Literature DB >> 25682098

Detecting performance variance in complex surgical procedures: analysis of a step-wise technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

Juan P Toro1, Ankit D Patel1, Nathaniel W Lytle1, John F Sweeney1, Rachel L Medbery1, Steven Scott Davis1, Edward Lin1, Juan M Sarmiento2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) is a technically challenging operation. Our aim is to evaluate a standardized technique of LRH and determine variances in performance.
METHODS: The procedure was deconstructed into 7 major step-wise components. All LRH followed the same surgical sequence, and used the same devices and operating room set-up. Thirty randomly selected video recordings of the procedure underwent intraoperative time analysis. The variances measured by standard deviation of each step were calculated (mean in minutes ± standard deviation).
RESULTS: Mean total operative time was 114 ± 25 min. The steps with the least variance were inferior vena cava dissection (8 ± 3) and right hepatic vein ligation (9 ± 5). The longest and also the step with the greatest variance was parenchymal transection (35 ± 12).
CONCLUSIONS: LRH can be performed consistently using a standardized step-wise technique. Parenchymal transection had most variation, and this could be explained by intrinsic liver factors. Surgical performance improvement should begin with deconstructing the operation into definable steps to identify areas for change.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Laparoscopic right hepatectomy; Manufacturing productivity tools; Step-wise technique; Variance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25682098     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery.

Authors:  Ru Dee Chung; David J Hunter-Smith; Robert T Spychal; Venkat V Ramakrishnan; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

2.  Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies.

Authors:  Zi-Yu Wang; Qing-Lian Chen; Ling-Ling Sun; Shu-Ping He; Xiao-Fen Luo; Li-Shuang Huang; Jun-Hai Huang; Cheng-Ming Xiong; Chong Zhong
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Comprehensive evaluation of liver resection procedures: surgical mind development through cognitive task analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Maw Ho; Go Wakabayashi; Chi-Chuan Yeh; Rey-Heng Hu; Takanori Sakaguchi; Yasushi Hasegawa; Takeshi Takahara; Hiroyuki Nitta; Akira Sasaki; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-26

4.  A Step-Wise Approach to Total Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction: How and Why We Do It.

Authors:  Hylke J F Brenkman; Juan Correa-Cote; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.