| Literature DB >> 29304858 |
Antonio Bosco1, Maria Paola Maurelli2, Davide Ianniello1, Maria Elena Morgoglione1, Alessandra Amadesi1, Gerald C Coles3, Giuseppe Cringoli1, Laura Rinaldi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nematode infections in horses are widespread across the world. Increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance, reported worldwide in equine parasites, have led to the creation of programs for the control of nematodes based on faecal egg counts (FEC). To improve nematode egg counting in equine faecal samples and establish whether the matrix of equine faeces or the eggs affect the counts, the analytical sensitivity, accuracy and precision of Mini-FLOTAC (combined with Fill-FLOTAC), McMaster and Cornell-Wisconsin techniques were compared. Known numbers of eggs extracted from equine or ovine faeces were added to egg free ovine and equine faeces to give counts of 10, 50, 200 and 500 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces.Entities:
Keywords: Fill-FLOTAC; Horses; Mini-FLOTAC; Nematodes; Sheep
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29304858 PMCID: PMC5756441 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Schematic features of Mini-FLOTAC, McMaster (grid and chamber) and Cornell-Wisconsin techniques
| FEC Techniques | Amount of faeces used (grams) | Dilution Ratio | Reading Volume (ml) | Reading Area (mm2) | Analytical sensitivity (EPG) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-FLOTAC | 5 | 1:10 | 2.0 | 648 | 5 |
| McMaster | 3 | 1:15 | 0.30 | 200 | 50 |
| McMaster | 3 | 1:15 | 1.0 | 648 | 15 |
| Cornell-Wisconsin | 5 | 1:10 | 10 | 324 | 1 |
The weight of faeces used for each replicate, dilution ratio, reading volume, reading area and analytical sensitivity of Mini-FLOTAC, two versions of McMaster (grid and chamber) and Cornell-Wisconsin egg counting
Fig. 1Analytical sensitivity (% of positive test results across the replicates) of each FEC technique using nematode egg suspensions of 10 EPG for the four cross-contaminations (a) and of 50 EPG for the four cross-contaminations (b)
Mean CV% for Mini-FLOTAC, McMaster and Cornell-Wisconsin at the different egg count levels and for each method evaluated in this study
| Method | 10 EPG | 50 EPG | 200 EPG | 500 EPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-FLOTAC | 49.6% | 10.9% | 8.1% | 3.1% |
| McMaster | 248.6% | 90.5% | 39.9% | 17.3% |
| McMaster | 135.6% | 51.4% | 23.1% | 10.9% |
| Cornell-Wisconsin | 33.4% | 16.6% | 51.8% | 5.2% |
Mean number of detected eggs for Mini-FLOTAC, McMaster and Cornell-Wisconsin at the different egg count levels and for each method evaluated in this study
| Method | 10 EPG | 50 EPG | 200 EPG | 500 EPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-FLOTAC | 9 | 45 | 192 | 409 |
| McMaster | 8 | 49 | 179 | 492 |
| McMaster | 7 | 39 | 167 | 461 |
| Cornell-Wisconsin | 4 | 19 | 104 | 248 |
Fig. 2Boxplots of observed faecal egg counts (y axis) with: Mini-FLOTAC method (a), McMaster grid (b), McMaster chamber (c), Cornell-Wisconsin (d) for the four 4 levels of egg excretion (x-axis)