Susan L Zickmund1,2, Kelly H Burkitt3, Shasha Gao3, Roslyn A Stone3,4, Audrey L Jones5,6, Leslie R M Hausmann3,7, Galen E Switzer3,7,8, Sonya Borrero3,7, Keri L Rodriguez3,7, Michael J Fine3,7. 1. Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS 2.0), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Susan.Zickmund@va.gov. 2. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Susan.Zickmund@va.gov. 3. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS 2.0), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 6. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 7. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 8. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important dimension of health care quality. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) is committed to providing high-quality care to an increasingly diverse patient population. OBJECTIVE: To assess Veteran satisfaction with VA health care by race/ethnicity and gender. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with gender-specific stratified samples of black, white, and Hispanic Veterans from 25 predominantly minority-serving VA Medical Centers from June 2013 to January 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Satisfaction with health care was assessed in 16 domains using five-point Likert scales. We compared the proportions of Veterans who were very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and less than satisfied (i.e., neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied) in each domain, and used random-effects multinomial regression to estimate racial/ethnic differences by gender and gender differences by race/ethnicity. KEY RESULTS: Interviews were completed for 1222 of the 1929 Veterans known to be eligible for the interview (63.3%), including 421 white, 389 black, and 396 Hispanic Veterans, 616 of whom were female. Veterans were less likely to be somewhat satisfied or less than satisfied versus very satisfied with care in each of the 16 domains. The highest satisfaction ratings were reported for costs, outpatient facilities, and pharmacy (74-76% very satisfied); the lowest ratings were reported for access, pain management, and mental health care (21-24% less than satisfied). None of the joint tests of racial/ethnic or gender differences in satisfaction (simultaneously comparing all three satisfaction levels) was statistically significant (p > 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of specific levels of satisfaction revealed racial/ethnic differences by gender in three domains and gender differences by race/ethnicity in five domains, with no consistent directionality across demographic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our multisite interviews of a diverse sample of Veterans at primarily minority-serving sites showed generally high levels of health care satisfaction across 16 domains, with few quantitative differences by race/ethnicity or gender.
BACKGROUND:Patient satisfaction is an important dimension of health care quality. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) is committed to providing high-quality care to an increasingly diverse patient population. OBJECTIVE: To assess Veteran satisfaction with VA health care by race/ethnicity and gender. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with gender-specific stratified samples of black, white, and Hispanic Veterans from 25 predominantly minority-serving VA Medical Centers from June 2013 to January 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Satisfaction with health care was assessed in 16 domains using five-point Likert scales. We compared the proportions of Veterans who were very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and less than satisfied (i.e., neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied) in each domain, and used random-effects multinomial regression to estimate racial/ethnic differences by gender and gender differences by race/ethnicity. KEY RESULTS: Interviews were completed for 1222 of the 1929 Veterans known to be eligible for the interview (63.3%), including 421 white, 389 black, and 396 Hispanic Veterans, 616 of whom were female. Veterans were less likely to be somewhat satisfied or less than satisfied versus very satisfied with care in each of the 16 domains. The highest satisfaction ratings were reported for costs, outpatient facilities, and pharmacy (74-76% very satisfied); the lowest ratings were reported for access, pain management, and mental health care (21-24% less than satisfied). None of the joint tests of racial/ethnic or gender differences in satisfaction (simultaneously comparing all three satisfaction levels) was statistically significant (p > 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of specific levels of satisfaction revealed racial/ethnic differences by gender in three domains and gender differences by race/ethnicity in five domains, with no consistent directionality across demographic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our multisite interviews of a diverse sample of Veterans at primarily minority-serving sites showed generally high levels of health care satisfaction across 16 domains, with few quantitative differences by race/ethnicity or gender.
Entities:
Keywords:
health care disparities; patient satisfaction; veterans
Authors: Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thomas D Sequist; Eric C Schneider; Michael Anastario; Esosa G Odigie; Richard Marshall; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Stefan G Kertesz; Leslie R M Hausmann; Maria K Mor; Ying Suo; Warren B P Pettey; James H Schaefer; Adi V Gundlapalli; Adam J Gordon Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-02-29
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Michael J Fine; Roslyn A Stone; Shasha Gao; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kelly H Burkitt; Peter A Taber; Galen E Switzer; Chester B Good; Megan E Vanneman; Susan L Zickmund Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrea L Nevedal; Todd H Wagner; Laura S Ellerbe; Steven M Asch; Christopher J Koenig Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elisheva R Danan; Scott E Sherman; Barbara A Clothier; Diana J Burgess; Erika A Pinsker; Anne M Joseph; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Steven S Fu Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2019-06-25
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Michael J Fine; Peter A Taber; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kelly H Burkitt; Roslyn A Stone; Susan L Zickmund Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178