Background and Aims: Amazonia is a major world centre of plant domestication, but little is known about how the crops were dispersed across the region. Manioc (Manihot esculenta) was domesticated in the south-western Amazon basin, and is the most important staple food crop that originated in Amazonia. Current contrasting distributions may reflect distinct histories of dispersal of bitter and sweet manioc landraces. To produce new insights into the evolutionary history of the crop, we investigated the contemporary genetic diversity and structure of bitter and sweet manioc along major Amazonian rivers. Methods: The patterns of genetic structure and diversity of wild and cultivated sweet and bitter manioc with four chloroplast and 14 nuclear microsatellite markers were evaluated. Results were interpreted in terms of the crop's dispersal. Key results: No phylogeographic patterns among rivers were detected, and genetic structure among rivers was confounded by the bitter-sweet divergence. However, differences in the distribution of nuclear diversity and somewhat distinctive patterns of genetic structure across rivers were observed within bitter and sweet manioc. Conclusions: Various pre-Columbian and post-European conquest events in the history of Amazonian occupation may explain the absence of clearer patterns of genetic structure. However, the wide distribution of the most common chloroplast haplotype agrees with an early dispersal of manioc across Brazilian Amazonia. Furthermore, differences in genetic structure and in the spatial distribution of genetic diversity suggest that bitter and sweet manioc had distinct dispersal histories. Knowledge about how prehistoric and contemporary Amazonian peoples manage their crops is valuable for the maintenance and conservation of the impressive diversity of their native crops.
Background and Aims: Amazonia is a major world centre of plant domestication, but little is known about how the crops were dispersed across the region. Manioc (Manihot esculenta) was domesticated in the south-western Amazon basin, and is the most important staple food crop that originated in Amazonia. Current contrasting distributions may reflect distinct histories of dispersal of bitter and sweet manioc landraces. To produce new insights into the evolutionary history of the crop, we investigated the contemporary genetic diversity and structure of bitter and sweet manioc along major Amazonian rivers. Methods: The patterns of genetic structure and diversity of wild and cultivated sweet and bitter manioc with four chloroplast and 14 nuclear microsatellite markers were evaluated. Results were interpreted in terms of the crop's dispersal. Key results: No phylogeographic patterns among rivers were detected, and genetic structure among rivers was confounded by the bitter-sweet divergence. However, differences in the distribution of nuclear diversity and somewhat distinctive patterns of genetic structure across rivers were observed within bitter and sweet manioc. Conclusions: Various pre-Columbian and post-European conquest events in the history of Amazonian occupation may explain the absence of clearer patterns of genetic structure. However, the wide distribution of the most common chloroplast haplotype agrees with an early dispersal of manioc across Brazilian Amazonia. Furthermore, differences in genetic structure and in the spatial distribution of genetic diversity suggest that bitter and sweet manioc had distinct dispersal histories. Knowledge about how prehistoric and contemporary Amazonian peoples manage their crops is valuable for the maintenance and conservation of the impressive diversity of their native crops.
Authors: E Jane Bradbury; Anne Duputié; Marc Delêtre; Caroline Roullier; Alexandra Narváez-Trujillo; Joseph A Manu-Aduening; Eve Emshwiller; Doyle McKey Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Alex C Ogbonna; Luciano Rogerio Braatz de Andrade; Lukas A Mueller; Eder Jorge de Oliveira; Guillaume J Bauchet Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Alessandro Alves-Pereira; Maria Imaculada Zucchi; Charles R Clement; João Paulo Gomes Viana; José Baldin Pinheiro; Elizabeth Ann Veasey; Anete Pereira de Souza Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jennifer Watling; Myrtle P Shock; Guilherme Z Mongeló; Fernando O Almeida; Thiago Kater; Paulo E De Oliveira; Eduardo G Neves Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240