New Alkaloid and Aromatic Glucoside from the Flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green.

In this paper, we investigated the chemical components of the flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green for the first time. In the whole post-fertilization, a new alkaloid, named Lunagrad A (1), and a new aromatic glucoside, named Lunagrad B (2), were isolated from the MeOH extract of the flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green, along with other six known aromatic compounds (3-8) and three flavone glucosides (9-11). These structures were determined on the basis of NMR experiments, as well as chemical evidence.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, numerous orchid species have been used in different countries for apparent ornamental and medicinal value. Cymbidium hybridum is one of the most popular pot orchids worldwide, which contains a huge number of cultivars with large flowers. Commercial Cymbidium hybridum includes some wild species in genus of Cymbidium and lots of hybrid cultivars through inter-specific hybridization between 20 Cymbidium species of terrestrial and epiphytic orchids. The natural parent species of Cymbidium hybridum could trace back to its primal putative parents Cymbidium eburneum (maternal parent) and Cymbidium lowianum (paternal parent) in 1889 [1,2,3]. However, very little is known about the chemical or bioactive substances of these cultivars. To the best of our knowledge, only one Cymbidium hybridum, Cymbidium Great Flower Marylaurencin, has been chemically investigated, leading to the identification of phenanthrene derivatives and aromatic constituents, which showed certain biological activities [4,5,6,7].

In this paper, we investigated the chemical components of the flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green for the first time. In the whole post-fertilization, a new alkaloid, named Lunagrad A (1), and a new aromatic glucoside, named Lunagrad B (2), were isolated (Figure 1). We describe here the isolation, purification, and structural elucidation of 1 and 2, primarily determined by extensive NMR experiments.

Figure 1

Two new compounds 1 and 2 isolated from the flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green.

In addition, six known aromatic compounds (2R)-2-benzyl-2-hydroxysuccinic acid (3) [8], marylaurecinosides B (4) [5], grammatophylloside B (5) [9], gastrodin (6) [10], arbutin (7) [11], and sakakin (8) [12], together with three flavone glucosides, ermanin (9) [13], quercetin 3-O-α-(2″-O-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (10) [14], and orientin (11) [15] were found. The known structures (Figure 2) were identified by comparison of their spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature. It is noteworthy that compounds 3–8 were also obtained from the flowers of Cymbidium Great Flower Marylaurencin [7].

Figure 2

Nine known compounds 3–11 isolated from the flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green.

2. Results and Discussion

Lunagrad A (1) was identified as a bisbenzyltetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid (BBIQA) derivative. The BBIQAs represent a large and important class of natural products, which have received great attention due to their wide range of pharmacological activities [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Compound 1 was obtained as a slightly yellow amorphous powder and showed an [M + H]+ ion peak at m/z = 641.3230 (calcd. 641.3227) in the HR-MS (ESI), which corresponded to the molecular formula C38H44N2O7. 13C-NMR, edited HSQC, and HMBC spectra (Supplementary Information Figures S3–S8) of compound 1 displayed 38 carbon resonances, assignable to ten aromatic tertiary carbons (δC 107.3, 113.2, 113.7, 116.7, 121.4, 122.8, 122.9, 124.4, 131.8, 133.9), 14 aromatic quaternary carbons (δC 124.0, 129.0, 129.1, 129.3, 135.8, 136.7, 139.3, 153.0, 149.4, 148.7, 151.0, 150.3, 145.2, 155.1), two aliphatic methines (δC 63.0, 64.5), six aliphatic methylenes (δC 23.7, 26.0, 37.5, 42.6, 45.3, 45.7), two NCH3 (δC 42.5, 43.1), and four OCH3 groups (δC 56.1, 56.4, 56.8, 60.7) that are connected to aromatic rings. The NMR data featured a 1,4,5-trisubstituted benzene moiety [δH 6.56 (s) H-13; δ 6.92, 6.86 (2H, both d, J = 8.2 Hz) H-16, H-17], and a 1,4-disubstituted benzene moiety [δH 7.43, 7.05 (2H, both d, J = 8.2 Hz) H-13′, H-14′; δH 6.76, 6.38 (2H, both d, J = 8.2 Hz) H-16′, H-17′], together with three aromatic proton singlets (δH 6.42, H-6; δ 6.66, H-6′; δ 6.01, H-9′) [21]. The NMR spectrum of compound 1 exhibited two N-methyl signals [δH 2.27, 2.62 (s) H-2, H-2′] and four O-methyl signals [δH 3.15, 3.37, 3.73, 3.89 (s) CH3O-8, CH3O-7′, CH3O-7, CH3O-15] (Supplementary Information Figure S2). Furthermore, compound 1 is an isomer of well-known dauricine’s analogues [18,19,20]. The structure of dauricine was established as a head-to-tail BBIQA by spectroscopic data [21]. However, the HMBC spectrum of 1 showed the expected C−H correlations via two and three bonds within the two tetrahydroisoquinoline units, but gave no additional information about the connectivity of the two moieties (head-to-tail, tail-to-tail, or head to head; no correlations via four bonds were observed; SI Figure S9). In addition, H-11/11′ correlated with the aromatic carbons C-10/10′, C13/13′ and C17/17′ (Supplementary Information Figure S9). Analysis of the ROESY spectrum suggested the methoxy position to aromatic rings [correlations between H-6, CH3O-7, and H-6′, CH3O-7′, and H-16, CH3O-15, respectively; Supplementary Information Figure S10]. Collectively, these data indicate the structure of the new compound Lunagrad A (1) as shown in Figure 1.

Lunagrad B (2) was obtained as a white amorphous powder. The molecular formula, C25H32O13, which requires ten degrees of unsaturation, was determined on the basis of the [M + H]+ ion peak at m/z = 541.1917 (calcd. 541.1921) in the HR-MS (ESI) . The acid hydrolysis of 2 gave D-glucose, which was identified after derivatization by GC-MS. The β stereochemistry was determined by the coupling constants of the anomeric hydrogen (7.2 Hz). The 1H and 13C-NMR (CD3OD) spectra of 2 (Supplementary Information Figures S11 and S13), which were assigned by two-dimensional (2D) gradient NMR experiments (HSQC, HMBC, COSY) (Supplementary Information Figures S14–S17), showed benzyloxy protons [δ 4.54 (2H, s) H-1], and two A2B2 systems specific to a para-substituted aromatic pattern [δ 7.02, 7.27 (2H each, both d, J = 8.4 Hz) H-2′/6′, H-3′/5′; δ 6.69, 6.96 (2H each, both d, J = 8.8 Hz) H-2″/6″, H-3″/5″] (Supplementary Information Figure S14). In the HMBC experiment of 2, H-1 correlated with the aromatic C-1′ and C-2′/6′ (δC 136.6, 129.5). The chemically equivalent H-2′/6′ aromatic protons correlated with C-1 (δC 64.9), C-1′ (δC 136.6) and the oxygenated C-4′ (δC 158.5). In addition, the chemically equivalent H-2″/6″ aromatic protons correlated with the oxygenated C-1″/4″ (δC 152.5, 153.9) (Supplementary Information Figure S16). The HSQC spectrum clearly showed two glucopyranosyl pattern and two correlation between the anomeric proton (δ 4.73) [(2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), H-4′-O-Glu-1 and H-4″-O-Glu-1] and the anomeric carbons (δC 102.4, 103.7) (Supplementary Information Figure S15). On the basis of these findings, the structure of the new compound Lunagrad B (2) was formulated as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

Key COSY (thick lines), HMBC (H➞C) and ROESY (↔) correlations of 1 and 2.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General

GC-MS and EIMS, Trace GS Ultra equipped with a capillary TR-5MS SQC column (0.25 μm, 15 m × 0.25 mm i.d.) and DSQII Thermo Scientific mass spectrometer. High resolution mass spectra were measured at Keecloud Mass Spectrometry Service Company on a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL system. Optical rotations were measured on a JASCO-1020 polarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). Infrared spectra were collected on a Bruker model TENSOR27 spectrophotometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). All of the NMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker AVANCE III 500 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany). Sephadex LH-20 (25–100 μm, Pharmacia Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Uppsala, Sweden), D101/D201 macroporous adsorption resin (Dalian Elite Analytical Instrument Co. Ltd., Dalian, China), MCI GEL CHP20P (Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan), C18 reversed-phase silica gel (230–400 mesh, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Silica gel (200–300 mesh), and Silica gel H (Qingdao Oceanic Chemical Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) were used for column chromatography. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on glass-backed plates coated with 0.25 mm layers of Silica gel H (Qingdao Oceanic Chemical Co., Qingdao, China). Fractions were monitored by TLC and spots were visualized by heating silica gel plates sprayed with 5% H2SO4 in EtOH/H2O (1/1). All of the solvents and chemicals that were used were of analytical reagent grade (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and water was doubly distilled before use.

3.2. Plant Material

Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green was purchased from Fujian Flower Market, Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China, in September 2012 and identified by Prof. Shi-Pin Chen, Forestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. A voucher specimen (No. 070612) was deposited in the Forestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The flower organs of the plant (air-dried, 36 g) were extracted with MeOH (2 L, 3 d) at room temperature for three times and the combined organic phase was concentrated in vacuum via a rotavap. The residue was subjected to D101 macroporous adsorption resin and then filtered to give 9 g of crude extract. The extract was subjected to D201 macroporous adsorption resin with a H2O/MeOH elution gradient (from 100% H2O to 100% MeOH) to yield 10 fractions (Fractions 1–10).

Fraction 2 (608 mg) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (CHCl3/MeOH, 20:1) to give 10 (18.7 mg, Rf = 0.20, CHCl3/MeOH = 10:1).

Fraction 3 (1.30 g) was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography eluted with MeOH to afford four fractions 3-1–3-4. Fraction 3-1 was further purified by RPC column chromatography (MeOH/H2O, 1:1) to afford 1 (60.7 mg). Fraction 3-3 was purified by MCI column chromatography (MeOH/H2O, 3:5 to 1:0) to afford 6 (20.3 mg). Fraction 3-4 was obtained as white powder (2, 26.4 mg). A solution of 2 in 2M hdrochloric acid (0.5 mL) was heated to reflux for 3 h. The solution was extracted with t-butyl alcohol. The dried residue of the aqueous layer was derivatized by pyridine and 1-(trimethylsilyl)-imidazole at 60 °C for 1 h. The mixture was analyzed by GC-MS (Trace GS Ultra) with a capillary TR-5MS SQC column (0.25 μm, 15 cm × 0.25 mm) under the following conditions: 1 min at 40 °C, increase of temperature with a thermal ramp of 10 °C/min until 250 °C (helium flow rate 1 mL/min, injector temperature 250 °C, transfer temperature 285 °C). Impact electronic detection was performed with a DSQII Thermo Scientific mass spectrometer. Identification of d-glucose was carried out by a comparison of its retention time and spectroscopic data with those of an authentic sample of d-glucose (Purchased from Aldrich), tR 14.8 min.

Fraction 4 (1.50 g) was subjected to D201 macroporous adsorption resin with a H2O/MeOH elution gradient (H2O/MeOH, 9:1 to 1:4) to yield 6 fractions 4-1–4-6. Fraction 4-3 was obtained as white powder (5, 39.2 mg). Fraction 4-4 was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetone, 10:1 to 1:1) to yield 4 (23.2 mg, Rf = 0.26, CHCl3/MeOH = 10:1) and 9 (30.1 mg). Fraction 4-5 was purified by MCI column chromatography eluting with MeOH to afford 8 (12.6 mg).

Fraction 7 (1.20 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (CHCl3/MeOH, 30:1 to 3:1) to yield 6 fractions 7-1–7-6. Fraction 7-2 was obtained as a white powder (3, 25.0 mg). Fraction 7-3 was purified by MCI column chromatography (H2O/MeOH, 2:3), to afford 7 (39.4 mg).

Fraction 8 (910 mg) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetone, 20:1 to 2:1) to yield 5 fractions 8-1–8-5. Fraction 8-5 was obtained as yellow powder (11, 19.6 mg).

3.4. Spectral Data

Lunagrad A (1). Slightly yellow, amorphous powder. [α] +11.4 (c 0.1, MeOH). IR (KBr) νmax 3420, 1617, 1509, 1463, 1270, 1222, 1169, 1125, 1076 cm−1. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated for C38H45N2O7 [M + H]+ 641.3227, found 641.3230. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) data (see Table 1).

Table 1

1H-NMR (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) data of compound 1 in CD3OD (δ, ppm; J, Hz) (Supplementary Information Figures S2 and S3).

No.		1H-NMR	13C-NMR	No.		1H-NMR	13C-NMR
1	CH	3.82, d, 10.0	63.0	1′	CH	4.00, dd, 11.0, 6.0	64.5
2	CH3	2.27, s	43.1	2′	CH3	2.62, s	42.5
3	CH2	3.49, overlap2.91, overlap	45.3	3′	CH2	3.47, m2.78, overlap	45.7
4	CH2	2.92, overlap2.53, dd, 14.5, 4.5	23.7	4′	CH2	3.01, m2.86, overlap	26.0
5	C	-	124.0	5′	C	-	129.1
6	CH	6.42, s	107.3	6′	CH	6.66, s	113.7
7	C	-	153.0	7′	C	-	150.3
7-OMe	CH3	3.73, s	56.4	7′-OMe	CH3	3.37, s	56.1
8	C	-	139.3	8′	C	-	145.2
8-OMe	CH3	3.15, s	60.7			-
9	C	-	149.4	9′	CH	6.01, s	121.4
10	C	-	129.3	10′	C	-	129.0
11	CH2	2.76, dd, 14.5, 10.02.46, d, 14.5	42.6	11′	CH2	3.27, dd, 12.5, 6.02.87, overlap	37.5
12	C	-	135.8	12′	C	-	136.7
13	CH	6.56, d, 1.6	116.7	13′	CH	7.43, d, 8.2	131.8
14	C	-	151.0	14′	CH	7.05, d, 8.2	122.9
15	C	-	148.7	15′	C	-	155.1
15-OMe	CH3	3.89, s	56.8	-	-	-	-
16	CH	6.92, d, 8.2	113.2	16′	CH	6.76, d, 8.2	122.8
17	CH	6.86, d, 8.2	124.4	17′	CH	6.38, d, 8.2	133.9

Lunagrad B (2). White, amorphous powder. [α] −37.8 (c 0.1, MeOH). IR (KBr) νmax 3230, 1610, 1450, 1221, 1188, 1095 cm−1. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated for C25H33O13 [M + H]+ 541.1921, found 541.1917. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) data (see Table 2).

Table 2

1H-NMR (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) data of compound 2 in CD3OD (δ, ppm; J, Hz) (Supplementary Information Figures S11 and S12).

No.		1H-NMR	13C-NMR	No.		1H-NMR	13C-NMR
1′	C	-	136.6	1″	C	-	153.9
2′, 6′	CH	7.27, d, 8.4	129.5	2″, 6″	CH	6.69, d, 8.8	116.6
3′, 5′	CH	7.07, d, 8.4	117.7	3″, 5″	CH	6.96, d, 8.8	119.4
4′	C	-	158.5	4″	C	-	152.5
4′-O-Glu-1	CH	4.89, d, 7.2	102.4	4″-O-Glu-1	CH	4.73, d, 7.2	103.7
4′-O-Glu-2	CH	3.42, overlap	75.1	4″-O-Glu-2	CH	3.42, overlap	75.0
4′-O-Glu-3	CH	3.41, overlap	78.2	4″-O-Glu-3	CH	3.41, overlap	78.0
4′-O-Glu-4	CH	3.34, overlap	71.5	4″-O-Glu-4	CH	3.34, overlap	71.4
4′-O-Glu-5	CH	3.36, overlap	78.1	4″-O-Glu-5	CH	3.36, overlap	78.0
4′-O-Glu-6	CH2	3.88, br.d, 12.03.69, br.d, 12.0	62.6	4″-O-Glu-6	CH2	3.88, br.d, 12.03.69, br.d, 12.0	62.5
1	CH2	4.54, s	64.9	-	-	-	-

4. Conclusions

The first chemical investigation of the flowers of Cymbidium Lunagrad Eternal Green resulted in the isolation of a new alkaloid, named Lunagrad A (1), and a new aromatic glucoside, named Lunagrad B (2), together with nine known compounds, 3–11. These specific compounds provided further confirmation of the typical profile of secondary metabolites that are found in the orchid family, and might be useful for further biological studies.