peters; Elena Faccenda; Simon D Harding; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: G Jones; A Sebba; J Gu; M B Lowenstein; A Calvo; J J Gomez-Reino; D A Siri; M Tomsic; E Alecock; T Woodworth; M C Genovese Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Charlotte Krieckaert; Borja Hernández-Breijo; Johanna Elin Gehin; Guillaume le Mélédo; Alejandro Balsa; Meghna Jani; Denis Mulleman; Victoria Navarro-Compan; Gertjan Wolbink; John Isaac; Astrid van Tubergen Journal: RMD Open Date: 2022-06
Authors: Sophie Stukas; George Goshua; Angus Kinkade; Rebecca Grey; Gregory Mah; Catherine M Biggs; Shahin Jamal; Sonny Thiara; Tim T Y Lau; Jolanta Piszczek; Nilu Partovi; David D Sweet; Agnes Y Y Lee; Cheryl L Wellington; Mypinder S Sekhon; Luke Y C Chen Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-03-23