| Literature DB >> 27104551 |
Qingyun Du1,2,3,4, Mingxiao Zhang5, Yayan Li6, Hui Luan7, Shi Liang8, Fu Ren9,10,11.
Abstract
Incorporating the information of hypertension, this paper applies Bayesian multi-disease analysis to model the spatial patterns of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) risks. Patterns of harmful alcohol intake (HAI) and overweight/obesity are also modelled as they are common risk factors contributing to both IHD and hypertension. The hospitalization data of IHD and hypertension in 2012 were analyzed with three Bayesian multi-disease models at the sub-district level of Shenzhen. Results revealed that the IHD high-risk cluster shifted slightly north-eastward compared with the IHD Standardized Hospitalization Ratio (SHR). Spatial variations of overweight/obesity and HAI were found to contribute most to the IHD patterns. Identified patterns of IHD risk would benefit IHD integrated prevention. Spatial patterns of overweight/obesity and HAI could supplement the current disease surveillance system by providing information about small-area level risk factors, and thus benefit integrated prevention of related chronic diseases. Middle southern Shenzhen, where high risk of IHD, overweight/obesity, and HAI are present, should be prioritized for interventions, including alcohol control, innovative healthy diet toolkit distribution, insurance system revision, and community-based chronic disease intervention. Related health resource planning is also suggested to focus on these areas first.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian hierarchical model; Shenzhen; hypertension; ischemic heart disease (IHD); multi-disease analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27104551 PMCID: PMC4847098 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13040436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The city of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Figure 2Sub-districts (Jie Dao) of Shenzhen.
Figure 3Spatial patterns of standardized hospitalization ratios (SHRs) of (a) Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD); (b) hypertension in 2012 for Shenzhen at the sub-district level.
Figure 4Results obtained using Model 1. Spatial patterns of posterior estimates of overall IHD relative risk (RR).
Figure 5Results obtained using Model 2. Spatial patterns of posterior estimates of (a) overall IHD relative risk (RR); (b) RR of IHD explained by hypertension; (c) overall hypertension RR.
Figure 6Results obtained using Model 3. Spatial patterns of posterior estimates of (a) overall IHD relative risk (RR); (b) overall hypertension RR; (c) shared component (with coefficients) of IHD; and (d) shared component of hypertension RRs.
Variances in log-form relative risks of IHD and hypertension; ratios of components in relative risks; and Deviance Information Criterion (DICs) of models.
| Model | Disease | Parameter/Component | Median CI (5%, 95%) of Variances | Median CI (5%, 95%) of Component Ratio | DIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IHD | 0.789 (0.517, 1.046) | - | 530.2 | |
| 0.708 (−6.318, 4.480) | 85.5% (75.0%, 85.6%) | ||||
| 2 | IHD | 1.494 (0.790, 2.502) | - | 488.6 | |
| 0.014 (−0.130, 0.132) | 72.5% (41.6%, 80.2%) | ||||
| 3 | IHD | 1.145 (0.873, 1.494) | - | 520.8 | |
| −0.023 (−0.120, 0.121) | 69.6% (44.3%, 78.4%) | ||||
| hypertension | 0.873 (0.669, 1.145) | - | 489.1 | ||
| −0.017 (−0.091, 0.092) | 80.2% (49.2%, 90.6%) |