Carla Bastida1,2, Dolors Soy1,3, Virginia Ruiz-Esquide4, Raimon Sanmartí4, Alwin D R Huitema2,5. 1. Pharmacy Service, Division of Medicines, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 2. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: Tocilizumab has a direct effect on inflammatory markers. Therefore, composite measures for disease activity assessment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using these inflammatory markers may not be suitable for tocilizumab treatment. We used a modelling approach to describe the tocilizumab exposure-response relationship and to investigate the different dynamics of the individual components of the routinely used continuous composite measures. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK), clinical and laboratory data were obtained from a prospective, observational, single-centre study involving 35 subjects with RA treated with intravenous tocilizumab. A population PK/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects models. RESULTS: The population for model development comprised 1086, 1083 and 1082 observations calculated with the disease activity score based on 28 joint (DAS28) and the simplified and clinical disease activity scores (SDAI, CDAI). The tocilizumab exposure-response relationship was described with an indirect-response model. Two main groups of individual components were identified based on their different dynamics under tocilizumab treatment: (i) tender and swollen joint counts and patient and evaluator global assessment showed a slower decrease of their baseline value (half-life: 4.6 weeks, RSE: 24%) and the need for higher serum drug concentration (EC50 : 4.60 μg/mL, RSE: 103%, IIV: 359%) than (ii) C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (half-life: 2.3 weeks, RSE 19%; EC50 : 0.878 μg/mL, RSE: 41%, IIV: 238%). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a different dynamics of the individual components of the most frequently used continuous composite measures under tocilizumab treatment which should be taken into account to avoid misassessment of disease activity.
AIMS: Tocilizumab has a direct effect on inflammatory markers. Therefore, composite measures for disease activity assessment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using these inflammatory markers may not be suitable for tocilizumab treatment. We used a modelling approach to describe the tocilizumab exposure-response relationship and to investigate the different dynamics of the individual components of the routinely used continuous composite measures. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK), clinical and laboratory data were obtained from a prospective, observational, single-centre study involving 35 subjects with RA treated with intravenous tocilizumab. A population PK/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects models. RESULTS: The population for model development comprised 1086, 1083 and 1082 observations calculated with the disease activity score based on 28 joint (DAS28) and the simplified and clinical disease activity scores (SDAI, CDAI). The tocilizumab exposure-response relationship was described with an indirect-response model. Two main groups of individual components were identified based on their different dynamics under tocilizumab treatment: (i) tender and swollen joint counts and patient and evaluator global assessment showed a slower decrease of their baseline value (half-life: 4.6 weeks, RSE: 24%) and the need for higher serum drug concentration (EC50 : 4.60 μg/mL, RSE: 103%, IIV: 359%) than (ii) C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (half-life: 2.3 weeks, RSE 19%; EC50 : 0.878 μg/mL, RSE: 41%, IIV: 238%). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a different dynamics of the individual components of the most frequently used continuous composite measures under tocilizumab treatment which should be taken into account to avoid misassessment of disease activity.
Authors: D M van der Heijde; M A van't Hof; P L van Riel; M A van Leeuwen; M H van Rijswijk; L B van de Putte Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: J S Smolen; F C Breedveld; M H Schiff; J R Kalden; P Emery; G Eberl; P L van Riel; P Tugwell Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: José Inciarte-Mundo; Virginia Ruiz-Esquide; Maria Victoria Hernández; Juan D Cañete; Sonia Raquel Cabrera-Villalba; Julio Ramirez; Jordi Yagüe; Raimon Sanmarti Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: D T Felson; J J Anderson; M Boers; C Bombardier; D Furst; C Goldsmith; L M Katz; R Lightfoot; H Paulus; V Strand Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1995-06
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian Bykerk; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Tore K Kvien; M Victoria Navarro-Compán; Susan Oliver; Monika Schoels; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; Tanja Stamm; Michaela Stoffer; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Daniel Aletaha; Jose Louis Andreu; Martin Aringer; Martin Bergman; Neil Betteridge; Hans Bijlsma; Harald Burkhardt; Mario Cardiel; Bernard Combe; Patrick Durez; Joao Eurico Fonseca; Alan Gibofsky; Juan J Gomez-Reino; Winfried Graninger; Pekka Hannonen; Boulos Haraoui; Marios Kouloumas; Robert Landewe; Emilio Martin-Mola; Peter Nash; Mikkel Ostergaard; Andrew Östör; Pam Richards; Tuulikki Sokka-Isler; Carter Thorne; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Martinus de Wit; Desirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Simon D Harding; Joanna L Sharman; Elena Faccenda; Chris Southan; Adam J Pawson; Sam Ireland; Alasdair J G Gray; Liam Bruce; Stephen P H Alexander; Stephen Anderton; Clare Bryant; Anthony P Davenport; Christian Doerig; Doriano Fabbro; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Artur Świerczek; Krzysztof Pociecha; Hanna Plutecka; Marietta Ślusarczyk; Grażyna Chłoń-Rzepa; Elżbieta Wyska Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 6.525