Literature DB >> 23975761

Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.

Young Ik Cho1, Timothy P Johnson, Jonathan B Vangeest.   

Abstract

Surveys involving health care providers are characterized by low and declining response rates (RRs), and researchers have utilized various strategies to increase survey RRs among health professionals. Based on 48 studies with 156 subgroups of within-study conditions, a multilevel meta-regression analysis was conducted to summarize the effects of different strategies employed in surveys of health professionals. An estimated overall survey RR among health professionals was 0.53 with a significant downward trend during the last half century. Of the variables that were examined, mode of data collection, incentives, and number of follow-up attempts were all found to be significantly related to RR. The mail survey mode was more effective in improving RR, compared to the online or web survey mode. Relative to the non-incentive subgroups, subgroups receiving monetary incentives were more likely to respond, while nonmonetary incentive groups were not significantly different from non-incentive groups. When number of follow-ups was considered, the one or two attempts of follow-up were found to be effective in increasing survey RR among health professionals. Having noted challenges associated with surveying health professionals, researchers must make every effort to improve access to their target population by implementing appropriate incentive- and design-based strategies demonstrated to improve participation rates.

Keywords:  health professionals; meta-analysis; research methods; response rates; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975761     DOI: 10.1177/0163278713496425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  120 in total

1.  Association of both consistency and strength of self-reported clinician recommendation for HPV vaccination and HPV vaccine uptake among 11- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Jennifer L St Sauver; Timothy J Beebe; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan T Vadaparampil; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Robert M Jacobson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Knowledge and Preferences of Primary Care Providers in Delivering Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care.

Authors:  Callie Berkowitz; Deborah H Allen; Jennifer Tenhover; Leah L Zullig; John Ragsdale; Jonathan E Fischer; Kathryn I Pollak; Bridget F Koontz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  How to assess a survey report: a guide for readers and peer reviewers.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Michelle E Kho
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Education in Nephrology Fellowship: A Survey-Based Needs Assessment.

Authors:  Robert W Rope; Kurtis A Pivert; Mark G Parker; Stephen M Sozio; Sylvia Bereknyei Merell
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Low-Value Care and Clinician Engagement in a Large Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO: a Survey of Frontline Clinicians.

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Michael D Rozier; Andrew M Ryan; Susan D Goold; John Z Ayanian; Edward C Norton; Timothy A Peterson; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Ellen Funkhouser; Kavya Vellala; Camille Baltuck; Rita Cacciato; Emily Durand; Deborah McEdward; Ellen Sowell; Sarah E Theisen; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Surveying multiple health professional team members within institutional settings: an example from the nursing home industry.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Anthony Roman; Michelle L Rogers; Denise A Tyler; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Examining Physician Interactions with Disease Advocacy Organizations.

Authors:  Caroline Horrow; Joel E Pacyna; Carol Cosenza; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-08-26

9.  Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey.

Authors:  Hillary Bonuedie; Esther Kim; Judith Long; Kira Ryskina
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Among Musculoskeletal Surgeons, Job Dissatisfaction Is Associated With Burnout.

Authors:  Olivier D R van Wulfften Palthe; Valentin Neuhaus; Stein J Janssen; Thierry G Guitton; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.