Literature DB >> 29299650

Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement?

Ted Eneqvist1,2,3, Szilárd Nemes4,5, Erik Bülow4,5, Maziar Mohaddes4,5,6, Ola Rolfson4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated if patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year after total hip replacement (THR) can predict the risk of re-operation using data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
METHODS: A total of 75,899 patients with THR due to osteoarthritis operated in 2002-2014 were included. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to investigate the relationship between one-year post-operative PROMs and risk of re-operation (all types of further hip surgery). The predictive power of the model and post-operative PROMs were evaluated by concordance index (C).
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates for not being re-operated at eight years was 95.5% (95%CI; 95.3-95.8). Cox regression analyses showed that all PROMs, except for EQ-VAS, were associated with re-operation. The full model had a concordance index of 0.68. Satisfaction (C = 0.65) and pain (C = 0.65) in isolation had the highest predictive power.
CONCLUSIONS: Worse PROMs predicted higher risk of re-operation. Therefore, we believe PROMs may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for re-operation and timely address their problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-reported outcome measurements; Prediction; Re-operation; Total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29299650     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3711-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Routine follow-up office visits after total joint replacement: do asymptomatic patients wish to comply?

Authors:  V Sethuraman; J McGuigan; W J Hozack; P F Sharkey; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke; Jeffrey N Katz; Thomas V Perneger; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Meridith E Greene; Ola Rolfson; Max Gordon; Göran Garellick; Szilard Nemes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Oxford hip scores at 6 months and 5 years are associated with total hip revision within the subsequent 2 years.

Authors:  Peter Devane; Geoffrey Horne; Daniel J Gehling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  What is the prognosis of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years and younger?

Authors:  Muyibat A Adelani; Karla Crook; Robert L Barrack; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Risk factors for revision of primary total hip replacement: results from a national case-control study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wright; Jeffrey N Katz; John A Baron; R John Wright; Henrik Malchau; Nizar Mahomed; Julian J Z Prokopetz; Elena Losina
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07

10.  Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database.

Authors:  Mika Junnila; Inari Laaksonen; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Leif Ivar Havelin; Ove Furnes; Anne Marie Fenstad; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Henrik Malchau; Keijo T Mäkelä
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  11 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Risk of Repeat Revision When Patellofemoral Replacement Is Revised to TKA? An Analysis of 482 Cases From a Large National Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Brian R Hallstrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  High-volume surgeons and high-volume journals in a multivariate orthopedic environment.

Authors:  Marius M Scarlat; Marko Pećina; Andrew Quaile
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Successful initial experience with a novel outpatient total hip arthroplasty program in a public health system in Chile.

Authors:  Orlando Paredes; Rodrigo Ñuñez; Ianiv Klaber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Ilana N Ackerman; Ian A Harris; Kara Cashman; Neville Rowden; Michelle Lorimer; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Outcome scores after hip surgery in young adults: an editorial approach.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Andreas Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Effect of continuous nursing combined with salcatonin on postoperative pains in elderly patients after hip replacement.

Authors:  Liyu Zhu; Lin Li; Binyan Yin; Xian Jiang; Huanchuan Peng; Xiaomin Hou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Implant survival and patient-reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger: a matched cohort study of 1,008 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Emma NaucléR; Johan Kärrholm; Henrik Malchau; Daniel Odin; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Kevin C Jacob; Madhav R Patel; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 9.  The Hidden Pandemic: the Cost of Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Guy L Ludbrook
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-11-01

10.  Medical device surveillance with electronic health records.

Authors:  Alison Callahan; Jason A Fries; Christopher Ré; James I Huddleston; Nicholas J Giori; Scott Delp; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.