Literature DB >> 23193090

Risk factors for revision of primary total hip replacement: results from a national case-control study.

Elizabeth A Wright1, Jeffrey N Katz, John A Baron, R John Wright, Henrik Malchau, Nizar Mahomed, Julian J Z Prokopetz, Elena Losina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the risk factors for revision of primary total hip replacement (THR) in a US population-based sample.
METHODS: Using Medicare claims, we identified beneficiaries from 29 US states who underwent primary THR between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1996, with followup through December 31, 2008. Potential cases had International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes indicating a revision THR. Each case was matched by state with 1 control THR recipient who was alive and unrevised when the case had a revision THR. We abstracted hospital records to document potential risk factors. We examined the associations between preoperative factors and revision risk using multivariate conditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: The analysis data set contained 719 of 836 case-control pairs with complete data for analysis variables. The factors associated with higher revision odds in multivariate models were age ≤75 years at primary surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20-1.92]), height in the highest tertile (OR 1.40 [95% CI 1.06-1.85]), weight in the highest tertile (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.24-2.22]), cemented femoral component (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.10-1.87]), prior contralateral primary THR (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.05-1.76]), other prior orthopedic surgery (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.13-1.84]), and living with others (versus alone; OR 1.26 [95% CI 0.99-1.61]).
CONCLUSION: This first US population-based case-control study of risk factors for revision of primary THR showed that younger, taller, and heavier patients and those receiving a cemented femoral component had a greater likelihood of undergoing a revision THR over a 12-year followup period. Effects of age and body size on revision risk should be addressed by clinicians with patients considering primary THR.
Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23193090      PMCID: PMC3510659          DOI: 10.1002/acr.21760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  27 in total

1.  Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; George Calvert; Frank Tull; Douglas McDonald; William J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saam Morshed; Kevin J Bozic; Michael D Ries; Henrik Malchau; John M Colford
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.

Authors:  G J Hooper; A G Rothwell; M Stringer; C Frampton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-04

4.  Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms. A nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36,984 patients.

Authors:  S P Johnsen; H T Sørensen; U Lucht; K Søballe; S Overgaard; A B Pedersen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-10

5.  Relationship between outcome and annual surgical experience for the charnley total hip replacement. Results from a regional hip register.

Authors:  D Fender; J H P van der Meulen; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-03

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives.

Authors:  P S Romano; L L Roos; J G Jollis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke; Richard Stern; Guido Garavaglia; Line Zurcher; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-03-15

9.  Is the long-term outcome of cemented THA jeopardized by patients being overweight?

Authors:  Daniël Haverkamp; F Harald R de Man; Pieter T de Jong; Renée A van Stralen; René K Marti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Twelve-year risk of revision after primary total hip replacement in the U.S. Medicare population.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Elizabeth A Wright; John Wright; Henrik Malchau; Nizar N Mahomed; Margaret Stedman; John A Baron; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  10 in total

1.  Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement?

Authors:  Ted Eneqvist; Szilárd Nemes; Erik Bülow; Maziar Mohaddes; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Reconstruction of the Acetabulum in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; Michael Christodoulou; Gregory Sasalos; George C Babis
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

3.  Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Atul F Kamath; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Steve Kurtz; Vanessa Chan; Thomas P Vail; Harry Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does peritrochanteric fat thickness increase the risk of early reoperation for infection or wound complications following total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Joshua A Bell; Andrew Jeong; Daniel D Bohl; Brett Levine; Craig Della Valle; Denis Nam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

5.  Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Indian Experience.

Authors:  Gaurav Mittal; Vikas Kulshrestha; Santhosh Kumar; Barun Datta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Risk factors for early revision after total hip and knee arthroplasty: National observational study from a surgeon and population perspective.

Authors:  Alex Bottle; Sunny Parikh; Paul Aylin; Mark Loeffler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Pai; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Soft-tissue thickness radiographic measurement: a marker to evaluate acute periprosthetic joint infection risk in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Laura Rey Fernández; Francesc Angles Crespo; Silvia María Miguela Álvarez; Martí Carles Bernaus-Johnson; Agustí Bartra Ylla; Lluís Font-Vizcarra
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-06-04

9.  Association between Exposure to Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs and Survivorship of Total Hip Replacement in Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 246,940 Patients.

Authors:  Dan Beziz; Sandrine Colas; Cédric Collin; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysis of early stage osteonecrosis of the human femoral head and the mechanism of femoral head collapse.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Haoye Meng; Yu Wang; Bin Zhao; Chenyang Zhao; Weijia Sun; Yun Zhu; Bingxing Han; Xueling Yuan; Ruoxi Liu; Xin Wang; Aiyuan Wang; Quanyi Guo; Jiang Peng; Shibi Lu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 6.580

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.