Literature DB >> 29302490

A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery.

Ru Dee Chung1,2, David J Hunter-Smith1,2, Robert T Spychal1,2, Venkat V Ramakrishnan3, Warren Matthew Rozen1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Process mapping has been identified as a strategy to improve surgical efficiency but has been inconsistently applied in the literature and underutilised in surgical practice. In this journal, we recently described our utilisation of these approaches when applied to breast reconstruction. We showed that in surgery as complex as autologous breast reconstruction, process mapping can improve efficiency, and may improve surgical teaching, education and audit. The intraoperative period specifically is an area that can be applied not only to breast reconstruction, but to a much broader range of surgical procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase and PsychINFO. Manual searching of the references from articles identified was also conducted. Data items relating to the review aims were extracted from articles' methods, applications, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was carried out to synthesise the information on the current usage of process mapping in the intraoperative period. Seventeen of 1,488 studies were eligible for review, with all of non-randomised study design. Studies had overlap in components of the intraoperative period to which process mapping was applied. Common areas of improvement were identified. Outcome measures were assessed in ten studies that implemented interventions based on the improvement areas to increase surgical efficiency. As such, process mapping has been used as part of larger quality improvement methods, albeit with inconsistent nomenclature, to improve surgical efficiency. While it has been applied to a range of surgical specialties, there is a lack of application to the surgical component of the intraoperative period. Greater consistency in the reporting and description of process mapping will enable further research for evidence of its benefits.

Keywords:  Quality improvement (QI); efficiency; process assessment (Healthcare); process mapping; task performance and analysis; total quality management

Year:  2017        PMID: 29302490      PMCID: PMC5750301          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.11.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  29 in total

1.  Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction.

Authors:  Timothy M Trebble; Navjyot Hansi; Theresa Hydes; Melissa A Smith; Marc Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-13

2.  Endovascular aneurysm repair delivery redesign leads to quality improvement and cost reduction.

Authors:  Courtney J Warner; Alexander J Horvath; Richard J Powell; Jesse A Columbo; Teri R Walsh; Philip P Goodney; Daniel B Walsh; David H Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Improved Operating Room Efficiency via Constraint Management: Experience of a Tertiary-Care Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Charles W Kimbrough; Kelly M McMasters; Jeff Canary; Lisa Jackson; Ian Farah; Mark V Boswell; Daniel Kim; Charles R Scoggins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Time-driven activity-based costing: a driver for provider engagement in costing activities and redesign initiatives.

Authors:  Nancy McLaughlin; Michael A Burke; Nisheeta P Setlur; Douglas R Niedzwiecki; Alan L Kaplan; Christopher Saigal; Aman Mahajan; Neil A Martin; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Detecting performance variance in complex surgical procedures: analysis of a step-wise technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Juan P Toro; Ankit D Patel; Nathaniel W Lytle; John F Sweeney; Rachel L Medbery; Steven Scott Davis; Edward Lin; Juan M Sarmiento
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Elimination of waste: creation of a successful Lean colonoscopy program at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Aneel Damle; Nathan Andrew; Shubjeet Kaur; Alan Orquiola; Karim Alavi; Scott R Steele; Justin Maykel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Lean processes for optimizing OR capacity utilization: prospective analysis before and after implementation of value stream mapping (VSM).

Authors:  Patric Schwarz; Klaus Dieter Pannes; Michel Nathan; Hans Jorg Reimer; Axel Kleespies; Nicole Kuhn; Anne Rupp; Nikolaus Peter Zügel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice.

Authors:  Bernard T Lee; Adam M Tobias; Janet H Yueh; Eran D Bar-Meir; Lynn M Darrah; Charlotte L Guglielmi; Elizabeth R Wood; Justine M Carr; Donald W Moorman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  A "time-and-motion" study of endoscopic practice: strategies to enhance efficiency.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Kristia Chrysostomou; Naila Himy; Wai Ling Leong
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the functionality of an emergency obstetric referral system and continuum of care among public healthcare facilities in a low resource setting: an application of process mapping approach.

Authors:  Bernice Ofosu; Dan Ofori; Michael Ntumy; Kwaku Asah-Opoku; Theodore Boafor
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.