Literature DB >> 27089207

Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke.

Claire Allman1, Ugwechi Amadi1, Anderson M Winkler1, Leigh Wilkins1, Nicola Filippini1, Udo Kischka2, Charlotte J Stagg1, Heidi Johansen-Berg3.   

Abstract

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can boost the effects of motor training and facilitate plasticity in the healthy human brain. Motor rehabilitation depends on learning and plasticity, and motor learning can occur after stroke. We tested whether brain stimulation using anodal tDCS added to motor training could improve rehabilitation outcomes in patients after stroke. We performed a randomized, controlled trial in 24 patients at least 6 months after a first unilateral stroke not directly involving the primary motor cortex. Patients received either anodal tDCS (n= 11) or sham treatment (n= 13) paired with daily motor training for 9 days. We observed improvements that persisted for at least 3 months post-intervention after anodal tDCS compared to sham treatment on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) but not on the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed increased activity during movement of the affected hand in the ipsilesional motor and premotor cortex in the anodal tDCS group compared to the sham treatment group. Structural MRI revealed intervention-related increases in gray matter volume in cortical areas, including ipsilesional motor and premotor cortex after anodal tDCS but not sham treatment. The addition of ipsilesional anodal tDCS to a 9-day motor training program improved long-term clinical outcomes relative to sham treatment in patients after stroke.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27089207      PMCID: PMC5388180          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  46 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Sunderland; D J Tinson; E L Bradley; D Fletcher; R Langton Hewer; D T Wade
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Margaret Shuster; Erin O'Hara; Kevin Hurley; Dionne Middlebrooks; Karen Guilkey
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning.

Authors:  C J Stagg; G Jayaram; D Pastor; Z T Kincses; P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Charlotte Jane Stagg; Velicia Bachtiar; Jacinta O'Shea; Claire Allman; Rosemary Ann Bosnell; Udo Kischka; Paul McMahan Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg; H Reddy
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.406

View more
  56 in total

1.  Personalized upper limb training combined with anodal-tDCS for sensorimotor recovery in spastic hemiparesis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Melanie C Baniña; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo; Sigal Berman; Nachum Soroker; John M Solomon; Dario G Liebermann
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates GABA Levels Beyond the Stimulated Region: Perspectives for Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Kenji Taneda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Functional relevance of stroke-related losses in GABAB -mediated interhemispheric inhibition for alternative modes of stroke recovery.

Authors:  Justin W Andrushko; Dakota T Zirk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  [Brain stimulation for treating stroke-related motor deficits].

Authors:  Caroline Tscherpel; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on neural processing in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Robert Darkow; Andrew Martin; Anna Würtz; Agnes Flöel; Marcus Meinzer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Holly Calhoun; Stacey Rimikis; Mara Steinberg Lowe; Rebecca Wellner; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Authors:  Ainslie Johnstone; Jacob M Levenstein; Emily L Hinson; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Discernible effects of tDCS over the primary motor and posterior parietal cortex on different stages of motor learning.

Authors:  Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina; Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Effects of chronic antidepressant use on neurophysiological responses to tDCS post-stroke.

Authors:  Xin Li; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.