Literature DB >> 29305720

Barriers for the implementation of guidelines in palliative care-results from a national survey of professionals.

Helen Kalies1, Rieke Schöttmer1, Steffen T Simon2, Raymond Voltz2, Alexander Crispin3, Claudia Bausewein4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2015, an evidence- and consensus-based palliative care guideline in adults with incurable cancer was published by the German Guideline Program. Barriers and enablers for the guideline implementation of members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) were unknown. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to evaluate professionals' knowledge, motivation, and outcome expectancy towards already existing recommendations for palliative care and (2) to evaluate the self-experienced competence in five medical key topics presented in the new guideline.
METHODS: A web-based online survey with all DGP members in 2014 using a specifically designed questionnaire including 62 questions was used. Independent predictors for identified barriers were analysed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: All 4786 members with known email address were invited, 1181 followed the link, 1138 began to answer, and 1031 completed the questionnaire. Fifty-four percent know already existing recommendations concerning palliative care, 8.4% know and use these recommendations; of the latter group, 44.2% do not notice any improvement of their treatment when applying them. Of key symptoms addressed in the guideline, depression was the symptom with lowest perceived competence (63.7 vs. > 90% for other symptoms). Non-physicians and those working in settings with little contact to seriously ill or dying patients feel less competent in almost all symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Emphasis on the high-quality and evidence- and consensus-based character of the guideline should be underlined in future implementation processes. Implementation strategies should focus on depression and non-physicians and those professionals working in settings with little contact to seriously ill patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers and enablers; Germany; Guidelines; Implementation; National survey; Palliative care; Predictors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305720     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-4030-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  25 in total

1.  Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care: results of a survey in 2 areas in Germany.

Authors:  A Meining; U Driesnack; M Classen; T Rösch
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 2.  Interventions to implement prevention in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; T van Der Weijden; R Grol
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

3.  Attitudes to clinical guidelines--do GPs differ from other medical doctors?

Authors:  B Carlsen; B Bringedal
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards.

Authors:  D F Lobach; W E Hammond
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 5.  The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies--a synthesis of systematic review findings.

Authors:  Mathew Prior; Michelle Guerin; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.

Authors:  Young Ik Cho; Timothy P Johnson; Jonathan B Vangeest
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Long-term changes in dyspnea, lung function, and exercise capacity in COPD patients.

Authors:  Vladimir A Hodgev; Stefan S Kostianev; Anahid A Torosian; Ivan B Yanev; Penka B Mandoulova
Journal:  Folia Med (Plovdiv)       Date:  2004

8.  Hypertension guidelines and their limitations--the impact of physicians' compliance as evaluated by guideline awareness.

Authors:  J Hagemeister; C A Schneider; S Barabas; R Schadt; G Wassmer; G Mager; H Pfaff; H W Höpp
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Identifying determinants of care for tailoring implementation in chronic diseases: an evaluation of different methods.

Authors:  Jane Krause; Jan Van Lieshout; Rien Klomp; Elke Huntink; Eivind Aakhus; Signe Flottorp; Cornelia Jaeger; Jost Steinhaeuser; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Anna Kowalczyk; Shona Agarwal; Michel Wensing; Richard Baker
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  Palliative care in everyday practice of radiation oncologists : Results from a web-based survey among medical members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).

Authors:  Janina Fels; Steffi Pigorsch; Hilke Vorwerk; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Birgitt van Oorschot
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Palliative Care in German Comprehensive Cancer Centers - an evaluation of the implementation status.

Authors:  Sarah Lödel; Christoph Ostgathe; Maria Heckel; Karin Oechsle; Susanne Gahr
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Development of a national strategy with recommendations for the care of seriously ill and dying people and their relatives in pandemics: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Sonja Gauder; Anne Pralong; Constanze Rémi; Farina Hodiamont; Isabell Klinger; Maria Heckel; Steffen T Simon; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.713

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.