Literature DB >> 11443477

The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload.

R Berguer1, D L Forkey, W D Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery may be kinder to the patient, but it is more demanding on the surgeon. Fixed trocar positions often require the surgeon to work with instruments at awkward angles to their body. We studied the effect of horizontal and vertical laparoscopic instrument working angle on the surgeon's thumb, forearm, and shoulder muscle work.
METHODS: Electronyographic (EMG) signals were collected from the thenar compartment (TH), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), and deltoid (DEL) muscles of the dominant arm of eighth surgeons while they were closing a standard pistol-grip disposable laparoscopic grasper against a fixed resistance of 3 N. With the aid of a special testing bench, the instruments' position was randomly changed among 15 degrees, 45 degrees, and 75 degrees of horizontal angulation relative to the surgeons' sagital plane, and 15 degrees, 45 degrees, and 75 degrees degrees of vertical angulation relative to a horizontal plane. EMG signals were rectified and smoothed using analogue circuitry and digitally sampled at l0 Hz using a National Instruments DAQCard-700 connected to a Macintosh PowerBook 5300c running LabVIEW software. Statistical analysis was carried out by analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: The effects of vertical and horizontal working angles on the muscle effort were as follows: TH (horizontal, N.S.; vertical, N.S.), FDS (horizontal, p 45 degrees to the surgeon's sagital plane significantly increases the workload of the flexor digitorium superficialis and deltoid muscles. The deltoid muscle is also adversely affected by vertical angulation of the instrument. The instrument working angle has no effect on the thenar muscles. Whenever possible, laparoscopic surgeons should strive to place their instruments and trocars so as to minimize extreme horizontal or vertical displacement of their hands away from a resting position of comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443477     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-0019-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Ergonomic hand tool design.

Authors:  S L Johnson
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 4.  Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection.

Authors:  M Patkin; L Isabel
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1995-04
  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  [Sacropolpopexy - pro robotic].

Authors:  C Hampel; C Thomas; J W Thüroff; F Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S K Maithel; L Villegas; N Stylopoulos; S Dawson; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Authors:  J Heemskerk; R Zandbergen; J G Maessen; J W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Georg O Spaun; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Ergonomics of disposable handles for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  D Büchel; R Mårvik; B Hallabrin; U Matern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robot-assisted surgery and incisional hernia: a comparative study of ergonomics in a training model.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Omaira Rodríguez; Génesis Jara; Renata Sánchez; Liumariel Vegas; José Rosciano; Luis Estrada
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-01-04

7.  Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Avinash N Supe; Gaurav V Kulkarni; Pradnya A Supe
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Zehetner; A Kaltenbacher; W Wayand; A Shamiyeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R H van der Schatte Olivier; C D P Van't Hullenaar; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geertje Callewaert; Jan Bosteels; Susanne Housmans; Jasper Verguts; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Frank Van der Aa; Dirk De Ridder; Ignace Vergote; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2016-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.