Literature DB >> 32948892

Non-selective inhibition of the motor system following unexpected and expected infrequent events.

Carly Iacullo1, Darcy A Diesburg1, Jan R Wessel2,3.   

Abstract

Motor inhibition is a key control mechanism that allows humans to rapidly adapt their actions in response to environmental events. One of the hallmark signatures of rapidly exerted, reactive motor inhibition is the non-selective suppression of cortico-spinal excitability (CSE): unexpected sensory stimuli lead to a suppression of CSE across the entire motor system, even in muscles that are inactive. Theories suggest that this reflects a fast, automatic, and broad engagement of inhibitory control, which facilitates behavioral adaptations to unexpected changes in the sensory environment. However, it is an open question whether such non-selective CSE suppression is truly due to the unexpected nature of the sensory event, or whether it is sufficient for an event to be merely infrequent (but not unexpected). Here, we report data from two experiments in which human subjects experienced both unexpected and expected infrequent events during a two-alternative forced-choice reaction time task while CSE was measured from a task-unrelated muscle. We found that expected infrequent events can indeed produce non-selective CSE suppression-but only when they occur during movement initiation. In contrast, unexpected infrequent events produce non-selective CSE suppression relative to frequent, expected events even in the absence of movement initiation. Moreover, CSE suppression due to unexpected events occurs at shorter latencies compared to expected infrequent events. These findings demonstrate that unexpectedness and stimulus infrequency have qualitatively different suppressive effects on the motor system. They also have key implications for studies that seek to disentangle neural and psychological processes related to motor inhibition and stimulus detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortico-motor excitability; Motor evoked potentials; Motor inhibition; Oddball; Surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32948892      PMCID: PMC7717674          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05919-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  67 in total

1.  Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.

Authors:  Nichola Rice Cohen; Emily S Cross; Eugene Tunik; Scott T Grafton; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Leveling the Field for a Fairer Race between Going and Stopping: Neural Evidence for the Race Model of Motor Inhibition from a New Version of the Stop Signal Task.

Authors:  Tobin Dykstra; Darcy A Waller; Eliot Hazeltine; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Proactive selective response suppression is implemented via the basal ganglia.

Authors:  D S Adnan Majid; Weidong Cai; Jody Corey-Bloom; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Impairment of retention but not acquisition of a visuomotor skill through time-dependent disruption of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Arash Hadipour-Niktarash; Christine K Lee; John E Desmond; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Release the BEESTS: Bayesian Estimation of Ex-Gaussian STop-Signal reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Dora Matzke; Jonathon Love; Thomas V Wiecki; Scott D Brown; Gordon D Logan; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-10

8.  A functional network perspective on response inhibition and attentional control.

Authors:  Michelle Erika-Florence; Robert Leech; Adam Hampshire
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account.

Authors:  Heike Elchlepp; Aureliu Lavric; Christopher D Chambers; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Dissociating inhibition, attention, and response control in the frontoparietal network using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chris M Dodds; Sharon Morein-Zamir; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages.

Authors:  Joshua R Tatz; Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Authors:  Corey G Wadsley; John Cirillo; Arne Nieuwenhuys; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Paired-pulse TMS and scalp EEG reveal systematic relationship between inhibitory GABAa signaling in M1 and fronto-central cortical activity during action stopping.

Authors:  Megan Hynd; Cheol Soh; Benjamin O Rangel; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural correlates of unpredictable Stop and non-Stop cues in overt and imagined execution.

Authors:  Alberto González-Villar; Santiago Galdo-Álvarez; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.348

Review 5.  The Pause-then-Cancel model of human action-stopping: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Darcy A Diesburg; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 9.052

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.