Literature DB >> 15265576

The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep.

G Cringoli1, L Rinaldi, V Veneziano, G Capelli, A Scala.   

Abstract

The present study was aimed to evaluate the influence of flotation solution, sample dilution, and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal (GI) strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in a composite sample of faeces from naturally infected sheep. Fourteen flotation solutions having densities between 1.200 and 1.450, and six sample dilutions, 1:10, 1:15, 1:20, 1:30, 1:40 and 1:50 were used. Each of the six dilutions was divided into 70 aliquots in order to have five replicates of each of the 14 flotation solutions at each of the six dilutions. For each McMaster slide, the GI strongyle and D. dendriticum egg counts were performed under one grid (McM 0.15 ml), two grids (McM 0.3 ml), one chamber (McM 0.5 ml), and both chambers (McM 1.0 ml). Mean eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces of GI strongyles and D. dendriticum were calculated and statistical analyses were performed on the resulting data. The type of flotation solution used significantly influenced the EPG in the GI strongyles and in the D. dendriticum egg counts. All the sucrose-based solutions at density between 1.200 and 1.350 floated more GI strongyle eggs than the others. With respect to D. dendriticum, only six solutions were capable of floating eggs and the potassium iodomercurate solution (density 1.440) floated more eggs than the others. The reliability of the McMaster technique regarding sample dilution was high for both GI strongyle and D. dendriticum EPG at 1:10 and 1:15, and then progressively decreased with increasing dilution. The reliability of the McMaster technique regarding the choice of the McMaster slide area (volume) was high for both GI strongyle and D. dendriticum EPG at the McMaster slide area (volume) of 1.0 ml, i.e. the total area of the McMaster slide. The EPG counts resulting from choosing any of the other three McMaster slide areas (volumes), i.e. McM 0.15 ml, McM 0.3 ml, or McM 0.5 ml, produced unreliable over-estimates. The findings of the present study show that the highest reliability of the McMaster technique for estimating GI strongyle and D. dendriticum egg counts in faeces from pastured sheep is obtained when using flotation solutions based on sucrose for GI strongyles, and potassium iodomercurate for D. dendriticum, dilutions which do not exceed 1:15, and the McMaster slide area (volume) of 1.0 ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15265576     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  45 in total

1.  Comparison of the FLOTAC technique with the McMaster method and the Baermann technique to determine counts of Dictyocaulus eckerti L1 and strongylid eggs in faeces of red deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  Benjamin U Bauer; William E Pomroy; Julien Gueydon; Samuel Gannac; Ian Scott; Kurt Pfister
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes from grazing beef cattle in Campeche State, Mexico.

Authors:  Abel Muñiz-Lagunes; Roberto González-Garduño; Maria Eugenia López-Arellano; Rodolfo Ramírez-Valverde; Agustín Ruíz-Flores; Guadalupe García-Muñiz; Gabriel Ramírez-Vargas; Pedro Mendoza-de Gives; Glafiro Torres-Hernández
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Gastrointestinal strongyle Faecal Egg Count in goats: circadian rhythm and relationship with worm burden.

Authors:  G Cringoli; L Rinaldi; V Veneziano; S Pennacchio; M E Morgoglione; M Santaniello; M Schioppi; V Fedele
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Which McMaster egg counting technique is the most reliable?

Authors:  Jaroslav Vadlejch; Miloslav Petrtýl; Igor Zaichenko; Zuzana Cadková; Ivana Jankovská; Iva Langrová; Milan Moravec
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  The influence of glyphosate on the microbiota and production of botulinum neurotoxin during ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  Wagis Ackermann; Manfred Coenen; Wieland Schrödl; Awad A Shehata; Monika Krüger
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  A dual anthelmintic treatment strategic scheme for the control of fasciolosis in dairy sheep farms.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cringoli; Laura Rinaldi; Vincenzo Veneziano; Claudio Genchi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Passalurus ambiguus: new insights into copromicroscopic diagnosis and circadian rhythm of egg excretion.

Authors:  Laura Rinaldi; Tamara Russo; Mariangela Schioppi; Saverio Pennacchio; Giuseppe Cringoli
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences.

Authors:  Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  The helminth community of a population of Rattus norvegicus from an urban Brazilian slum and the threat of zoonotic diseases.

Authors:  Ticiana Carvalho-Pereira; Fábio N Souza; Luana R N Santos; Ruth Walker; Arsinoê C Pertile; Daiana S de Oliveira; Gabriel G Pedra; Amanda Minter; Maria Gorete Rodrigues; Thiago C Bahiense; Mitermayer G Reis; Peter J Diggle; Albert I Ko; James E Childs; Eduardo M da Silva; Mike Begon; Federico Costa
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Crenosoma vulpis in dog: first case report in Italy and use of the FLOTAC technique for copromicroscopic diagnosis.

Authors:  L Rinaldi; G Calabria; S Carbone; A Carrella; G Cringoli
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.