Literature DB >> 29302848

Robot-assisted surgery and incisional hernia: a comparative study of ergonomics in a training model.

Alexis Sánchez1,2, Omaira Rodríguez3,4, Génesis Jara5, Renata Sánchez3,4, Liumariel Vegas3, José Rosciano5, Luis Estrada5.   

Abstract

Over the years, incisional hernia repair has evolved. Currently, primary closure of the defect before placing the mesh is a critical step in incisional hernia repair and minimally invasive surgery incorporation has an important role due to great advantages. Despite its benefits, laparoscopic closure with suture intracorporeal knotting is physically demanding and technically complex. Robotic technology provides an optimal three-dimensional view, maneuverability of the instruments but no study has assessed the impact of the DaVinci system in the ergonomics which is the objective in this study. Fourteen surgeons were able to achieve surgical repair of a defect in an incisional hernia inanimate model. The task was performed with conventional laparoscopy and robotic assistance. The mental effort was registered and physical disturbances were measured with the Local Experienced Discomfort scale. The subjects expressed discomfort mainly in the dominant side (p = 0.006). In the comparative analysis between the two approaches, upper limb less disturbance (p = 0.04) and lower mental effort (p = 0.001) were reported with robotic approach. Robotic assistance decreases mental and physical effort during the primary closure of a defect in an incisional hernia inanimate model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomics; Incisional hernia; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29302848     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0777-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  17 in total

1.  The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee; Tameka Clanton; Tamera Clanton; Erica Sutton; Adrian E Park; Michael R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology.

Authors:  Anthony Michael Gonzalez; Rey Jesus Romero; Rupa Seetharamaiah; Michelle Gallas; Julie Lamoureux; Jorge Rafael Rabaza
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 4.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  D Lomanto; S G Iyer; A Shabbir; W-K Cheah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J J Gonzalez; J L Glass; A Manjarrez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

Authors:  J M McGreevy; P P Goodney; C M Birkmeyer; S R G Finlayson; W S Laycock; J D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R H van der Schatte Olivier; C D P Van't Hullenaar; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparocopic ventral hernia repair with primary transparietal closure of the hernial defect.

Authors:  Roberto Rea; Paolo Falco; Domenico Izzo; Maddalena Leongito; Bruno Amato
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Feasibility and acceptance of a robotic surgery ergonomic training program.

Authors:  Jason Franasiak; Renatta Craven; Prithima Mosaly; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  5 in total

1.  Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; K K Jensen; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Chun-Kai Huang; Robin High; Melissa Leon; Ka-Chun Siu; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic Incisional Hernia Repair After Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): A 3-port Approach.

Authors:  Hsien-Che Ou; Li-Hua Huang; Kuang-Hsi Chang; Yen-Chuan Ou; Min-Che Tung; Wei-Chun Weng; Chao-Yu Hsu; Yi-Sheng Lin; Chin-Heng Lu; Tang-Yi Tsao
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.

Authors:  F J Voskens; E M van der Schans; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Abdul Shugaba; Joel E Lambert; Theodoros M Bampouras; Helen E Nuttall; Christopher J Gaffney; Daren A Subar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.