Literature DB >> 23548671

Geographic differences in patterns of genetic differentiation among bitter and sweet manioc (Manihot esculenta subsp. esculenta; Euphorbiaceae).

E Jane Bradbury1, Anne Duputié, Marc Delêtre, Caroline Roullier, Alexandra Narváez-Trujillo, Joseph A Manu-Aduening, Eve Emshwiller, Doyle McKey.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Manioc (Manihot esculenta subsp. esculenta), one of the most important tropical food crops, is commonly divided according to cyanide content into two use-categories, "sweet" and "bitter." While bitter and sweet varieties are genetically differentiated at the local scale, whether this differentiation is consistent across continents is yet unknown. •
METHODS: Using eight microsatellite loci, we genotyped 522 manioc samples (135 bitter and 387 sweet) from Ecuador, French Guiana, Cameroon, Gabon, Ghana, and Vanuatu. Genetic differentiation between use-categories was assessed using double principal coordinate analyses (DPCoA) with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Jost's measure of estimated differentiation (D(est)). Genetic structure was analyzed using Bayesian clustering analysis. • KEY
RESULTS: Manioc neutral genetic diversity was high in all sampled regions. Sweet and bitter manioc landraces are differentiated in South America but not in Africa. Correspondingly, bitter and sweet manioc samples share a higher proportion of neutral alleles in Africa than in South America. We also found seven clones classified by some farmers as sweet and by others as bitter. •
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of differentiation in Africa is most likely due to postintroduction hybridization between bitter and sweet manioc. Inconsistent transfer from South America to Africa of ethnobotanical knowledge surrounding use-category management may contribute to increased hybridization in Africa. Investigating this issue requires more data on the variation in cyanogenesis in roots within and among manioc populations and how manioc diversity is managed on the farm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Euphorbiaceae; cassava; crop management; crop migration; cyanogenesis; domestication; microsatellite loci; population structure; small-holder agriculture

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548671     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  5 in total

1.  Patterns of nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity and structure of manioc along major Brazilian Amazonian rivers.

Authors:  Alessandro Alves-Pereira; Charles R Clement; Doriane Picanço-Rodrigues; Elizabeth A Veasey; Gabriel Dequigiovanni; Santiago L F Ramos; José B Pinheiro; Maria I Zucchi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  High genetic diversity among and within bitter manioc varieties cultivated in different soil types in Central Amazonia.

Authors:  Alessandro Alves-Pereira; Nivaldo Peroni; Marcelo Mattos Cavallari; Maristerra R Lemes; Maria Imaculada Zucchi; Charles R Clement
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  Large-scale genome-wide association study, using historical data, identifies conserved genetic architecture of cyanogenic glucoside content in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) root.

Authors:  Alex C Ogbonna; Luciano Rogerio Braatz de Andrade; Ismail Y Rabbi; Lukas A Mueller; Eder Jorge de Oliveira; Guillaume J Bauchet
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Selective signatures and high genome-wide diversity in traditional Brazilian manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties.

Authors:  Alessandro Alves-Pereira; Maria Imaculada Zucchi; Charles R Clement; João Paulo Gomes Viana; José Baldin Pinheiro; Elizabeth Ann Veasey; Anete Pereira de Souza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effect of genotype and genotype by environment interaction on total cyanide content, fresh root, and starch yield in farmer-preferred cassava landraces in Tanzania.

Authors:  Mariam K Mtunguja; Henry S Laswai; Edward Kanju; Joseph Ndunguru; Yasinta C Muzanila
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.863

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.