Literature DB >> 29305733

Preclinical ex vivo evaluation of the diagnostic performance of a new device for in situ label-free fluorescence spectral analysis of breast masses.

Marie-Christine Mathieu1, Alexis Toullec2, Charlotte Benoit3, Richard Berry4, Pierre Validire4, Pauline Beaumel3, Yves Vincent5, Pierre Maroun6, Philippe Vielh6, Lama Alchab2, René Farcy7, Hélène Moniz-Koum3, Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart2, Suzette Delaloge6, Corinne Balleyguier6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of a new device for in situ label-free fluorescence spectral analysis of breast masses in freshly removed surgical specimens, in preparation for its clinical development.
METHODS: Sixty-four breast masses from consenting patients who had undergone either a lumpectomy or a mastectomy were included. Label-free fluorescence spectral acquisitions were obtained with a 25G fibre-containing needle inserted into the mass. Data from benign and malignant masses were compared to establish the most discriminating thresholds and measurement algorithms. Accuracy was verified using the bootstrap method.
RESULTS: The final histological examination revealed 44 invasive carcinomas and 20 benign lesions. The maximum intensity of fluorescence signal was discriminant between benign and malignant masses (p < .0001) whatever their sizes. Statistical analysis indicated that choosing five random measurements per mass was the best compromise to obtain high sensitivity and high negative predictive value with the fewest measurements. Thus, malignant tumours were identified with a mean sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of 98.8%, 85.4%, 97.2% and 93.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This new in situ tissue autofluorescence evaluation device allows accurate discrimination between benign and malignant breast masses and deserves clinical development. KEY POINTS: • A new device allows in situ label-free fluorescence analysis of ex vivo breast masses • Maximum fluorescence intensity discriminates benign from malignant masses (p < .0001) • Five random measurements allow a high negative predictive value (97.2%).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endogenous fluorescence; Fresh breast mass; Minimally invasive device; Optical imaging; Real-time diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305733     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5228-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

Review 1.  Benign breast disorders.

Authors:  Michaela Onstad; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Diagnosing breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Zoya Volynskaya; Abigail S Haka; Kate L Bechtel; Maryann Fitzmaurice; Robert Shenk; Nancy Wang; Jon Nazemi; Ramachandra R Dasari; Michael S Feld
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  A comparison of autofluorescence bronchoscopy and white light bronchoscopy in detection of lung cancer and preneoplastic lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weizhen Chen; Xiaofang Gao; Qing Tian; Liangan Chen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Native fluorescence spectra of human cancerous and normal breast tissues analyzed with non-negative constraint methods.

Authors:  Yang Pu; Wubao Wang; Yuanlong Yang; Robert R Alfano
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 5.  Physiological and pathological factors of human breast disease that can influence optical diagnosis.

Authors:  S Thomsen; D Tatman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-02-09       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Towards an optical biopsy for the diagnosis of breast cancer in vivo by endogenous fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lama Alchab; Guillaume Dupuis; Corinne Balleyguier; Marie-Christine Mathieu; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart; René Farcy
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  The challenge of rapid diagnosis in oncology: Diagnostic accuracy and cost analysis of a large-scale one-stop breast clinic.

Authors:  Suzette Delaloge; Julia Bonastre; Isabelle Borget; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Rachel Fontenay; Diane Boinon; Mahasti Saghatchian; Marie-Christine Mathieu; Chafika Mazouni; Sofia Rivera; Catherine Uzan; Fabrice André; Clarisse Dromain; Bruno Boyer; Barbara Pistilli; Sandy Azoulay; Françoise Rimareix; El-Hadi Bayou; Benjamin Sarfati; Hélène Caron; Amal Ghouadni; Nicolas Leymarie; Sandra Canale; Muriel Mons; Julia Arfi-Rouche; Monica Arnedos; Voichita Suciu; Philippe Vielh; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Diagnosis of breast cancer using fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: a Monte-Carlo-model-based approach.

Authors:  Changfang Zhu; Gregory M Palmer; Tara M Breslin; Josephine Harter; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Changfang Zhu; Tara M Breslin; Fushen Xu; Kennedy W Gilchrist; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Pulmonary Endogenous Fluorescence Allows the Distinction of Primary Lung Cancer from the Perilesional Lung Parenchyma.

Authors:  Lucile Gust; Alexis Toullec; Charlotte Benoit; René Farcy; Stéphane Garcia; Veronique Secq; Jean-Yves Gaubert; Delphine Trousse; Bastien Orsini; Christophe Doddoli; Helene Moniz-Koum; Pascal Alexandre Thomas; Xavier Benoit D'journo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fluorescence lifetime needle optical biopsy discriminates hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Evgenii A Zherebtsov; Elena V Potapova; Andrian V Mamoshin; Valery V Shupletsov; Ksenia Y Kandurova; Viktor V Dremin; Andrey Y Abramov; Andrey V Dunaev
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Autofluorescence imaging within the liver: a promising tool for the detection and characterization of primary liver tumors.

Authors:  Charlotte Benoit; Aurélie Rodrigues; Julien Calderaro; Cécile Charpy; Sylvie Simonin; Jean-Charles Deybach; Laurent Gouya; Hervé Puy; Caroline Schmitt; René Farcy; Valérie Vilgrain; Valérie Paradis; Nicolas Pote; Fouad Lafdil; Sébastien Mule; Emmanuel Itti; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optical percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver: a pilot animal and clinical study.

Authors:  Viktor Dremin; Elena Potapova; Evgeny Zherebtsov; Ksenia Kandurova; Valery Shupletsov; Alexander Alekseyev; Andrian Mamoshin; Andrey Dunaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.