| Literature DB >> 29301286 |
Zirong Ye1,2, Li Xu3, Zi Zhou4,5, Yafei Wu6,7, Ya Fang8,9.
Abstract
Most previous research on the disparities of hypertension risk has neither simultaneously explored the spatio-temporal disparities nor considered the spatial information contained in the samples, thus the estimated results may be unreliable. Our study was based on the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), including residents over 12 years old in seven provinces from 1991 to 2011. Bayesian B-spline was used in the extended shared component model (SCM) for fitting temporal-related variation to explore spatio-temporal distribution in the odds ratio (OR) of hypertension, reveal gender variation, and explore latent risk factors. Our results revealed that the prevalence of hypertension increased from 14.09% in 1991 to 32.37% in 2011, with men experiencing a more obvious change than women. From a spatial perspective, a standardized prevalence ratio (SPR) remaining at a high level was found in Henan and Shandong for both men and women. Meanwhile, before 1997, the temporal distribution of hypertension risk for both men and women remained low. After that, notably since 2004, the OR of hypertension in each province increased to a relatively high level, especially in Northern China. Notably, the OR of hypertension in Shandong and Jiangsu, which was over 1.2, continuously stood out after 2004 for males, while that in Shandong and Guangxi was relatively high for females. The findings suggested that obvious spatial-temporal patterns for hypertension exist in the regions under research and this pattern was quite different between men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian B-spline; Shared Components Model (SCM); disease mapping; hypertension; spatial analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29301286 PMCID: PMC5800154 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Maps of standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) for male and female in each period.
The seven constructed models.
| Model No. | Characteristic |
|---|---|
| 1 | Knot at 1997, with |
| 2 | Knot at 1997, without |
| 3 | Knots at 2000, with |
| 4 | Knots at 2000, without |
| 5 | Knots at 1997 and 2000, without |
| 6 | Knots at 1997 and 2004, without |
| 7 | Knots at 1997, 2000 and 2004, without |
Trends in prevalence of hypertension among the participants (%).
| Province | Variable | 1991 | 1993 | 1997 | 2000 | 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu | Number | 1255 | 1213 | 1443 | 1277 | 1186 | 1131 | 1255 | 1178 |
| Cases | 134 | 164 | 530 | 302 | 350 | 426 | 491 | 435 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 10.68 | 13.52 | 36.73 | 23.65 | 29.51 | 37.67 | 39.12 | 36.93 | |
| Shandong | Number | 1195 | 1092 | 1380 | 1146 | 1111 | 1131 | 1142 | 1084 |
| Cases | 249 | 234 | 532 | 345 | 361 | 336 | 377 | 388 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 20.84 | 21.43 | 38.55 | 30.10 | 32.49 | 29.71 | 33.01 | 35.79 | |
| Henan | Number | 1124 | 1036 | 1498 | 1127 | 1338 | 1191 | 1239 | 1183 |
| Cases | 166 | 192 | 599 | 303 | 564 | 500 | 489 | 488 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 14.77 | 18.53 | 39.99 | 26.89 | 42.15 | 41.98 | 39.47 | 41.25 | |
| Hubei | Number | 1269 | 1191 | 1513 | 1167 | 1146 | 1049 | 1068 | 1015 |
| Cases | 188 | 229 | 555 | 231 | 347 | 375 | 377 | 356 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 14.81 | 19.23 | 36.68 | 19.79 | 30.28 | 35.75 | 35.30 | 35.07 | |
| Hunan | Number | 1259 | 1211 | 1405 | 1184 | 1142 | 1224 | 1196 | 1131 |
| Cases | 193 | 155 | 443 | 290 | 265 | 242 | 341 | 317 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 15.33 | 12.80 | 31.53 | 24.49 | 23.20 | 19.77 | 28.51 | 28.03 | |
| Guangxi | Number | 1362 | 1359 | 1688 | 1264 | 1356 | 1316 | 1443 | 1431 |
| Cases | 172 | 173 | 619 | 201 | 353 | 293 | 471 | 380 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 12.63 | 12.73 | 36.67 | 15.90 | 26.03 | 22.26 | 32.64 | 26.55 | |
| Guizhou | Number | 1549 | 1367 | 1687 | 1299 | 1216 | 1181 | 1138 | 1079 |
| Cases | 168 | 180 | 424 | 204 | 232 | 223 | 315 | 258 | |
| Prevalence (%) | 10.85 | 13.17 | 25.13 | 15.70 | 19.08 | 18.88 | 27.68 | 23.91 |
Age distribution of the participants.
| Gender | Variable | Value | 1991 | 1993 | 1997 | 2000 | 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Age | 12–29 | 40.30 | 37.97 | 37.87 | 30.39 | 23.46 | 17.97 | 17.14 | 15.60 |
| 30–44 | 27.84 | 28.39 | 27.17 | 26.59 | 25.55 | 27.59 | 25.50 | 22.45 | ||
| 45–59 | 19.01 | 19.71 | 21.15 | 26.37 | 30.59 | 31.04 | 31.71 | 32.59 | ||
| 60–100 | 12.86 | 13.92 | 13.80 | 16.65 | 20.40 | 23.40 | 25.65 | 29.35 | ||
| Female | Age | 12–29 | 39.31 | 35.13 | 34.33 | 26.16 | 19.43 | 15.59 | 15.46 | 14.22 |
| 30–44 | 28.82 | 30.84 | 28.38 | 28.55 | 27.11 | 28.87 | 25.36 | 23.04 | ||
| 45–59 | 18.39 | 19.91 | 20.88 | 26.51 | 31.02 | 30.49 | 31.86 | 32.70 | ||
| 60–100 | 13.48 | 14.12 | 16.41 | 18.78 | 22.43 | 25.05 | 27.32 | 30.04 |
Figure 2Prevalence of hypertension during eight waves of surveys from 1991 to 2011.
Global cluster for prevalence of hypertension during eight waves of surveys.
| Year | Moran’s | |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | –0.0911 | 0.037 |
| 1993 | 0.5002 | 0.042 |
| 1997 | 0.0344 | 0.227 |
| 2000 | 0.1270 | 0.216 |
| 2004 | 0.3986 | 0.044 |
| 2006 | 0.4739 | 0.047 |
| 2009 | 0.0616 | 0.269 |
| 2011 | 0.6925 | 0.012 |
Result of the models including Dbar, pD, deviance information criterion (DIC).
| Model | Dbar | pD | DIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1569.0 | 11.82 | 1581.0 |
| 2 | 133.7.0 | 24.9 | 412.2 |
| 3 | 1342.0 | 14.2 | 1356.0 |
| 4 | 1323.0 | 25.0 | 1348.0 |
| 5 | 1105.0 | 25.0 | 1130.0 |
| 6 | 1263.0 | 25.2 | 1288.0 |
| 7 | 1338.0 | 19.6 | 1357.0 |
Figure 3Maps of the odds ratio (OR) for shared component model (SCM) in each period.
Figure 4Maps of the exp(b) for shared component model (SCM).
Figure 5Weights δ of SCM during eight waves surveys (from 1991 to 2011).
Figure 6Convergence of δ.
Sensitivity analysis with respect to different priors for the precision parameters.
| Parameter | Priors 1 | Priors 2 | Priors 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | |
| Exp( | |||
| Males | 0.340 (0.312–0.370) | 0.340 (0.312–0.369) | 0.340 (0.312–0.369) |
| Females | 0.948 (0.891–1.007) | 0.949 (0.892–1.009) | 0.949 (0.892–1.009) |
| 0.161 (0.141–0.182) | 0.162 (0.141–0.184) | 0.162 (0.143–0.182) | |
| OR | |||
| Males | 0.841 (0.834–0.849) | 0.841 (0.834–0.849) | 0.841 (0.834–0.849) |
| Females | 0.175 (0.153–0.196) | 0.166 (0.153–0.197) | 0.166 (0.153–0.197) |
| DIC(pD) | DIC = 1105 (pD = 25.0) | DIC = 1106 (pD = 26.2) | DIC = 1108 (pD = 26.1) |
For brevity, this table mainly presented results of sensitivity for δ when t = 1 and OR when t = 1 and region i = 1, results of other δ and OR can be obtained upon request.