Literature DB >> 29299474

Improvement in hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength following cruciate-retaining single radius total knee arthroplasty.

Jennifer Kurowicki1, Anton Khlopas2, Assem A Sultan2, Nipun Sodhi2, Linsen T Samuel2, Morad Chughtai2, Martin Roche3, Peter M Bonutti4, Michael A Mont2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to reach full functional capacity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reliant on the strength of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles. Weakness of these muscles can persist anywhere from 1 to 3 years post-operatively. There remains considerable controversy as to what factors influence restoration of muscle strength after TKA. Implant designs have been implicated in the ability of patients to recover. Currently there is a paucity of literature available describing the influence of patient characteristics, surgical factors, and clinical outcomes on quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength following TKA with a cruciate-retaining, single radius (SR) implant. For this reason, we sought to investigate TKA patients for: (I) quadriceps muscle strength; (II) hamstring muscle strength; (III) flexion/extension (F/E) ratio; (IV) clinical outcome scores; (V) influence of patient characteristics on muscle strength at one-year post-operatively.
METHODS: A review of TKA patients who were assessed for hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength was conducted. A total of 39 patients (26 men and 13 women), who had a mean age of 68 years (range, 51 to 88 years) were included. Isokinetic dynamometer testing at 180 degree/second for 3 sets of 10 repetitions in extension and flexion were performed by an independent physical therapist to assess dynamic concentric torque of the hamstrings and quadriceps muscle. F/E ratios were calculated. TKA was performed via subvastus (n=20) or midvastus (n=19) approach. Subgroup analysis for surgical approach, concomitant spinal pathology (n=11), gender, age and body mass index (BMI) were performed. Knee Society Scores (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed at each visit. Comparisons of groups were performed using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative relative extension torque was 23 Nm/kg (range, 9 to 43 Nm/kg), representing a mean increase of 38% (range, -16% to 100%; P=0.0267) from pre-operative status. A mean increase of 27% (range, -15% to 100%; P=0.0433) in flexion strength and mean relative flexion torque of 19 Nm/kg (range, 8-37 Nm/kg) was observed. Pre-operative mean F/E ratio was 0.8 and 0.9 post-operatively (P=0.3028). Men demonstrated significantly greater improvements in flexion compared to women (22% vs. 12%; P<0.0001), but gender had no influence on improvement in extension (27% vs. 15%; P=0.0537). Postoperative F/E was similar for males (0.8) and females (0.9; P=0.4454). Surgical approach did not influence quadriceps muscle strength (P=0.1786) or hamstrings muscle strength (P=0.9592). History of spine pathology had no impact on muscles strength (hamstring, P=0.5684; quadriceps, P=0.7221). For the overall group, a mean KSS pain score was 96 points (range, 84 to 100 points), KSS function was 96 points (range, 80 to 100 points), and mean ROM of 0 to 114 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength can be expected at 1 year post-operatively regardless of gender, surgical approach or concomitant spinal pathology. Further comparative investigation on the impact of implant design on hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength is warranted. However, the use of a SR, CR TKA system demonstrated significant improvements post-operatively in quadriceps and hamstring strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total knee arthroplasty (TKA); cruciate retaining; hamstring strength; quadriceps strength; single radius (SR)

Year:  2017        PMID: 29299474      PMCID: PMC5750266          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  24 in total

1.  Early range of motion of the scorpio non-restrictive geometry cruciate-retaining total knee system.

Authors:  Clifford W Colwell; Jonathan D Gelber; Pamela A Pulido; Kevin M Casey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Sagittal curvature of total knee replacements predicts in vivo kinematics.

Authors:  Oliver Kessler; Lutz Dürselen; Scott Banks; Henrich Mannel; Frédéric Marin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Isokinetic strength testing of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty recovery.

Authors:  William C Schroer; Paul J Diesfeld; Mary E Reedy; Angela R LeMarr
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Peak knee flexion angles during stair descent in TKA patients.

Authors:  Joakim Bjerke; Fredrik Öhberg; Kjell G Nilsson; Olav A Foss; Ann K Stensdotter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  A comparison of stability and clinical outcomes in single-radius versus multi-radius femoral design for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ah-Reum Jo; Eun-Kyoo Song; Keun-Bae Lee; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Sung-Kyu Kim; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii.

Authors:  He Wang; Kathy J Simpson; Michael S Ferrara; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Tracy Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects.

Authors:  M Walsh; L J Woodhouse; S G Thomas; E Finch
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-03

8.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Differences in gait characteristics between total hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty patients: a six-month postoperative comparison.

Authors:  Nicola C Casartelli; Julia F Item-Glatthorn; Mario Bizzini; Michael Leunig; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.