| Literature DB >> 27230660 |
Li Xu1, Dejian Lai2, Ya Fang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that there may be gender disparities in the prevalence of hypertension; however, these studies do not address the spatial information contained in the sample which may limit the analytical results. Our study extends the existing Shared Component Model (SCM) and compares its utility with a logistic regression model to evaluate the significance of spatial information for identifying risk factors for hypertension and other non-rare diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Gender variation; Hypertension; Middle-aged and elderly; Shared Component Model (SCM); Spatial analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27230660 PMCID: PMC4882773 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3121-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Characteristics of subjects reporting ever being diagnosed with hypertension according to gender
| Males, % (counts) | Females, % (counts) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years of age) | ||
| 45–59 | 20.43 (48/235) | 25.41 (78/307) |
| 60–74 | 34.43 (94/273) | 45.06 (114/253) |
| 75- | 44.00 (44/100) | 42.71 (41/96) |
| Smoke | ||
| Never | 33.52 (60/179) | 35.36 (227/642) |
| Current | 29.44 (126/428) | 42.86 (6/14) |
| Alcohol consumption | ||
| Never | 29.35 (59/201) | 35.00 (182/520) |
| Current | 40.86 (38/93) | 41.82 (23/55) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||
| <18.5 | 20.00 (6/30) | 29.03 (9/31) |
| 18.5–23.9 | 25.81 (64/248) | 24.79 (60/242) |
| 24.0–27.9 | 39.50 (47/119) | 48.73 (77/158) |
| ≥28.0 | 44.83 (13/29) | 54.55 (30/55) |
| WHtR | ||
| ≤0.5 | 18.59 (29/156) | 17.65 (15/85) |
| >0.5 | 37.87 (103/272) | 39.95 (163/408) |
BMI Body mass index, WHtR Waist-to-height ratio; The datasets supporting this findings can be found in the Additional file 1
Risk factors of hypertension by multiple logistic regressions according to gender
| Variables | Males | Females | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | |
| Age (years of age) | ||||
| 45–59 | 1.00 | _ | 1.00 | _ |
| 60–74 | 2.67* | 1.58–4.54 | 2.76* | 1.78–4.28 |
| 75- | 4.86* | 2.46–9.58 | 2.03* | 1.06–3.82 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||
| <18.5 | 0.69 | 0.24–1.92 | 1.44 | 0.56–3.73 |
| 18.5–23.9 | 1.00 | _ | 1.00 | _ |
| 24.0–27.9 | 1.68 | 0.97–2.91 | 2.96* | 1.87–4.80 |
| ≥28.0 | 2.00 | 0.85–4.71 | 3.45* | 1.82–6.53 |
| WHtR | ||||
| ≤0.5 | 1.00 | _ | 1.00 | _ |
| >0.5 | 1.85* | 1.03–3.34 | 1.84 | 0.89–3.78 |
BMI Body mass index, WHtR Waist-to-height ratio, CI Confidence Interval, *p-value < 0.05; The datasets supporting this findings can be found in the Additional file 1
Relative risk of risk factors by SCM modeling according to gender
| Parameter | Males | Females | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 95 % C.I. | Mean | 95 % C.I. | |
| RR for age | 0.965 | 0.931–1.000 | 1.012 | 0.990–1.034 |
| RR for obesity | 0.928 | 0.852–1.007 | 1.019 | 0.953–1.089 |
| RR for WHtR | 1.035 | 1.008–1.063 | 1.020 | 0.997–1.044 |
|
| 0.495 | 0.021–0.975 | 0.496 | 0.022–0.973 |
|
| 0.017 | 0.005–0.062 | 0.017 | 0.005–0.061 |
|
| 0.018 | 0.005–0.064 | 0.018 | 0.005–0.069 |
|
| 0.018 (0.005–0.064) | |||
|
| 0.016 (0.005–0.056) | |||
|
| 1.094 (0.454–2.197) | |||
| DIC (pD) | DIC = 116.188 (pD = 8.327) | |||
RR Relative Risk, DIC Deviance information criterion, WHtR Waist-to-height ratio; The datasets supporting this findings can be found in the Additional file 2
Fig. 1The administrative map of Zhejiang Province
Fig. 2a - i denotes the SPR, the RR, the posterior mean of RR adjusted for WHtR and age and the posterior mean of β of Zhejiang Province in 2012, by gender
Fig. 3Autocorrelation of RR for WHtR, 1/δ and η
Fig. 4Convergence of RR for WHtR, 1/δ and η
Sensitivity analysis with respect to different priors for the precision parameters
| Parameter | Priors 1 | Priors 2 | Priors 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95 % CI) | Mean (95 % CI) | Mean (95 % CI) | |
| RR for age | |||
| Males | 0.965 (0.931–1.000) | 0.966 (0.931–1.001) | 0.966 (0.932–1.002) |
| Females | 1.012 (0.990–1.034) | 1.012 (0.991–1.034) | 1.012 (0.991–1.034) |
| RR for obesity | |||
| Males | 0.928 (0.852–1.007) | 0.930 (0.854–1.008) | 0.931 (0.856–1.010) |
| Females | 1.019 (0.953–1.089) | 1.018 (0.955–1.085) | 1.019 (0.954–1.091) |
| RR for WHtR | |||
| Males | 1.035 (1.008–1.063) | 1.034 (1.007–1.061) | 1.034 (1.005–1.062) |
| Females | 1.020 (0.997–1.044) | 1.021 (0.999–1.044) | 1.020 (0.997–1.043) |
|
| |||
| Males | 0.495 (0.021–0.975) | 0.506 (0.109–0.897) | 0.502 (0.088–0.914) |
| Females | 0.496 (0.022–0.973) | 0.498 (0.103–0.896) | 0.502 (0.088–0.910) |
|
| 1.094 (0.454–2.197) | 1.099 (0.447–2.231) | 1.090 (0.448–2.247) |
| DIC(pD) | DIC = 116.188 (pD = 8.327) | DIC = 116.471 (pD = 8.233) | DIC = 116.196 (pD = 8.100) |
RR Relative Risk, DIC Deviance information criterion, WHtR Waist-to-height ratio
Fig. 5a and b, Kernel density of RR for WHtR for males. The sampling value and frequency of RR for WHtR are expressed in horizontal and vertical axis respectively. Two parallel MCMC chains were run for each model with samples size of 10,000