Literature DB >> 25002307

Comparison of individual and pooled faecal samples in sheep for the assessment of gastrointestinal strongyle infection intensity and anthelmintic drug efficacy using McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC.

Laura Rinaldi1, Bruno Levecke2, Antonio Bosco3, Davide Ianniello3, Paola Pepe3, Johannes Charlier2, Giuseppe Cringoli3, Jozef Vercruysse2.   

Abstract

A field study was conducted to validate pooled faecal samples in sheep for the assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) strongyle infection intensity (faecal egg count - FEC) and anthelmintic drug efficacy (FEC reduction - FECR). Ten sheep farms located in the Campania region of southern Italy were selected for the study. In each farm, individual faecal samples from 20 adult sheep (when possible) were collected, before (D0) and after (D14) an anthelmintic treatment with albendazole. For each farm and at each time point (D0 and D14) the faecal samples were examined individually and as pools. Specifically, three different pool sizes (5, 10 and 20 individual sheep samples) and three different analytic sensitivities (namely 10 using Mini-FLOTAC; 15 and 50 using the two variants of McMaster - McM15 and McM50) were compared for FEC and FECR using individual and pooled faecal samples. GI strongyle intensity (eggs per gram of faeces - EPG) of pooled samples correlated positively with mean EPG of individual samples, with very high correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.94 to 0.99) across the 3 different pool sizes and analytic sensitivities. Mini-FLOTAC was more sensitive compared to the two variants of McMaster (McM15 and McM50) for the diagnosis of GI strongyles in sheep (100% vs 88.5% vs 75.9%) and resulted in significant higher FEC compared to both McM15 and McM50, with a mean difference in egg counts of approximately 90 EPG (p<0.001). The drug efficacy results showed that FECR was higher than 98% at most farms independently of the pool size and analytic sensitivity. With the exception of two farms, FECR was 100% when calculated for individual animals and across the different pool size and analytic sensitivities. In conclusion, the present study highlighted that pooling ovine faecal samples is a rapid procedure that holds promise as a valid strategy for assessing GI strongyles FEC and FECR in sheep.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthelmintic drug efficacy; Faecal egg count; Gastrointestinal strongyles; McMaster; Mini-FLOTAC; Pooling faecal samples; Sheep

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002307     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  17 in total

1.  The Mini-FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of helminth and protozoan infections in humans and animals.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cringoli; Maria P Maurelli; Bruno Levecke; Antonio Bosco; Jozef Vercruysse; Jürg Utzinger; Laura Rinaldi
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  A Comparative Study of Mini-FLOTAC With Traditional Coprological Techniques in the Analysis of Cetacean Fecal Samples.

Authors:  Federica Marcer; Rudi Cassini; Nancy Parisotto; Cinzia Tessarin; Erica Marchiori
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Effectiveness of Anthelmintic Treatments in Small Ruminants in Germany.

Authors:  Katja Voigt; Maximilian Geiger; Miriam Carmen Jäger; Gabriela Knubben-Schweizer; Christina Strube; Yury Zablotski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Gastrointestinal parasitic infections in Indian Gaddi (goat) breed bucks: clinical, hemato-biochemical, parasitological and chemotherapeutic studies.

Authors:  Aman Dev Moudgil; Ankur Sharma; Madan Singh Verma; Ravindra Kumar; Pradeep Kumar Dogra; Pallavi Moudgil
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2017-06-26

5.  Comparison of individual and pooled stool samples for the assessment of intensity of Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth infections using the Kato-Katz technique.

Authors:  Ashenafi Kure; Zeleke Mekonnen; Daniel Dana; Mitiku Bajiro; Mio Ayana; Jozef Vercruysse; Bruno Levecke
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods.

Authors:  Antonio Bosco; Maria Paola Maurelli; Davide Ianniello; Maria Elena Morgoglione; Alessandra Amadesi; Gerald C Coles; Giuseppe Cringoli; Laura Rinaldi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep.

Authors:  Susan E Richmond; Francoise Wemelsfelder; Ina Beltran de Heredia; Roberto Ruiz; Elisabetta Canali; Cathy M Dwyer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-11

8.  Evaluation of a Urine Pooling Strategy for the Rapid and Cost-Efficient Prevalence Classification of Schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Nathan C Lo; Jean T Coulibaly; Eran Bendavid; Eliézer K N'Goran; Jürg Utzinger; Jennifer Keiser; Isaac I Bogoch; Jason R Andrews
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-08-09

9.  Control of Nematodirus spp. infection by sheep flock owners in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Connor McMahon; Hillary W J Edgar; Jason P Barley; Robert E B Hanna; Gerard P Brennan; Ian Fairweather
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.146

10.  Cattle gastrointestinal nematode egg-spiked faecal samples: high recovery rates using the Mini-FLOTAC technique.

Authors:  Alessandra Amadesi; Antonio Bosco; Laura Rinaldi; Giuseppe Cringoli; Edwin Claerebout; Maria Paola Maurelli
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.